Assessment of an online piloted module targeted toward home-based food operators in Iowa

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Food Science Education Pub Date : 2020-06-15 DOI:10.1111/1541-4329.12196
Tarah Temen, Nadia Jaramillo Cherrez, Shannon Coleman
{"title":"Assessment of an online piloted module targeted toward home-based food operators in Iowa","authors":"Tarah Temen,&nbsp;Nadia Jaramillo Cherrez,&nbsp;Shannon Coleman","doi":"10.1111/1541-4329.12196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding safe food practice is important for home-based food operators to prevent foodborne illness. Earlier work has found that home-based food operators lack food safety knowledge and may benefit from training that is specifically tailored to their needs. Unfortunately, home-based food operators may be deterred from enrolling in traditional educational formats due to their busy schedules. The objective of this study was to pilot and evaluate the effectiveness of an online food safety education module for home-based food operators in Iowa through three learning assessments. Twenty-one participants enrolled in a blended workshop in which participants completed one online module before attending a face-to-face session where they completed the remaining five modules. The effectiveness of the online module was measured by examining the first-attempt average scores on learning assessments, the number of assessment attempts required to achieve 100%, and the first-attempt performance by question type. The three learning assessment tools resulted in first-attempt averages of approximately 86%, 90%, and 83%, surpassing our standard of effectiveness of 75% and showing good potential for the online format. The learning assessment attempt numbers of 4.65, 1.67, and 3.81 showed difficulty with knowledge transfer for some topics. Comprehension and analysis-style questions had first-attempt success rates of approximately 85% and 88%, respectively. Scores on knowledge and application-style questions were lower with first-attempt success rates of approximately 80% and 75%, respectively. These findings were used to improve the first online module and guide the transition of the remaining five modules to the online format.</p>","PeriodicalId":44041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1541-4329.12196","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4329.12196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding safe food practice is important for home-based food operators to prevent foodborne illness. Earlier work has found that home-based food operators lack food safety knowledge and may benefit from training that is specifically tailored to their needs. Unfortunately, home-based food operators may be deterred from enrolling in traditional educational formats due to their busy schedules. The objective of this study was to pilot and evaluate the effectiveness of an online food safety education module for home-based food operators in Iowa through three learning assessments. Twenty-one participants enrolled in a blended workshop in which participants completed one online module before attending a face-to-face session where they completed the remaining five modules. The effectiveness of the online module was measured by examining the first-attempt average scores on learning assessments, the number of assessment attempts required to achieve 100%, and the first-attempt performance by question type. The three learning assessment tools resulted in first-attempt averages of approximately 86%, 90%, and 83%, surpassing our standard of effectiveness of 75% and showing good potential for the online format. The learning assessment attempt numbers of 4.65, 1.67, and 3.81 showed difficulty with knowledge transfer for some topics. Comprehension and analysis-style questions had first-attempt success rates of approximately 85% and 88%, respectively. Scores on knowledge and application-style questions were lower with first-attempt success rates of approximately 80% and 75%, respectively. These findings were used to improve the first online module and guide the transition of the remaining five modules to the online format.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对爱荷华州家庭食品经营者的在线试点模块评估
了解安全食品操作对于家庭食品经营者预防食源性疾病非常重要。早期的工作发现,家庭食品经营者缺乏食品安全知识,可以从专门针对其需要的培训中受益。不幸的是,由于他们繁忙的日程安排,家庭食品经营者可能会被传统的教育形式所阻止。本研究的目的是通过三个学习评估,试点和评估爱荷华州家庭食品经营者在线食品安全教育模块的有效性。21名参与者参加了一个混合研讨会,参与者在参加面对面会议之前完成了一个在线模块,其中他们完成了剩余的五个模块。在线模块的有效性是通过检查学习评估的第一次平均得分、达到100%所需的评估尝试次数和按问题类型的第一次尝试表现来衡量的。这三种学习评估工具的第一次尝试平均效果约为86%,90%和83%,超过了我们75%的有效性标准,显示出在线格式的良好潜力。学习评估尝试数分别为4.65、1.67和3.81,表明部分主题存在知识转移困难。理解型和分析型问题的第一次尝试成功率分别约为85%和88%。知识型和应用型问题的得分较低,第一次尝试的成功率分别约为80%和75%。这些发现被用来改进第一个在线模块,并指导其余五个模块过渡到在线格式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Science Education
Journal of Food Science Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Institute of Food Technologists (IFT) publishes the Journal of Food Science Education (JFSE) to serve the interest of its members in the field of food science education at all levels. The journal is aimed at all those committed to the improvement of food science education, including primary, secondary, undergraduate and graduate, continuing, and workplace education. It serves as an international forum for scholarly and innovative development in all aspects of food science education for "teachers" (individuals who facilitate, mentor, or instruct) and "students" (individuals who are the focus of learning efforts).
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Flipped laboratory classes: Student performance and perceptions in undergraduate food science and technology Next steps Student perspectives of various learning approaches used in an undergraduate food science and technology subject Grab the opportunity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1