Your phone ruins our lunch: Attitudes, norms, and valuing the interaction predict phone use and phubbing in dyadic social interactions

IF 3.1 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Mobile Media & Communication Pub Date : 2021-12-23 DOI:10.1177/20501579211059914
C. Büttner, A. Gloster, Rainer Greifeneder
{"title":"Your phone ruins our lunch: Attitudes, norms, and valuing the interaction predict phone use and phubbing in dyadic social interactions","authors":"C. Büttner, A. Gloster, Rainer Greifeneder","doi":"10.1177/20501579211059914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phubbing—ignoring another person in order to use a smartphone instead—is an increasingly common behavior that disrupts interactions and harms relationships. Using the frameworks of the theory of planned behavior and an interaction value approach, we examined the driving factors of phubbing frequency. Four preregistered predictors were tested: attitudes toward phubbing, subjective norms of phubbing, interaction value, that is, the extent of valuing a social interaction, and the perceived interaction value of the partner. After having had lunch together, a total of 128 participants in 64 dyads filled out a survey assessing the four predictors. Dyadic linear mixed model analyses confirmed that a more positive attitude toward phubbing increases phubbing, as well as being phubbed. Moreover, we disentangled screen-sharing time (i.e., using a phone together), phone use, co-present phone use (i.e., using a phone alone), and phubbing: we found that valuing the social interaction more decreased phone use, but not phubbing, and holding more accepting subjective norms on phubbing increased co-present phone use, but not phone use in general. We further found that the person that used their phone first, phubbed more. Overall, this research extends our understanding of the factors driving phubbing and may be fruitfully harnessed to reduce phubbing.","PeriodicalId":46650,"journal":{"name":"Mobile Media & Communication","volume":"10 1","pages":"387 - 405"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mobile Media & Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579211059914","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Phubbing—ignoring another person in order to use a smartphone instead—is an increasingly common behavior that disrupts interactions and harms relationships. Using the frameworks of the theory of planned behavior and an interaction value approach, we examined the driving factors of phubbing frequency. Four preregistered predictors were tested: attitudes toward phubbing, subjective norms of phubbing, interaction value, that is, the extent of valuing a social interaction, and the perceived interaction value of the partner. After having had lunch together, a total of 128 participants in 64 dyads filled out a survey assessing the four predictors. Dyadic linear mixed model analyses confirmed that a more positive attitude toward phubbing increases phubbing, as well as being phubbed. Moreover, we disentangled screen-sharing time (i.e., using a phone together), phone use, co-present phone use (i.e., using a phone alone), and phubbing: we found that valuing the social interaction more decreased phone use, but not phubbing, and holding more accepting subjective norms on phubbing increased co-present phone use, but not phone use in general. We further found that the person that used their phone first, phubbed more. Overall, this research extends our understanding of the factors driving phubbing and may be fruitfully harnessed to reduce phubbing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你的手机毁了我们的午餐:态度、规范和对互动的重视可以预测二元社交中的电话使用和恶作剧
Phubing——为了使用智能手机而忽略另一个人——是一种越来越常见的行为,会扰乱互动并损害关系。利用计划行为理论和交互价值方法的框架,我们检验了phubbing频率的驱动因素。测试了四个预先注册的预测因素:对社交的态度、社交的主观规范、互动价值,即对社交互动的重视程度,以及伴侣的感知互动价值。在一起吃过午饭后,64对共128名参与者填写了一份调查,评估了四个预测因素。二元线性混合模型分析证实,对phubbing持更积极的态度会增加phubbining,也会被phubbind。此外,我们将屏幕共享时间(即一起使用手机)、手机使用、共同出现的手机使用(即单独使用手机)和phubbing分开:我们发现,更重视社交互动会减少手机使用,但不会减少phubbining,并且对phubbings持有更可接受的主观规范会增加共同出现的电话使用,但总体上不会增加手机使用。我们进一步发现,最先使用手机的人会说更多的话。总的来说,这项研究扩展了我们对驱鼠因素的理解,并可能被有效地利用来减少驱鼠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
16.30%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Mobile Media & Communication is a peer-reviewed forum for international, interdisciplinary academic research on the dynamic field of mobile media and communication. Mobile Media & Communication draws on a wide and continually renewed range of disciplines, engaging broadly in the concept of mobility itself.
期刊最新文献
How do smartphone users access the internet? An exploratory analysis of mobile web browser use Eco-Warrior: A theory-based mobile app intervention for forming and sustaining pro-environmental habits Off-grid? Resistant media operations by delivery gig workers in response to app-based tracking Ear buddies: A moderated mediation model of the effect of mobility on parasocial relationships with podcast hosts Sharing is caring: The positive role of smartphone co-use in social dynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1