Validity of trans-perineum ultrasonic surveillance of percentage change in the levator ani hiatal antro posterior diameter for the diagnosis of pelvic floor muscle dysfunction

Xiao-duo Wen, Haiyan Tian, Xiaojing Yan, Cuiqin Sun, Yi Yang
{"title":"Validity of trans-perineum ultrasonic surveillance of percentage change in the levator ani hiatal antro posterior diameter for the diagnosis of pelvic floor muscle dysfunction","authors":"Xiao-duo Wen, Haiyan Tian, Xiaojing Yan, Cuiqin Sun, Yi Yang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN131148-20190813-00484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo assess the validity of ultrasonic surveillance of percentage change in the levator ani hiatal antro posterior diameter (LHap) in the diagnosis of pelvic floor muscle dysfunction. \n \n \nMethods \nTwo hundred and forty seven women suspected to have pelvic floor disorder related symptoms from January to December 2017 were enrolled. Digital palpation of the puborectalis muscle using modified Oxford score grading system (MOS) was performed.Women with MOS point of 0, 1, 2, or 3 were defined as having low pubic floor muscle contraction (LPFMC), and those with MOS point of 4 or 5 were defined as having normal pubic floor muscle contraction (NPFMC). Then ultrasound measurement of LHap diameter at rest, at maximum contraction, and at the maximum Valsalva were performed in all women to calculate the percentage decrease on contraction (PDC%) and percentage increase on Valsalva (PIV%). Statistical analysis was performed to test the significance of differences in PDC% and PIV% between the LPFMC group and NPFMC group, and the ROC curve analysis was performed to evaluate the validity of using PDC% and PIV% for predicting LPFMC. \n \n \nResults \nCompared with the NPFMC group, the PIV% of LPFMC group was significantly larger [(6.07±4.20)% vs (11.29±10.49)%, P 5.19% predicted LPFMC with sensitivity 71.43%, specificity 57.89%, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.69. A cut-off of PDC% 5.19% and PDC%<25.37%, the sensitivity was 84.55%, the specificity was 55.00%, and area under ROC was 0.70. \n \n \nConclusions \nUltrasonic measurement of percentage change in the LHap diameter is valuable for the diagnosis of pelvic floor muscle dysfunction. \n \n \nKey words: \nUltrasonography; Pelvic floor muscle dysfunction; Levator ani hiatal antro posterior diameter","PeriodicalId":10224,"journal":{"name":"中华超声影像学杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华超声影像学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN131148-20190813-00484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To assess the validity of ultrasonic surveillance of percentage change in the levator ani hiatal antro posterior diameter (LHap) in the diagnosis of pelvic floor muscle dysfunction. Methods Two hundred and forty seven women suspected to have pelvic floor disorder related symptoms from January to December 2017 were enrolled. Digital palpation of the puborectalis muscle using modified Oxford score grading system (MOS) was performed.Women with MOS point of 0, 1, 2, or 3 were defined as having low pubic floor muscle contraction (LPFMC), and those with MOS point of 4 or 5 were defined as having normal pubic floor muscle contraction (NPFMC). Then ultrasound measurement of LHap diameter at rest, at maximum contraction, and at the maximum Valsalva were performed in all women to calculate the percentage decrease on contraction (PDC%) and percentage increase on Valsalva (PIV%). Statistical analysis was performed to test the significance of differences in PDC% and PIV% between the LPFMC group and NPFMC group, and the ROC curve analysis was performed to evaluate the validity of using PDC% and PIV% for predicting LPFMC. Results Compared with the NPFMC group, the PIV% of LPFMC group was significantly larger [(6.07±4.20)% vs (11.29±10.49)%, P 5.19% predicted LPFMC with sensitivity 71.43%, specificity 57.89%, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.69. A cut-off of PDC% 5.19% and PDC%<25.37%, the sensitivity was 84.55%, the specificity was 55.00%, and area under ROC was 0.70. Conclusions Ultrasonic measurement of percentage change in the LHap diameter is valuable for the diagnosis of pelvic floor muscle dysfunction. Key words: Ultrasonography; Pelvic floor muscle dysfunction; Levator ani hiatal antro posterior diameter
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经会阴超声监测肛门提肌裂孔窦后径百分比变化对盆底肌功能障碍诊断的有效性
目的探讨超声监测提肛后孔内径百分比变化对盆底肌功能障碍的诊断价值。方法选取2017年1月至12月怀疑有盆底障碍相关症状的247名女性。采用改良的牛津评分系统(MOS)对耻骨直肠肌进行数字触诊。MOS值为0、1、2或3的女性被定义为低阴底肌收缩(LPFMC),而MOS值为4或5的女性被定义为正常阴底肌收缩(NPFMC)。然后对所有女性进行静息、最大收缩和最大Valsalva时的LHap直径超声测量,计算收缩减少百分比(PDC%)和Valsalva增加百分比(PIV%)。采用统计学方法检验PDC%和PIV%在LPFMC组与NPFMC组之间的差异的显著性,并采用ROC曲线分析评价PDC%和PIV%预测LPFMC的有效性。结果与NPFMC组比较,LPFMC组PIV%((6.07±4.20)% vs(11.29±10.49)%,P 5.19%预测LPFMC的敏感性为71.43%,特异性为57.89%,ROC曲线下面积为0.69。截止系数为PDC% 5.19%, PDC%<25.37%,敏感性为84.55%,特异性为55.00%,ROC下面积为0.70。结论超声测量LHap直径百分率变化对盆底肌功能障碍的诊断有一定价值。关键词:超声检查;盆底肌功能障碍;提肛孔前后直径
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华超声影像学杂志
中华超声影像学杂志 Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9126
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound-guided pathological sampling of cadaver lung tissue in cases of COVID-19 Ultrasound-guided post-mortem tissue sampling in the autopsy of COVID-19 cases: a pilot study The clinical value of ultrasound in the assessment of the severity of COVID-19 Study of positioning of fetal conus medullaris by detecting atlanto-axial intervertebral space with three-dimensional ultrasound Prenatal ultrasound diagnostic clues of congenital dislocation of the knee
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1