I ain’t your f*cking Model Minority! Indexical orders of ‘Asianness’, class, and heteronormative masculinity

IF 2.1 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Applied Linguistics Review Pub Date : 2023-02-10 DOI:10.1515/applirev-2023-0021
Christian W. Chun
{"title":"I ain’t your f*cking Model Minority! Indexical orders of ‘Asianness’, class, and heteronormative masculinity","authors":"Christian W. Chun","doi":"10.1515/applirev-2023-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract By inscribing and ascribing particular indexical signifiers to people while ignoring and/or dismissing actual individual performative enactments and self-identifications, neoliberal multicultural discourses, in claiming tolerance and acceptance, frame racialized people as “an essentialized and totalized unit that is perceived to have little or no internal variation” (Ladson-Billings, Gloria. 2000. Racialized discourses and ethnic epistemologies. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn., 257–277. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage). In doing so, these discourses supposedly celebrating ‘diversity’ disregard the complexities, hybridities, and differences that constitute and are constitutive of any individual. Thus, in drawing on the ethos of tolerance and acceptance, ‘multicultural’ discourses paper over societal conflicts, internal divisions and oppressions, and homogenize racial, linguistic, and cultural identities ignoring the complex identifications people may perform and hold in any given interactional situational context. In this critical autoethnography, I illustrate how an indexical order of ‘Asianness’ in its ‘model minority’ variety has been shaped and subverted at times by my situated appropriations of various enregisterments (Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and social relations. Cambridge University Press) of a working-class heteronormative masculinity in interactional contexts. These enactments illuminate how an indexical order of an Asian American male has continually shifted and reacted to such positionings in a white supremacy society.","PeriodicalId":46472,"journal":{"name":"Applied Linguistics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Linguistics Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2023-0021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract By inscribing and ascribing particular indexical signifiers to people while ignoring and/or dismissing actual individual performative enactments and self-identifications, neoliberal multicultural discourses, in claiming tolerance and acceptance, frame racialized people as “an essentialized and totalized unit that is perceived to have little or no internal variation” (Ladson-Billings, Gloria. 2000. Racialized discourses and ethnic epistemologies. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn., 257–277. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage). In doing so, these discourses supposedly celebrating ‘diversity’ disregard the complexities, hybridities, and differences that constitute and are constitutive of any individual. Thus, in drawing on the ethos of tolerance and acceptance, ‘multicultural’ discourses paper over societal conflicts, internal divisions and oppressions, and homogenize racial, linguistic, and cultural identities ignoring the complex identifications people may perform and hold in any given interactional situational context. In this critical autoethnography, I illustrate how an indexical order of ‘Asianness’ in its ‘model minority’ variety has been shaped and subverted at times by my situated appropriations of various enregisterments (Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and social relations. Cambridge University Press) of a working-class heteronormative masculinity in interactional contexts. These enactments illuminate how an indexical order of an Asian American male has continually shifted and reacted to such positionings in a white supremacy society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我不是你那该死的模范少数派!“亚洲人”、阶级和非规范男性气质的索引顺序
摘要通过将特定的指数能指刻在人们身上并赋予他们,而忽视和/或忽视实际的个人表演行为和自我认同,新自由主义的多元文化话语,在声称宽容和接受时,将种族化的人定义为“一个本质化和整体化的单位,被认为几乎没有或根本没有内部变化”(Ladson Billings,Gloria.2000)。种族化话语和民族认识论。Norman K.Denzin和Yvonna S.Lincoln(编辑),《定性研究手册》,第2版。,257–277.千橡园,CA:Sage)。在这样做的过程中,这些所谓庆祝“多样性”的话语忽视了构成和构成任何个人的复杂性、混杂性和差异。因此,在借鉴宽容和接受的精神时,“多元文化”话语掩盖了社会冲突、内部分裂和压迫,并将种族、语言和文化身份同质化,忽略了人们在任何特定的互动情境中可能表现和持有的复杂身份。在这本批判性的民族志中,我阐述了“亚洲人”在其“模范少数民族”多样性中的指数顺序是如何被我对各种登记的定位拨款所塑造和颠覆的(Agha,Asif,2007)。语言和社会关系。剑桥大学出版社)关于互动环境中工人阶级非规范男性气质的研究。这些法令阐明了亚裔美国男性的指数秩序是如何在白人至上的社会中不断转变和应对这种地位的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
期刊最新文献
The role of speaker categorization in South Korean attitudes toward North Korean accents “As a Muslim…”: on the importance of intercultural responsibility in transnational cultural exchanges Culture machines Artificial intelligence and depth ontology: implications for intercultural ethics Exploring AI for intercultural communication: open conversation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1