Preferences, Substitutes, and Complements: Mapping the Relationship between Data Sources within Teachers’ Instructional Practice

IF 2.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Assessment Pub Date : 2022-06-28 DOI:10.1080/10627197.2022.2088493
Austin S. Jennings
{"title":"Preferences, Substitutes, and Complements: Mapping the Relationship between Data Sources within Teachers’ Instructional Practice","authors":"Austin S. Jennings","doi":"10.1080/10627197.2022.2088493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The extent to which teachers collect, interpret, and use information from multiple data sources is a key distinction between novice and expert data users. Understanding and exploring this dimension of teachers’ instructional decision making requires a shift in contemporary perspectives toward the interconnectedness of data sources within teachers’ practice of data use. In the present study, I develop and apply a conceptual framework for mapping the structure of connections between data sources within and across instructional practices. Findings indicate teachers typically use two to six data sources in the context of a given instructional practice, with considerable variation in the relationship between those data sources across instructional practices. Toward this end, the present study advances a typology for classifying teachers’ preference for, substitution between, and complementary use of data sources. Findings have implications for preservice teacher preparation, in-service teacher professional learning, and research perspectives on data use in education.","PeriodicalId":46209,"journal":{"name":"Educational Assessment","volume":"27 1","pages":"322 - 338"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2022.2088493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT The extent to which teachers collect, interpret, and use information from multiple data sources is a key distinction between novice and expert data users. Understanding and exploring this dimension of teachers’ instructional decision making requires a shift in contemporary perspectives toward the interconnectedness of data sources within teachers’ practice of data use. In the present study, I develop and apply a conceptual framework for mapping the structure of connections between data sources within and across instructional practices. Findings indicate teachers typically use two to six data sources in the context of a given instructional practice, with considerable variation in the relationship between those data sources across instructional practices. Toward this end, the present study advances a typology for classifying teachers’ preference for, substitution between, and complementary use of data sources. Findings have implications for preservice teacher preparation, in-service teacher professional learning, and research perspectives on data use in education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
偏好、替代与补充:教师教学实践中数据来源关系的映射
教师从多个数据源收集、解释和使用信息的程度是新手和专家数据用户之间的关键区别。理解和探索教师教学决策的这一维度需要从当代视角转向教师数据使用实践中数据源的互联性。在本研究中,我开发并应用了一个概念框架,用于映射教学实践内部和跨教学实践的数据源之间的连接结构。研究结果表明,教师通常在给定的教学实践中使用两到六个数据源,这些数据源之间的关系在教学实践中存在相当大的差异。为此,本研究提出了一种类型来分类教师对数据源的偏好、替代和补充使用。研究结果对职前教师的准备、在职教师的专业学习以及数据在教育中的使用的研究前景具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Assessment
Educational Assessment EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Educational Assessment publishes original research and scholarship on the assessment of individuals, groups, and programs in educational settings. It includes theory, methodological approaches and empirical research in the appraisal of the learning and achievement of students and teachers, young children and adults, and novices and experts. The journal reports on current large-scale testing practices, discusses alternative approaches, presents scholarship on classroom assessment practices and includes assessment topics debated at the national level. It welcomes both conceptual and empirical pieces and encourages articles that provide a strong bridge between theory and/or empirical research and the implications for educational policy and/or practice.
期刊最新文献
Dialect and Mathematics Performance in African American Children Who Use AAE: Insights from Explanatory IRT and Error Analysis Raising the Bar: How Revising an English Language Proficiency Assessment for Initial English Learner Classification Affects Students’ Later Academic Achievements Monitoring Rater Quality in Observational Systems: Issues Due to Unreliable Estimates of Rater Quality Improving the Precision of Classroom Observation Scores Using a Multi-Rater and Multi-Timepoint Item Response Theory Model High Stakes Assessments in Primary Schools and Teachers’ Anxiety About Work
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1