It pays to be forthcoming: timing of data breach announcement, trust violation, and trust restoration

IF 5.9 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Internet Research Pub Date : 2023-07-07 DOI:10.1108/intr-12-2021-0939
Steven Muzatko, Gaurav Bansal
{"title":"It pays to be forthcoming: timing of data breach announcement, trust violation, and trust restoration","authors":"Steven Muzatko, Gaurav Bansal","doi":"10.1108/intr-12-2021-0939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis research examines the relationship between the timeliness in announcing the discovery of a data breach and consumer trust in an e-commerce company, as well as later trust-rebuilding efforts taken by the company to compensate users impacted by the breach.Design/methodology/approachA survey experiment was used to examine the effect of both trust-reducing events (announced data breaches) and trust-enhancing events (provision of identity theft protection and credit monitoring) on consumer trust. The timeliness of the breach announcement by an e-commerce company was manipulated between two randomly assigned groups of subjects; one group viewed an announcement of the breach immediately upon its discovery, and the other viewed an announcement made two months after the breach was discovered. Consumer trust was measured before the breach, after the breach was announced, and finally, after the announcement of data protection.FindingsThe results suggest that companies that delay a data breach announcement are likely to suffer a larger drop in consumer trust than those that immediately disclose the data breach. The results also suggest that trust can be repaired by providing data protection. However, even after providing identity theft protection and credit monitoring, companies that fail to promptly disclose a breach have lower repaired trust than companies that promptly disclose.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature on e-commerce trust by examining how a company's forthrightness in reporting a data breach impacts user trust at the time of the disclosure of the data breach and after subsequent efforts to repair trust.","PeriodicalId":54925,"journal":{"name":"Internet Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-12-2021-0939","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis research examines the relationship between the timeliness in announcing the discovery of a data breach and consumer trust in an e-commerce company, as well as later trust-rebuilding efforts taken by the company to compensate users impacted by the breach.Design/methodology/approachA survey experiment was used to examine the effect of both trust-reducing events (announced data breaches) and trust-enhancing events (provision of identity theft protection and credit monitoring) on consumer trust. The timeliness of the breach announcement by an e-commerce company was manipulated between two randomly assigned groups of subjects; one group viewed an announcement of the breach immediately upon its discovery, and the other viewed an announcement made two months after the breach was discovered. Consumer trust was measured before the breach, after the breach was announced, and finally, after the announcement of data protection.FindingsThe results suggest that companies that delay a data breach announcement are likely to suffer a larger drop in consumer trust than those that immediately disclose the data breach. The results also suggest that trust can be repaired by providing data protection. However, even after providing identity theft protection and credit monitoring, companies that fail to promptly disclose a breach have lower repaired trust than companies that promptly disclose.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature on e-commerce trust by examining how a company's forthrightness in reporting a data breach impacts user trust at the time of the disclosure of the data breach and after subsequent efforts to repair trust.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
及时公布数据泄露、违反信任和恢复信任是值得的
目的本研究考察了电子商务公司发现数据泄露的及时性与消费者信任之间的关系,以及该公司后来为补偿受数据泄露影响的用户而采取的信任重建措施。设计/方法/方法使用调查实验来检验减少信任事件(公布的数据泄露)和增强信任事件(提供身份盗窃保护和信用监控)对消费者信任的影响。一家电子商务公司违规公告的及时性在两组随机分配的受试者之间进行了操纵;一组人在发现违规行为后立即查看公告,另一组人查看违规行为发现两个月后发布的公告。消费者信任是在违约发生前、宣布违约后以及宣布数据保护后进行衡量的。调查结果表明,与那些立即披露数据泄露的公司相比,推迟公布数据泄露消息的公司可能会遭受更大的消费者信任度下降。研究结果还表明,可以通过提供数据保护来修复信任。然而,即使在提供了身份盗窃保护和信用监控之后,未能及时披露违规行为的公司的修复信任度也低于及时披露的公司。独创性/价值这项研究通过研究一家公司在报告数据泄露时的直率如何在数据泄露披露时以及随后努力修复信任后影响用户信任,为电子商务信任文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internet Research
Internet Research 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.20%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This wide-ranging interdisciplinary journal looks at the social, ethical, economic and political implications of the internet. Recent issues have focused on online and mobile gaming, the sharing economy, and the dark side of social media.
期刊最新文献
Does social presence drive customer brand engagement and purchase intention in the fashion retail metaverse? The moderating role of self-efficacy Can digital transformation alleviate corporate fraud? Evidence from China Gameful systems for corporate sustainability: systematic review, conceptual framework and research agenda on gamification and sustainable employee behavior in companies Why do people customize avatars in the metaverse? Curiosity and SOR model perspective “I am sorry for judging you”: conceptualizing sentiment reversal among followers in case of falsely alleged social media influencer transgression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1