Does gallbladder polyp size as measured using radiographic modalities predict pathological size in all types of polyps?

Q3 Medicine Reports in Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2018-10-01 DOI:10.2147/RMI.S172125
J. Thammaroj, Piti Ungarreevittaya, Kriangsak Jenwitheesuk
{"title":"Does gallbladder polyp size as measured using radiographic modalities predict pathological size in all types of polyps?","authors":"J. Thammaroj, Piti Ungarreevittaya, Kriangsak Jenwitheesuk","doi":"10.2147/RMI.S172125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Gallbladder polyps can be classified into two main types: cholesterol and adenoma. As polyp size is reported to be a factor suggestive for malignant polyps, this study aimed to evaluate whether radiographic size or any clinical factors are predictive of the pathological size of polyps. Methods: This was a cross-sectional analytical study. The inclusion criteria were that patients had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy, had been diagnosed with gallbladder polyps using any radiographic modality, and had available pathological results. A clinical predictive model for pathological polyp size was calculated using multivariate linear regression analysis. Results: During the study period, there were 85 patients who met the study criteria. The average polyp size according to radiographic modalities was slightly larger than average (7.2 vs 5.6 mm). The majority of polyps were cholesterol polyps (66; 77.6%). The sizes of the polyps according to radiographic imaging were significantly associated with the pathological sizes of the polyps. Age was another significant factor related to the size of polyps identified using pathological methods in the adenoma group, with a coefficient of 0.264 ( P = 0.021). Conclusions: Gallbladder polyp size as determined using radiographic modalities can predict the pathological size in both cholesterol and adenoma polyps. Some adjustments are needed, particularly in patients with adenoma polyps.","PeriodicalId":39053,"journal":{"name":"Reports in Medical Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/RMI.S172125","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports in Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMI.S172125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Gallbladder polyps can be classified into two main types: cholesterol and adenoma. As polyp size is reported to be a factor suggestive for malignant polyps, this study aimed to evaluate whether radiographic size or any clinical factors are predictive of the pathological size of polyps. Methods: This was a cross-sectional analytical study. The inclusion criteria were that patients had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy, had been diagnosed with gallbladder polyps using any radiographic modality, and had available pathological results. A clinical predictive model for pathological polyp size was calculated using multivariate linear regression analysis. Results: During the study period, there were 85 patients who met the study criteria. The average polyp size according to radiographic modalities was slightly larger than average (7.2 vs 5.6 mm). The majority of polyps were cholesterol polyps (66; 77.6%). The sizes of the polyps according to radiographic imaging were significantly associated with the pathological sizes of the polyps. Age was another significant factor related to the size of polyps identified using pathological methods in the adenoma group, with a coefficient of 0.264 ( P = 0.021). Conclusions: Gallbladder polyp size as determined using radiographic modalities can predict the pathological size in both cholesterol and adenoma polyps. Some adjustments are needed, particularly in patients with adenoma polyps.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用放射学方法测量胆囊息肉的大小是否能预测所有类型息肉的病理大小?
背景:胆囊息肉可分为两种主要类型:胆固醇和腺瘤。据报道,息肉大小是提示恶性息肉的一个因素,本研究旨在评估放射学大小或任何临床因素是否可以预测息肉的病理大小。方法:这是一项横断面分析研究。纳入标准是,患者接受过腹腔镜胆囊切除术,使用任何放射学方法诊断为胆囊息肉,并有可用的病理结果。使用多元线性回归分析计算病理性息肉大小的临床预测模型。结果:在研究期间,有85名患者符合研究标准。根据影像学检查,息肉的平均大小略大于平均值(7.2 vs 5.6 mm)。大多数息肉是胆固醇息肉(66;77.6%)。根据放射学成像,息肉的大小与息肉的病理大小显著相关。年龄是另一个与腺瘤组中使用病理方法确定的息肉大小相关的重要因素,系数为0.264(P=0.021)。结论:使用放射学方法确定的胆囊息肉大小可以预测胆固醇和腺瘤息肉的病理大小。需要进行一些调整,尤其是腺瘤息肉患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reports in Medical Imaging
Reports in Medical Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of Magnetic Field Inhomogeneity on the Quality of Magnetic Resonance Images and Compensation Techniques: A Review Lung Perfusion Assessment in Pulmonary Embolism: Novel Semi-Automatic Lung Perfusion Software in Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography Compared to Traditional Lung Perfusion Scintigraphy Nurses’ Roles in Managing Patient Anxiety Before MRI Scans Using Informative Video A “Double” Third Window Syndrome: The Case of Semicircular Canal Dehiscence in Twin Sisters Diagnostic Value of Perfusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as an Adjunct to Routine Magnetic Resonance Protocols for Adults Presenting with Acute Ischemic Stroke
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1