Dosimetric comparison of collapsed cone convolution/superposition and anisotropic analytic algorithms in the presence of eXaSkin bolus in radiotherapy

Q3 Health Professions Iranian Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2020-10-24 DOI:10.22038/IJMP.2020.49078.1789
Leila Mohammadian, Mohsen Bakhshandeh, E. Saeedzadeh, A. J. Arfaee, R. Abedi-Firouzjah
{"title":"Dosimetric comparison of collapsed cone convolution/superposition and anisotropic analytic algorithms in the presence of eXaSkin bolus in radiotherapy","authors":"Leila Mohammadian, Mohsen Bakhshandeh, E. Saeedzadeh, A. J. Arfaee, R. Abedi-Firouzjah","doi":"10.22038/IJMP.2020.49078.1789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Bolus type materials are needed in case of superficial lesions radiotherapy. This work determined the dosimetric accuracy of two commercial treatment planning systems (TPS) for the calculation of photon dose distribution in the presence of eXaSkin bolus.Material and methods: Dose calculations were performed on collapsed cone convolution/superposition (CCC) and anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) using computed tomography (CT) images of heterogeneous CIRS phantom. EBT3 film was used for obtaining percentage depth dose (PDD) curves and gamma index was utilized for comparing the accuracy of the two algorithms. The passing rate of global gamma index with the passing criterion of 3mm/3% as the standard criterion was considered 95% in this study. Results: Surface dose in PDD curves increased in the presence of 0.5 cm thick eXaSkin bolus. The passing rates of gamma index with standard passing criterion between AAA algorithm and EBT3 film measurements without and with bolus were 95% and 95.5%, respectively, while they were equal to 96% and 97.5% for CCC algorithm. Conclusion: There was a good agreement in dose calculation between AAA and CCC algorithms. Furthermore, eXaSkin bolus increased the surface dose by a factor of 25%.","PeriodicalId":14613,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJMP.2020.49078.1789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bolus type materials are needed in case of superficial lesions radiotherapy. This work determined the dosimetric accuracy of two commercial treatment planning systems (TPS) for the calculation of photon dose distribution in the presence of eXaSkin bolus.Material and methods: Dose calculations were performed on collapsed cone convolution/superposition (CCC) and anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) using computed tomography (CT) images of heterogeneous CIRS phantom. EBT3 film was used for obtaining percentage depth dose (PDD) curves and gamma index was utilized for comparing the accuracy of the two algorithms. The passing rate of global gamma index with the passing criterion of 3mm/3% as the standard criterion was considered 95% in this study. Results: Surface dose in PDD curves increased in the presence of 0.5 cm thick eXaSkin bolus. The passing rates of gamma index with standard passing criterion between AAA algorithm and EBT3 film measurements without and with bolus were 95% and 95.5%, respectively, while they were equal to 96% and 97.5% for CCC algorithm. Conclusion: There was a good agreement in dose calculation between AAA and CCC algorithms. Furthermore, eXaSkin bolus increased the surface dose by a factor of 25%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放疗中eXaSkin丸存在时塌陷锥卷积/叠加和各向异性分析算法的剂量学比较
简介:浅表病变放射治疗需要丸型材料。本工作确定了两种商用处理计划系统(TPS)在eXaSkin丸存在时计算光子剂量分布的剂量学准确性。材料和方法:利用异质CIRS幻影的CT图像,采用塌锥卷积/叠加(CCC)和各向异性分析算法(AAA)进行剂量计算。采用EBT3薄膜获得百分比深度剂量(PDD)曲线,用伽马指数比较两种算法的准确性。本研究认为以3mm/3%为标准标准的全局伽玛指数通过率为95%。结果:0.5 cm厚的eXaSkin丸使PDD曲线表面剂量增加。AAA算法与未加丸和加丸的EBT3测膜的gamma指数具有标准合格率分别为95%和95.5%,而CCC算法与未加丸的EBT3测膜的gamma指数分别为96%和97.5%。结论:AAA算法与CCC算法在剂量计算上有较好的一致性。此外,eXaSkin丸将表面剂量增加了25%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Iranian Journal of Medical Physics (IJMP) is the official scientific bimonthly publication of the Iranian Association of Medical Physicists. IJMP is an international and multidisciplinary journal, peer review, free of charge publication and open access. This journal devoted to publish Original Papers, Review Articles, Short Communications, Technical Notes, Editorial and Letters to the Editor in the field of “Medical Physics” involving both basic and clinical research. Submissions of manuscript from all countries are welcome and will be reviewed by at least two expert reviewers.
期刊最新文献
Secondary cancer risk after radiotherapy of seminoma stage one The effect of cobalt oxide nanoparticles on improving the quality of CT and PET scan medical imaging Scatter radiation absorbed dose distribution in coronary angiography: A measurement based study Evaluation of Low-Dose 3D skull CT images in craniosynostosis Left-sided Breast Cancer Radiotherapy and Risk of Heart Diseases: with Considering Baseline Risk of Heart Diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1