{"title":"Bérénice on Trial: Judging Corneille Against Racine","authors":"H. Bilis","doi":"10.1080/20563035.2020.1856571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 21 November 1670, Parisian spectators could watch Racine's Bérénice at the Hôtel de Bourgogne and, a week later, attend the premiere of Corneille's Tite et Bérénice at the Palais Royal, as the playwrights and their troupes vied for box office success. Despite Racine's victory, scholarship on the playwrights has minimized the importance of this duel as just one among many guerres comiques. This essay argues that the comedy, Tite et Titus ou Critique sur les Bérénices, published anonymously in 1673, enables a better understanding of how the duelling plays were a defining experience for both playwrights. The comedy stages Racine's Titus and Corneille's Tite, who come before the god Apollon in judgment, accusing one another of impersonation. Understanding the allegory of the Parnasse trial renders visible the stakes of the Bérénice duel and illustrates the changing reception of the tragic genre in the last quarter of seventeenth-century France.","PeriodicalId":40652,"journal":{"name":"Early Modern French Studies","volume":"42 1","pages":"160 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20563035.2020.1856571","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Modern French Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20563035.2020.1856571","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
On 21 November 1670, Parisian spectators could watch Racine's Bérénice at the Hôtel de Bourgogne and, a week later, attend the premiere of Corneille's Tite et Bérénice at the Palais Royal, as the playwrights and their troupes vied for box office success. Despite Racine's victory, scholarship on the playwrights has minimized the importance of this duel as just one among many guerres comiques. This essay argues that the comedy, Tite et Titus ou Critique sur les Bérénices, published anonymously in 1673, enables a better understanding of how the duelling plays were a defining experience for both playwrights. The comedy stages Racine's Titus and Corneille's Tite, who come before the god Apollon in judgment, accusing one another of impersonation. Understanding the allegory of the Parnasse trial renders visible the stakes of the Bérénice duel and illustrates the changing reception of the tragic genre in the last quarter of seventeenth-century France.
期刊介绍:
Early Modern French Studies (formerly Seventeenth-Century French Studies) publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original articles in English and French on a broad range of literary, cultural, methodological, and theoretical topics relating to the study of early modern France. The journal has expanded its historical scope and now covers work on the sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries. Within this period of French literary and cultural history, the journal particularly welcomes work that relates to the term ''early modern'', as well as work that interrogates it. It continues to publish special issues devoted to particular topics (such as the highly successful 2014 special issue on the cultural history of fans) as well as individual submissions.