Cortical Thickness Is Related to Variability in Heritage Bilingual Language Proficiency.

IF 1.9 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY Translational Issues in Psychological Science Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-24 DOI:10.1037/tps0000362
My V H Nguyen, Kelly A Vaughn, Hannah Claussenius-Kalman, Pilar Archila-Suerte, Arturo E Hernandez
{"title":"Cortical Thickness Is Related to Variability in Heritage Bilingual Language Proficiency.","authors":"My V H Nguyen, Kelly A Vaughn, Hannah Claussenius-Kalman, Pilar Archila-Suerte, Arturo E Hernandez","doi":"10.1037/tps0000362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research suggests that bilingual experience is associated with gray matter changes, such that initial language gains are associated with expansion and language expertise is associated with renormalization. Previous studies on language proficiency development primarily focused on between-subjects, quasiexperimental comparisons of monolinguals and bilinguals. This study proposes a new paradigm to examine language expertise and cortical thickness within heritage bilinguals (<i>n</i> = 215), as well as between bilinguals and monolinguals (<i>n</i> = 145), using data combined from eight previous magnetic resonance imaging studies. In general, results highlight variability within bilinguals, finding relationships between cortical thickness and English proficiency that are relatively consistent within monolinguals, but inconsistent within bilinguals. In all participants, higher levels of proficiency in English-monolinguals' only language and bilinguals' second but stronger language-were negatively related to cortical thickness. In bilinguals, higher proficiency in the weaker, albeit first learned, language was positively related to cortical thickness. Moreover, there was an interaction between language group and English proficiency in predicting cortical thickness, such that the relationship between proficiency and thickness was stronger in monolinguals than in bilinguals. Findings also demonstrate that the regions associated with language expertise differ between bilinguals and monolinguals. Future directions for cognitive-developmental neuroscience research in bilinguals are suggested, particularly the longitudinal examination of cortical changes in relation to bilingual experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":29959,"journal":{"name":"Translational Issues in Psychological Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10732586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Issues in Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research suggests that bilingual experience is associated with gray matter changes, such that initial language gains are associated with expansion and language expertise is associated with renormalization. Previous studies on language proficiency development primarily focused on between-subjects, quasiexperimental comparisons of monolinguals and bilinguals. This study proposes a new paradigm to examine language expertise and cortical thickness within heritage bilinguals (n = 215), as well as between bilinguals and monolinguals (n = 145), using data combined from eight previous magnetic resonance imaging studies. In general, results highlight variability within bilinguals, finding relationships between cortical thickness and English proficiency that are relatively consistent within monolinguals, but inconsistent within bilinguals. In all participants, higher levels of proficiency in English-monolinguals' only language and bilinguals' second but stronger language-were negatively related to cortical thickness. In bilinguals, higher proficiency in the weaker, albeit first learned, language was positively related to cortical thickness. Moreover, there was an interaction between language group and English proficiency in predicting cortical thickness, such that the relationship between proficiency and thickness was stronger in monolinguals than in bilinguals. Findings also demonstrate that the regions associated with language expertise differ between bilinguals and monolinguals. Future directions for cognitive-developmental neuroscience research in bilinguals are suggested, particularly the longitudinal examination of cortical changes in relation to bilingual experiences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
皮层厚度与传统双语能力的变异有关。
研究表明,双语经验与灰质的变化有关,比如最初的语言进步与扩展有关,而语言专长则与再正常化有关。以往关于语言能力发展的研究主要集中于单语和双语的主体间、准实验比较。本研究提出了一种新的范式,利用之前八项磁共振成像研究的数据,研究遗产双语者(n = 215)的语言专长和皮层厚度,以及双语者和单语者(n = 145)之间的语言专长和皮层厚度。总体而言,研究结果凸显了双语者内部的变异性,发现皮层厚度与英语水平之间的关系在单语者内部相对一致,但在双语者内部却不一致。在所有参与者中,英语水平越高(单语者的唯一语言和双语者的第二语言但更强的语言)与皮层厚度呈负相关。在双语者中,较弱的语言(尽管是最先学会的语言)的熟练程度越高,皮层厚度越大。此外,在预测大脑皮层厚度方面,语言组别和英语熟练程度之间存在交互作用,因此熟练程度和厚度之间的关系在单语者中比在双语者中更强。研究结果还表明,与语言专长相关的区域在双语者和单语者之间存在差异。研究还提出了双语者认知发展神经科学研究的未来方向,特别是与双语经历相关的皮层变化的纵向研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Supplemental Material for Telehealth Perceptions and Experiences of Persons With Parkinson’s Disease During the COVID-19 Pandemic Supplemental Material for More Questions Than Answers: Ethical Considerations at the Intersection of Psychology and Generative Artificial Intelligence Supplemental Material for Overheard and Understood: A Systematic Review of Children’s Learning From Overhearing Social cohesion and volunteering: Correlates, causes, and challenges. Psychology and social cohesion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1