Demonstrating the value of postgraduate fellowships for physicians in quality improvement and patient safety.

Quality & Safety in Health Care Pub Date : 2020-08-01 Epub Date: 2019-12-03 DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010204
Jennifer S Myers, Meghan Brooks Lane-Fall, Angela Ross Perfetti, Kate Humphrey, Luke Sato, Kathy N Shaw, April M Taylor, Anjala Tess
{"title":"Demonstrating the value of postgraduate fellowships for physicians in quality improvement and patient safety.","authors":"Jennifer S Myers,&nbsp;Meghan Brooks Lane-Fall,&nbsp;Angela Ross Perfetti,&nbsp;Kate Humphrey,&nbsp;Luke Sato,&nbsp;Kathy N Shaw,&nbsp;April M Taylor,&nbsp;Anjala Tess","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Academic fellowships in quality improvement (QI) and patient safety (PS) have emerged as one strategy to fill a need for physicians who possess this expertise. The authors aimed to characterise the impact of two such programmes on the graduates and their value to the institutions in which they are housed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2018, a qualitative study of two US QIPS postgraduate fellowship programmes was conducted. Graduates' demographics and titles were collected from programme files,while perspectives of the graduates and their institutional mentors were collected through individual interviews and analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight out of 31 graduates (90%) and 16 out of 17 (94%) mentors participated in the study across both institutions. At a median of 3 years (IQR 2-4) postgraduation, QIPS fellowship programme graduates' effort distribution was: 50% clinical care (IQR 30-61.8), 48% QIPS administration (IQR 20-60), 28% QIPS research (IQR 17.5-50) and 15% education (7.1-30.4). 68% of graduates were hired in the health system where they trained. Graduates described learning the requisite hard and soft skills to succeed in QIPS roles. Mentors described the impact of the programme on patient outcomes and increasing the acceptability of the field within academic medicine culture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Graduates from two QIPS fellowship programmes and their mentors perceive programmatic benefits related to individual career goal attainment and institutional impact. The results and conceptual framework presented here may be useful to other academic medical centres seeking to develop fellowships for advanced physician training programmes in QIPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":49653,"journal":{"name":"Quality & Safety in Health Care","volume":"29 1","pages":"645-654"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010204","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality & Safety in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Academic fellowships in quality improvement (QI) and patient safety (PS) have emerged as one strategy to fill a need for physicians who possess this expertise. The authors aimed to characterise the impact of two such programmes on the graduates and their value to the institutions in which they are housed.

Methods: In 2018, a qualitative study of two US QIPS postgraduate fellowship programmes was conducted. Graduates' demographics and titles were collected from programme files,while perspectives of the graduates and their institutional mentors were collected through individual interviews and analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: Twenty-eight out of 31 graduates (90%) and 16 out of 17 (94%) mentors participated in the study across both institutions. At a median of 3 years (IQR 2-4) postgraduation, QIPS fellowship programme graduates' effort distribution was: 50% clinical care (IQR 30-61.8), 48% QIPS administration (IQR 20-60), 28% QIPS research (IQR 17.5-50) and 15% education (7.1-30.4). 68% of graduates were hired in the health system where they trained. Graduates described learning the requisite hard and soft skills to succeed in QIPS roles. Mentors described the impact of the programme on patient outcomes and increasing the acceptability of the field within academic medicine culture.

Conclusion: Graduates from two QIPS fellowship programmes and their mentors perceive programmatic benefits related to individual career goal attainment and institutional impact. The results and conceptual framework presented here may be useful to other academic medical centres seeking to develop fellowships for advanced physician training programmes in QIPS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
展示研究生奖学金对医生在质量改善和患者安全方面的价值
质量改进(QI)和患者安全(PS)方面的学术奖学金已经成为填补对拥有这方面专业知识的医生需求的一种策略。作者旨在描述这两个项目对毕业生的影响,以及它们对他们所在机构的价值。方法2018年对两个美国QIPS研究生奖学金项目进行定性研究。毕业生的人口统计资料和职称从课程档案中收集,而毕业生及其机构导师的观点则通过个别访谈收集,并使用专题分析进行分析。结果31名毕业生中有28名(90%)和17名导师中有16名(94%)参与了两所大学的研究。在毕业后中位数3年(IQR 2-4), QIPS奖学金项目毕业生的努力分配为:50%的临床护理(IQR 30-61.8), 48%的QIPS管理(IQR 20-60), 28%的QIPS研究(IQR 17.5-50)和15%的教育(IQR 7.1-30.4)。68%的毕业生在接受培训的卫生系统找到了工作。毕业生描述了学习在QIPS角色中取得成功所需的硬技能和软技能。导师们描述了该项目对患者预后的影响,以及在学术医学文化中提高该领域的可接受性。结论:两个QIPS奖学金项目的毕业生及其导师认为项目收益与个人职业目标实现和机构影响有关。本文提出的结果和概念框架可能对寻求为QIPS的高级医生培训方案设立研究金的其他学术医疗中心有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quality & Safety in Health Care
Quality & Safety in Health Care 医学-卫生保健
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of telephone triage for predicting adverse outcomes in suspected COVID-19: an observational cohort study. Quality framework for remote antenatal care: qualitative study with women, healthcare professionals and system-level stakeholders. Addressing social determinants of health in primary care: a quasi-experimental study using unannounced standardised patients to evaluate the impact of audit/feedback on physicians' rates of identifying and responding to social needs. Reporting on implementation trials with null findings: the need for concurrent process evaluation reporting. Antibiotic documentation: death by a thousand clicks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1