Context matters: Sociocultural considerations in the design and implementation of community-based positive psychology interventions in sub-Saharan Africa

IF 1 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Culture & Psychology Pub Date : 2022-08-12 DOI:10.1177/1354067X221118916
R. Appiah
{"title":"Context matters: Sociocultural considerations in the design and implementation of community-based positive psychology interventions in sub-Saharan Africa","authors":"R. Appiah","doi":"10.1177/1354067X221118916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholars conducting cross-cultural research in mental health often import intervention programs found to be efficacious in one social context (e.g., Western) and directly implement them in other contexts (e.g., African and Asian) without recourse to the sociocultural disparities between the target populations and the theoretical foundations of the constructs and principles underpinning the intervention programs. Such efforts mistakenly assume that positive psychology interventions (PPIs), most of which were developed from Western perspectives and assumed individualistic cultural orientation and value systems, operate equally across all contexts. Drawing on the extant literature and on insights from designing, implementing, and evaluating group-based (mental) health behavior change intervention programs across several communities in Ghana, we discuss some sociocultural, theoretical, and methodological issues that can significantly constrain the design, uptake, and effectiveness of PPIs in the rural, low literate, socioeconomically disadvantaged, highly collectivistic context of Ghana, and sub-Saharan Africa more generally. In all illustrations, we offer suggestions to guide the design and implementation processes to ensure culturally appropriate, highly acceptable, and potentially effective intervention programs. We argue that PPIs can be potentially fructuous in the sub-region when adapted to, or embedded in, the cultural values of the target population and tailored to the needs, capacities, and circumstances of participants.","PeriodicalId":47241,"journal":{"name":"Culture & Psychology","volume":"28 1","pages":"613 - 639"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture & Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X221118916","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Scholars conducting cross-cultural research in mental health often import intervention programs found to be efficacious in one social context (e.g., Western) and directly implement them in other contexts (e.g., African and Asian) without recourse to the sociocultural disparities between the target populations and the theoretical foundations of the constructs and principles underpinning the intervention programs. Such efforts mistakenly assume that positive psychology interventions (PPIs), most of which were developed from Western perspectives and assumed individualistic cultural orientation and value systems, operate equally across all contexts. Drawing on the extant literature and on insights from designing, implementing, and evaluating group-based (mental) health behavior change intervention programs across several communities in Ghana, we discuss some sociocultural, theoretical, and methodological issues that can significantly constrain the design, uptake, and effectiveness of PPIs in the rural, low literate, socioeconomically disadvantaged, highly collectivistic context of Ghana, and sub-Saharan Africa more generally. In all illustrations, we offer suggestions to guide the design and implementation processes to ensure culturally appropriate, highly acceptable, and potentially effective intervention programs. We argue that PPIs can be potentially fructuous in the sub-region when adapted to, or embedded in, the cultural values of the target population and tailored to the needs, capacities, and circumstances of participants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景问题:在撒哈拉以南非洲设计和实施基于社区的积极心理学干预的社会文化考虑
在心理健康领域进行跨文化研究的学者通常会引入在一个社会背景下(如西方)有效的干预计划,并在其他背景下(例如非洲和亚洲)直接实施,而不求助于目标人群之间的社会文化差异以及支撑心理健康的结构和原则的理论基础干预计划。这些努力错误地认为,积极的心理干预措施(PPI)在所有情况下都是平等的,其中大多数是从西方角度发展起来的,并假设了个人主义的文化取向和价值体系。根据现有文献以及加纳几个社区基于群体(心理)健康行为改变干预计划的设计、实施和评估的见解,我们讨论了一些社会文化、理论和方法论问题,这些问题可能会严重限制农村、低文化、,加纳和撒哈拉以南非洲的社会经济弱势、高度集体主义背景。在所有插图中,我们提供了指导设计和实施过程的建议,以确保文化上合适、高度可接受且潜在有效的干预计划。我们认为,当PPI适应或嵌入目标人群的文化价值观,并根据参与者的需求、能力和环境进行调整时,PPI可能会在次区域产生潜在的成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Culture & Psychology
Culture & Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
18.80%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Culture & Psychology addresses the centrality of culture necessary for a basic understanding of the psychology of human beings: their identity, social conduct, intra- and intersubjective experiences, emotions and semiotic creativity. By drawing on diverse theoretical backgrounds, the editorial aim is to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for scholarly investigations and discussions that will advance our basic knowledge of the self in its historical and cultural contexts. The orientation of the journal is towards formulating new conceptualizations of culture in psychology, together with theoretically relevant empirical investigations.
期刊最新文献
Moving up the stream beyond resistance to counter move The homeless mind in a mobile world: An autoethnographic approach on cognitive immobility in international migration Cultural and idiographic approach to the microgenesis of visual metaphors Exploring experiences of proculturation in international students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Identity and parent-child relationship representations of Nezha: From cultural narrative to case conceptualization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1