Selective Inference for Effect Modification: An Empirical Investigation

Qingyuan Zhao, Snigdha Panigrahi
{"title":"Selective Inference for Effect Modification: An Empirical Investigation","authors":"Qingyuan Zhao, Snigdha Panigrahi","doi":"10.1353/obs.2019.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:We demonstrate a selective inferential approach for discovering and making confident conclusions about treatment effect heterogeneity. Our method consists of two stages. First, we use Robinson’s transformation to eliminate confounding in the observational study. Next we select a simple model for effect modification using lasso-regularized regression and then use recently developed tools in selective inference to make valid statistical inference for the discovered effect modifiers. We analyze the Mindset Study data-set provided by the workshop organizers and compare our approach with other benchmark methods.","PeriodicalId":74335,"journal":{"name":"Observational studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/obs.2019.0007","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Observational studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2019.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract:We demonstrate a selective inferential approach for discovering and making confident conclusions about treatment effect heterogeneity. Our method consists of two stages. First, we use Robinson’s transformation to eliminate confounding in the observational study. Next we select a simple model for effect modification using lasso-regularized regression and then use recently developed tools in selective inference to make valid statistical inference for the discovered effect modifiers. We analyze the Mindset Study data-set provided by the workshop organizers and compare our approach with other benchmark methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
效果修正的选择性推理:一项实证研究
摘要:我们展示了一种选择性推理方法来发现和得出关于治疗效果异质性的可靠结论。我们的方法包括两个阶段。首先,我们使用罗宾逊变换来消除观察研究中的混淆。接下来,我们使用套索正则化回归选择一个简单的效果修正模型,然后使用最近开发的选择性推理工具对发现的效果修正器进行有效的统计推断。我们分析了研讨会组织者提供的心态研究数据集,并将我们的方法与其他基准方法进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does matching introduce confounding or selection bias into the matched case-control design? Size-biased sensitivity analysis for matched pairs design to assess the impact of healthcare-associated infections A Software Tutorial for Matching in Clustered Observational Studies Using a difference-in-difference control trial to test an intervention aimed at increasing the take-up of a welfare payment in New Zealand Estimating Treatment Effect with Propensity Score Weighted Regression and Double Machine Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1