The Effects of Social Distancing Measures on COVID-19 Spreads in European Countries

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS Review of Economic Perspectives Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.2478/revecp-2023-0004
Martin Pažický
{"title":"The Effects of Social Distancing Measures on COVID-19 Spreads in European Countries","authors":"Martin Pažický","doi":"10.2478/revecp-2023-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study investigates the effects of social distancing measures on various types of social mobility, using country- and day-fixed effects on a panel of daily data comprising 29 European countries. Although social distancing measures proved to be significant for all types of mobility in the examined period, they are best captured by retail and recreation mobility. Linear effects of restrictive measures on COVID-19 cases and deaths are examined by OLS regression with country- and day-fixed effects on a panel of 29 European countries, while non-linear effects were investigated by quantile regressions. Stricter mobility restrictions significantly reduced COVID-19 cases and deaths, but the variant of the virus was also an important determinant. Although the Delta variant was much more infectious, its mortality reduced. However, the impact of social distancing measures on COVID-19 cases and deaths was not constant but strengthened with increasing quantiles of the distribution of cases and deaths, suggesting that an early response from policy-makers was very important. Vaccination brought benefits for both cases and deaths, but a particularly beneficial effect can be seen on COVID-19 deaths. The vaccination benefits grew with the share of the vaccinated population. Distrust in public institutions proved to have a negative impact on both COVID-19 cases and deaths. The inclusion of a set of control variables (health, economic, social and demographic) revealed that country characteristics such as cardiovascular mortality, the share of male smokers, economic development, the proportion of the population living in extreme poverty, population density, the quality of education or the share of rural population were important determinants of COVID-19 spreads. The analysis of the linear and nonlinear effects of the stringency of measures on various categories of sales according to the digital cash collection system (eKasa) in Slovakia revealed that sales in essential sectors for consumers, such as retail and grocery stores, were relatively resistant to tightening measures, while sectors that are less essential for consumers were more sensitive to social distancing measures.","PeriodicalId":43002,"journal":{"name":"Review of Economic Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Economic Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/revecp-2023-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the effects of social distancing measures on various types of social mobility, using country- and day-fixed effects on a panel of daily data comprising 29 European countries. Although social distancing measures proved to be significant for all types of mobility in the examined period, they are best captured by retail and recreation mobility. Linear effects of restrictive measures on COVID-19 cases and deaths are examined by OLS regression with country- and day-fixed effects on a panel of 29 European countries, while non-linear effects were investigated by quantile regressions. Stricter mobility restrictions significantly reduced COVID-19 cases and deaths, but the variant of the virus was also an important determinant. Although the Delta variant was much more infectious, its mortality reduced. However, the impact of social distancing measures on COVID-19 cases and deaths was not constant but strengthened with increasing quantiles of the distribution of cases and deaths, suggesting that an early response from policy-makers was very important. Vaccination brought benefits for both cases and deaths, but a particularly beneficial effect can be seen on COVID-19 deaths. The vaccination benefits grew with the share of the vaccinated population. Distrust in public institutions proved to have a negative impact on both COVID-19 cases and deaths. The inclusion of a set of control variables (health, economic, social and demographic) revealed that country characteristics such as cardiovascular mortality, the share of male smokers, economic development, the proportion of the population living in extreme poverty, population density, the quality of education or the share of rural population were important determinants of COVID-19 spreads. The analysis of the linear and nonlinear effects of the stringency of measures on various categories of sales according to the digital cash collection system (eKasa) in Slovakia revealed that sales in essential sectors for consumers, such as retail and grocery stores, were relatively resistant to tightening measures, while sectors that are less essential for consumers were more sensitive to social distancing measures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会距离措施对欧洲国家COVID-19传播的影响
本研究调查了社会距离措施对各种类型的社会流动性的影响,利用包括29个欧洲国家在内的日常数据面板的国家和日固定效应。尽管在研究期间,社会距离措施被证明对所有类型的流动性都很重要,但它们最能体现在零售和娱乐流动性上。在一个由29个欧洲国家组成的小组中,通过OLS回归研究了限制性措施对COVID-19病例和死亡的线性影响,其中包括国家和日期固定效应,而通过分位数回归研究了非线性影响。更严格的流动性限制大大减少了COVID-19病例和死亡人数,但病毒的变体也是一个重要的决定因素。尽管德尔塔变种的传染性更强,但其死亡率降低了。然而,保持社会距离措施对COVID-19病例和死亡的影响不是恒定的,而是随着病例和死亡分布分位数的增加而增强,这表明政策制定者的早期反应非常重要。疫苗接种对病例和死亡都有好处,但对COVID-19的死亡有特别有益的影响。接种疫苗的好处随着接种人口比例的增加而增加。事实证明,对公共机构的不信任对新冠肺炎病例和死亡人数都产生了负面影响。纳入一组控制变量(健康、经济、社会和人口)表明,心血管死亡率、男性吸烟者比例、经济发展、极端贫困人口比例、人口密度、教育质量或农村人口比例等国家特征是COVID-19传播的重要决定因素。根据斯洛伐克数字现金收集系统(eKasa)对严格措施对各类销售的线性和非线性影响进行的分析表明,零售和杂货店等消费者必需部门的销售对紧缩措施的抵抗力相对较强,而对消费者不那么必需的部门对社会距离措施更为敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efficiency Analysis of Elementary Schools in Bratislava – A Two Step DEA Approach Comparison of Housing Affordability in Czech and Polish Regions The contribution of renewable energy sector value added to the national economic development in Denmark: an empirical analysis The Impact of Project Management Tools on Project Results: Evaluation of a Survey Among Managers Leading International Development Projects for four selected Central and Eastern European Donors Tony Lawson on money
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1