Efficient metaheuristic-retrofitted techniques for concrete slump simulation

IF 2.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Smart Structures and Systems Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI:10.12989/SSS.2021.27.5.745
Yinghao Zhao, C. Bai, Chengyong Xu, L. K. Foong
{"title":"Efficient metaheuristic-retrofitted techniques for concrete slump simulation","authors":"Yinghao Zhao, C. Bai, Chengyong Xu, L. K. Foong","doi":"10.12989/SSS.2021.27.5.745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the benefits of the early prediction of concrete slump, introducing an efficient model for this purpose is of great importance. Considering this motivation, four strong metaheuristic algorithms, namely electromagnetic field optimization (EFO), water cycle algorithm (WCA), teaching-learning-based optimization (TLBO), and multi-tracker optimization algorithm (MTOA) are used to supervise a neural predictive system in analyzing the slump pattern. This supervision protects the network against computational issues like pre-mature convergence. The overall results (e.g., Pearson correlation indicator larger than 0.839 and 0.807 for the training and testing data, respectively) revealed the competency of the proposed models. However, investigating the rankings of the models pointed out the superiority of the WCA (MAEtrain = 3.3080 vs. 3.7821, 3.5782, and 3.6851; and MAEtest = 3.8443 vs. 4.0326, 4.1417, and 4.0871 obtained for the EFO, TLBO, and MTOA, respectively). Moreover, the high efficiency of the EFO in terms of model complexity and convergence rate, as well as the adequate accuracy of prediction, demonstrated the suitability of the corresponding ensemble. Therefore, the neural systems trained by these two algorithms (i.e., the WCA and EFO) are efficient slump evaluative models and can give an optimal design of the concrete mixture for any desirable slump.","PeriodicalId":51155,"journal":{"name":"Smart Structures and Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart Structures and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12989/SSS.2021.27.5.745","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

Due to the benefits of the early prediction of concrete slump, introducing an efficient model for this purpose is of great importance. Considering this motivation, four strong metaheuristic algorithms, namely electromagnetic field optimization (EFO), water cycle algorithm (WCA), teaching-learning-based optimization (TLBO), and multi-tracker optimization algorithm (MTOA) are used to supervise a neural predictive system in analyzing the slump pattern. This supervision protects the network against computational issues like pre-mature convergence. The overall results (e.g., Pearson correlation indicator larger than 0.839 and 0.807 for the training and testing data, respectively) revealed the competency of the proposed models. However, investigating the rankings of the models pointed out the superiority of the WCA (MAEtrain = 3.3080 vs. 3.7821, 3.5782, and 3.6851; and MAEtest = 3.8443 vs. 4.0326, 4.1417, and 4.0871 obtained for the EFO, TLBO, and MTOA, respectively). Moreover, the high efficiency of the EFO in terms of model complexity and convergence rate, as well as the adequate accuracy of prediction, demonstrated the suitability of the corresponding ensemble. Therefore, the neural systems trained by these two algorithms (i.e., the WCA and EFO) are efficient slump evaluative models and can give an optimal design of the concrete mixture for any desirable slump.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混凝土坍落度模拟的有效元启发式改进技术
考虑到混凝土坍落度的早期预测的好处,引入一种有效的模型对此具有重要意义。考虑到这一动机,利用电磁场优化(EFO)、水循环算法(WCA)、基于教学的优化(TLBO)和多跟踪器优化算法(MTOA)等四种强元启发式算法对滑塌模式分析的神经预测系统进行监督。这种监督保护网络免受早熟收敛等计算问题的影响。总体结果(例如,训练数据和测试数据的Pearson相关指标分别大于0.839和0.807)显示了所提出模型的胜任力。然而,通过对模型排名的调查,发现WCA的优势(MAEtrain = 3.3080 vs. 3.7821、3.5782和3.6851);MAEtest = 3.8443,而EFO、TLBO和MTOA分别为4.0326、4.1417和4.0871)。此外,EFO在模型复杂度和收敛速度方面的高效率,以及足够的预测精度,证明了相应集合的适用性。因此,由这两种算法训练的神经系统(即WCA和EFO)是有效的坍落度评价模型,可以给出任何理想坍落度的混凝土混合料的最优设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Smart Structures and Systems
Smart Structures and Systems 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: An International Journal of Mechatronics, Sensors, Monitoring, Control, Diagnosis, and Management airns at providing a major publication channel for researchers in the general area of smart structures and systems. Typical subjects considered by the journal include: Sensors/Actuators(Materials/devices/ informatics/networking) Structural Health Monitoring and Control Diagnosis/Prognosis Life Cycle Engineering(planning/design/ maintenance/renewal) and related areas.
期刊最新文献
Analysis, optimization and control of an adaptive tuned vibration absorber featuring magnetoactive materials Numerical investigation on cyclic behaviour of superelastic shape memory alloy (SMA) dampers Hybrid fragility curve derivation of buildings based on post-earthquake reconnaissance data A corrosion threshold-controllable sensing system of Fe-C coated long period fiber gratings for life-cycle mass loss measurement of steel bars with strain and temperature compensation Steel dual-ring dampers: Micro-finite element modelling and validation of cyclic behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1