Risk assessment model for endpoints of ischemic stroke: A study protocol for a registry study

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine Pub Date : 2018-12-15 DOI:10.1016/S0254-6272(18)30994-4
Zhang Yin , Liu Yue , Wang Guiqian , Sun Shuailing , Gao Yang , Xie Yanming
{"title":"Risk assessment model for endpoints of ischemic stroke: A study protocol for a registry study","authors":"Zhang Yin ,&nbsp;Liu Yue ,&nbsp;Wang Guiqian ,&nbsp;Sun Shuailing ,&nbsp;Gao Yang ,&nbsp;Xie Yanming","doi":"10.1016/S0254-6272(18)30994-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>To evaluate the risk of ischemic stroke endpoints by establishing risk assessment models that combine Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) and modern medicine indicators.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS/DESIGN</h3><p>The proposed study is a registry-based participant survey conducted in seven hospitals nationwide in China. After obtaining informed consent, 3000 patients diagnosed with ischemic stroke will be recruited. One-year follow-ups will be performed on-site in hospitals and by telephone to track endpoint events. Comparative analysis of the prevalence of endpoint events and other TCM or modern medicine features in different groups will be conducted using frequency analysis and χ<span><sup>2</sup></span> tests, and the results will be expressed as composition ratios. Comparative analysis of quantitative scores and related patterns or symptoms will be conducted using a rank-sum test. Correlation analysis of endpoint events and TCM or modern medicine factors will be performed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model.</p></div><div><h3>DISCUSSION</h3><p>Previous reports have described modern medicine indicator-based risk assessment models for ischemic stroke endpoint events, but no such studies have included TCM features. Our new risk assessment model combines TCM and modern medicine indicators and thus has the potential to facilitate early warning, early intervention, and early control of ischemic stroke endpoint events.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine","volume":"38 6","pages":"Pages 936-942"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0254-6272(18)30994-4","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0254627218309944","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of ischemic stroke endpoints by establishing risk assessment models that combine Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) and modern medicine indicators.

METHODS/DESIGN

The proposed study is a registry-based participant survey conducted in seven hospitals nationwide in China. After obtaining informed consent, 3000 patients diagnosed with ischemic stroke will be recruited. One-year follow-ups will be performed on-site in hospitals and by telephone to track endpoint events. Comparative analysis of the prevalence of endpoint events and other TCM or modern medicine features in different groups will be conducted using frequency analysis and χ2 tests, and the results will be expressed as composition ratios. Comparative analysis of quantitative scores and related patterns or symptoms will be conducted using a rank-sum test. Correlation analysis of endpoint events and TCM or modern medicine factors will be performed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model.

DISCUSSION

Previous reports have described modern medicine indicator-based risk assessment models for ischemic stroke endpoint events, but no such studies have included TCM features. Our new risk assessment model combines TCM and modern medicine indicators and thus has the potential to facilitate early warning, early intervention, and early control of ischemic stroke endpoint events.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缺血性卒中终点的风险评估模型:一项注册研究的研究方案
目的建立中医指标与现代医学指标相结合的缺血性脑卒中终点风险评估模型,评价缺血性脑卒中终点风险。方法/设计本研究是一项基于登记的参与者调查,在中国7家医院进行。在获得知情同意后,将招募3000名诊断为缺血性卒中的患者。将在医院现场进行为期一年的随访,并通过电话跟踪终点事件。采用频率分析和χ2检验对不同组的终点事件发生率及其他中医或现代医学特征进行比较分析,结果以构成比表示。将使用秩和检验对定量分数和相关模式或症状进行比较分析。终点事件与中医或现代医学因素的相关性分析将使用多变量Cox比例风险模型进行。先前的报告描述了基于现代医学指标的缺血性卒中终点事件风险评估模型,但没有此类研究包括中医特征。我们的新风险评估模型结合了中医和现代医学指标,具有促进缺血性脑卒中终点事件早期预警、早期干预和早期控制的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
32269
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine(JTCM) is devoted to clinical and theortical research on the use of acupuncture and Oriental medicine. The main columns include Clinical Observations, Basic Investigations, Reviews, Questions and Answers, an Expert''s Forum, and Discussions of Clinical Cases. Its key topics include acupuncture and electro-acupuncture, herbal medicine, homeopathy, masseotherapy, mind-body therapies, palliative care, and other CAM therapies.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Shenqi Yangxin decoction on high mobility group box 1 and inflammatory signal pathway in a rat model of dilated cardiomyopathy Involvement of heme oxygenase-1 induction in anti-vascular inflammation effects of Xanthoceras sorbifolia in human umbilical vein endothelial cells Possible mechanism underlying analgesic effect of Tuina in rats may involve piezo mechanosensitive channels within dorsal root ganglia axon Effect of Jianpi Bushen formula on aromatase-inhibitor-associated bone loss after menopause Effect of Cuzhi liquid on learning and memory dysfunction in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1