Aislinn Muller, The Excommunication of Elizabeth I: Faith, Politics, and Resistance in Post-Reformation England, 1570-1603, Leiden: Brill, 2020, pp. x+242, €125.00, ISBN: 978-90-04-42600-9

IF 0.2 2区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY British Catholic History Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI:10.1017/bch.2021.9
E. Gregory
{"title":"Aislinn Muller, The Excommunication of Elizabeth I: Faith, Politics, and Resistance in Post-Reformation England, 1570-1603, Leiden: Brill, 2020, pp. x+242, €125.00, ISBN: 978-90-04-42600-9","authors":"E. Gregory","doi":"10.1017/bch.2021.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ambiguities of confessional allegiances during the Tudor period. What do we mean by Catholic? This was as vexed a question during Mary’s reign as it was before and after her. It is worth noting that critiques of Mary were not only the product of Protestant zeal, but also of a certain Jesuit sensibility later in the sixteenth century, which emphasized her failures of religious reform. Her shortcomings were linked to a supposedly corrupt court that could and did help dupe and misleadMary and Philip. Samson ultimately argues that the co-rulership of Philip and Mary was, in fact ‘a great success, incorporating England into the heart of a global empire’ (p. 223). To be sure, the cultural and political effects of the marriage are not primarily ‘negative’ but it would be remarkable if England departed from the realities of the rest of the empire, held together as it was in the shadow of instability and discontent, even within the Iberian Peninsula. If one were forgiven to dabble in counterfactuals, as much of the recent literature on Mary does, it is easy to imagine this early honeymoon period as described here descending into chaos amid contention between the regime and the papacy (the architect of religious reform, Reginald Pole, had been excommunicated by the Pope), potential ongoing punishments of Protestants, and deepening involvement of England in the various crises attending the Spanish Habsburg empire. It seems to me that a glittering court does not in any way reflect stability. Ultimately, though, Samson has provided a foundational work in what he rightly identifies as a field awaiting more exploration. There is little doubt that his book is a sort of death knell for old-fashioned takes on Mary and Philip: it shows by example that there are all sorts of sources that have been untapped. Having helped establish this, I hope that scholarship will increasingly deal with the Marian regime outside the shadow of chauvinist and confessional scholarship that seems more dull and dilapidated with every passing year.","PeriodicalId":41292,"journal":{"name":"British Catholic History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/bch.2021.9","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Catholic History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bch.2021.9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ambiguities of confessional allegiances during the Tudor period. What do we mean by Catholic? This was as vexed a question during Mary’s reign as it was before and after her. It is worth noting that critiques of Mary were not only the product of Protestant zeal, but also of a certain Jesuit sensibility later in the sixteenth century, which emphasized her failures of religious reform. Her shortcomings were linked to a supposedly corrupt court that could and did help dupe and misleadMary and Philip. Samson ultimately argues that the co-rulership of Philip and Mary was, in fact ‘a great success, incorporating England into the heart of a global empire’ (p. 223). To be sure, the cultural and political effects of the marriage are not primarily ‘negative’ but it would be remarkable if England departed from the realities of the rest of the empire, held together as it was in the shadow of instability and discontent, even within the Iberian Peninsula. If one were forgiven to dabble in counterfactuals, as much of the recent literature on Mary does, it is easy to imagine this early honeymoon period as described here descending into chaos amid contention between the regime and the papacy (the architect of religious reform, Reginald Pole, had been excommunicated by the Pope), potential ongoing punishments of Protestants, and deepening involvement of England in the various crises attending the Spanish Habsburg empire. It seems to me that a glittering court does not in any way reflect stability. Ultimately, though, Samson has provided a foundational work in what he rightly identifies as a field awaiting more exploration. There is little doubt that his book is a sort of death knell for old-fashioned takes on Mary and Philip: it shows by example that there are all sorts of sources that have been untapped. Having helped establish this, I hope that scholarship will increasingly deal with the Marian regime outside the shadow of chauvinist and confessional scholarship that seems more dull and dilapidated with every passing year.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aislinn Muller,伊丽莎白一世的逐出教会:信仰,政治和抵抗后改革英格兰,1570-1603,莱顿:Brill, 2020, pp. x+242,€125.00,ISBN: 978-90-04-42600-9
都铎王朝时期忏悔效忠的模糊性天主教是什么意思?在玛丽在位期间,这个问题一直困扰着她,就像她在位前后一样。值得注意的是,对玛丽的批评不仅是新教热情的产物,也是后来16世纪耶稣会的某种敏感性的产物,强调了她在宗教改革方面的失败。她的缺点与一个据称腐败的法庭有关,这个法庭可能而且确实帮助欺骗和误导了玛丽和菲利普。参孙最终认为,菲利普和玛丽的共同统治实际上是“一个巨大的成功,将英格兰纳入全球帝国的中心”(第223页)。可以肯定的是,这场婚姻的文化和政治影响并非主要是“负面的”,但如果英格兰脱离了帝国其他地区的现实,即使在伊比利亚半岛内部,也会因为不稳定和不满的阴影而团结在一起,这将是值得注意的。如果有人可以像最近许多关于玛丽的文献一样,在反事实方面有所涉足,那么很容易想象这里描述的早期蜜月期在政权和教皇之间的争论中陷入混乱(宗教改革的设计师雷金纳德·波尔被教皇逐出教会),可能持续的对新教徒的惩罚,以及英国在西班牙哈布斯堡帝国的各种危机中不断加深的卷入。在我看来,一个闪闪发光的法庭在任何方面都不代表稳定。尽管如此,Samson最终还是在一个有待进一步探索的领域提供了一份基础工作。毫无疑问,他的书是对玛丽和菲利普的老式看法的一种丧钟:它通过实例表明,有各种各样的资源尚未开发。在帮助建立了这一点之后,我希望学术界将越来越多地在沙文主义和忏悔学术的阴影之外处理玛丽安政权,这些学术似乎一年比一年沉闷和破旧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: British Catholic History (formerly titled Recusant History) acts as a forum for innovative, vibrant, transnational, inter-disciplinary scholarship resulting from research on the history of British and Irish Catholicism at home and throughout the world. BCH publishes peer-reviewed original research articles, review articles and shorter reviews of works on all aspects of British and Irish Catholic history from the 15th Century up to the present day. Central to our publishing policy is an emphasis on the multi-faceted, national and international dimensions of British Catholic history, which provide both readers and authors with a uniquely interesting lens through which to examine British and Atlantic history. The journal welcomes contributions on all approaches to the Catholic experience.
期刊最新文献
Resurrection and reconstruction of the Meditationes Vitae Christi in early modern England Mary Ann Lyons and Brian Mac Cuarta eds, The Jesuit Mission in Early Modern Ireland, 1560-1760, Dublin: Four Courts Press, 2022, pp. 272, £50.00, ISBN: 978-1801510257 BCH volume 36 issue 4 Cover and Back matter Susan Powell, ed., The Household Accounts of Lady Margaret Beaufort (1443–1509): From the Archives of St John’s College, Cambridge, Oxford: Oxford University Press for the British Academy, 2022, pp. 735, £145.00, ISBN: 9780197267042 Memory, myth and memorialization: Catholic martyrs and martyrologies in early modern England
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1