Improving cervical spinal cord lesion detection in multiple sclerosis using filtered fused proton density-T2 weighted images

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Acta radiologica open Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1177/20584601221105228
Khalid O Alharbi, A. Abujamea, O. Alomair, Hussein M. Alsakkaf, A. Alharbi, Sami A. Alghamdi, Abdullah G Alharbi
{"title":"Improving cervical spinal cord lesion detection in multiple sclerosis using filtered fused proton density-T2 weighted images","authors":"Khalid O Alharbi, A. Abujamea, O. Alomair, Hussein M. Alsakkaf, A. Alharbi, Sami A. Alghamdi, Abdullah G Alharbi","doi":"10.1177/20584601221105228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is considered a vital in depicting multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions. Current studies demonstrate that proton density (PD) weighted images (WI) are superior to T2 WI in detecting MS lesions (plaques) in the spinal cord. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic value of filtered fused PD/T2 weighted images in detecting cervical spinal cord MS lesions. Material and Methods In this retrospective study, we selected a sample size of 50 MS patients. Using contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE), a digital image processing filter was used on the (PD/T2) fused images. The produced images were inspected and compared to the original PD images by two experienced neuroradiologists using interobserver and intraobserver. An ROI analysis was also performed on the processed and original PD images. Results The repeatability measurement of the match between the two examinations was highly consistent for both neuroradiologists. The repeatability for both neuroradiologists was 96.05%, and the error measurement was 3.95%. The reproducibility measurement of the neuroradiologist’s evaluation shows that the processed images could help to identify lesions better [excellent (84.87%)] than PD images [good (61.19%)]. ROIs analysis was performed on 113 MS lesions and normal areas in different images within the sample size. It revealed an enhanced ratio of 2.2 between MS lesions and normal spinal cord tissue in processed fused images compared to 1.34 in PD images. Conclusion The processed images of the fused images (PD/T2) have superior diagnostic sensitivity for MS lesions in the cervical spine than PD images alone.","PeriodicalId":72063,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20584601221105228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is considered a vital in depicting multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions. Current studies demonstrate that proton density (PD) weighted images (WI) are superior to T2 WI in detecting MS lesions (plaques) in the spinal cord. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic value of filtered fused PD/T2 weighted images in detecting cervical spinal cord MS lesions. Material and Methods In this retrospective study, we selected a sample size of 50 MS patients. Using contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE), a digital image processing filter was used on the (PD/T2) fused images. The produced images were inspected and compared to the original PD images by two experienced neuroradiologists using interobserver and intraobserver. An ROI analysis was also performed on the processed and original PD images. Results The repeatability measurement of the match between the two examinations was highly consistent for both neuroradiologists. The repeatability for both neuroradiologists was 96.05%, and the error measurement was 3.95%. The reproducibility measurement of the neuroradiologist’s evaluation shows that the processed images could help to identify lesions better [excellent (84.87%)] than PD images [good (61.19%)]. ROIs analysis was performed on 113 MS lesions and normal areas in different images within the sample size. It revealed an enhanced ratio of 2.2 between MS lesions and normal spinal cord tissue in processed fused images compared to 1.34 in PD images. Conclusion The processed images of the fused images (PD/T2) have superior diagnostic sensitivity for MS lesions in the cervical spine than PD images alone.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
滤波融合质子密度T2加权图像改善多发性硬化症颈脊髓病变检测
背景磁共振成像(MRI)被认为是描述多发性硬化症(MS)病变的重要手段。目前的研究表明,在检测脊髓多发性硬化病变(斑块)方面,质子密度(PD)加权图像(WI)优于T2 WI。目的评价滤波融合PD/T2加权图像对颈脊髓MS病变的诊断价值。材料和方法在这项回顾性研究中,我们选择了50名MS患者作为样本。利用对比度受限自适应直方图均衡(CLAHE),在(PD/T2)融合图像上使用数字图像处理滤波器。由两名经验丰富的神经放射科医生使用观察者间和观察者内检查生成的图像,并将其与原始PD图像进行比较。还对处理后的PD图像和原始PD图像进行了ROI分析。结果对两位神经放射科医生来说,两种检查之间匹配的重复性测量是高度一致的。两位神经放射科医生的重复性为96.05%,误差测量为3.95%。神经放射科医师评估的重复性测量表明,处理后的图像有助于比PD图像更好地识别病变[优秀(84.87%)][良好(61.19%)]。对样本量内不同图像中的113个MS病变和正常区域进行了ROI分析。它显示,在处理的融合图像中,MS病变和正常脊髓组织之间的比率为2.2,而在PD图像中为1.34。结论经处理的融合图像(PD/T2)对颈椎MS病变的诊断灵敏度高于单独的PD图像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Differential diagnosis between low-risk and high-risk thymoma: Comparison of diagnostic performance of radiologists with and without deep learning model. Computed tomography patterns and clinical outcomes of radiation pneumonitis in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Cranial nerves bridging the middle ear and cerebellum causing cerebellar peduncle abscess: A case report. Invasive trigeminal ganglioneuroma: A case report and review of the literature. A case of primary osteosarcoma in the occipital bone: A relatively common tumor in an uncommon location.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1