Comparison of Commercial Dechlorination Chemicals used in Reverse Osmosis Processes

Zi Sue Yoon, Wontae Lee
{"title":"Comparison of Commercial Dechlorination Chemicals used in Reverse Osmosis Processes","authors":"Zi Sue Yoon, Wontae Lee","doi":"10.4491/ksee.2022.44.4.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives : The objective of this study was to find a promising dechlorination chemical which can replace sodium bisulfite (SBS), which is mainly used as a dechlorination agent in reverse osmosis processes but can cause odor issues.Methods : Candidate chemicals were selected in consideration of economic feasibility, ease of use, and toxicity. These included sodium metabisulfite (SM), sodium thiosulfate (ST), and sodium sulfite (SS). We investigated the effect of organic matters in water on residual chlorine decomposition and compared the appropriate injection amounts for each dechlorination chemicals. Also, the effect of the pH of treated water upon dechlorination was assessed.Results and Discussion : Upon injection of dechlorination chemicals at the theoretical chlorine removal point, the chlorine was not completely removed but 10% to 40% remained. In ultrapure water, it was possible to completely dechlorinate by injecting 1.6 to 2.6 times more than the theoretical injection amount: 1.8, 2.2, and 3.1 times more for ST, SM, and SS, respectively. Considering only the injection amount, ST is an efficient dechlorination chemical for water with pH 9 or higher, and SM is for pH 9 or lessConclusion : Considering the product price and user convenience, it is feasible to use ST, which can resolve the odor problem.","PeriodicalId":52756,"journal":{"name":"daehanhwangyeonggonghaghoeji","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"daehanhwangyeonggonghaghoeji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4491/ksee.2022.44.4.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives : The objective of this study was to find a promising dechlorination chemical which can replace sodium bisulfite (SBS), which is mainly used as a dechlorination agent in reverse osmosis processes but can cause odor issues.Methods : Candidate chemicals were selected in consideration of economic feasibility, ease of use, and toxicity. These included sodium metabisulfite (SM), sodium thiosulfate (ST), and sodium sulfite (SS). We investigated the effect of organic matters in water on residual chlorine decomposition and compared the appropriate injection amounts for each dechlorination chemicals. Also, the effect of the pH of treated water upon dechlorination was assessed.Results and Discussion : Upon injection of dechlorination chemicals at the theoretical chlorine removal point, the chlorine was not completely removed but 10% to 40% remained. In ultrapure water, it was possible to completely dechlorinate by injecting 1.6 to 2.6 times more than the theoretical injection amount: 1.8, 2.2, and 3.1 times more for ST, SM, and SS, respectively. Considering only the injection amount, ST is an efficient dechlorination chemical for water with pH 9 or higher, and SM is for pH 9 or lessConclusion : Considering the product price and user convenience, it is feasible to use ST, which can resolve the odor problem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反渗透过程中商用脱氯化学品的比较
目的:本研究的目的是寻找一种有前途的脱氯化学品,可以取代亚硫酸氢钠(SBS),后者主要用作反渗透过程中的脱氯剂,但会引起气味问题。方法:从经济可行性、易用性、毒性等方面进行筛选。其中包括焦亚硫酸钠(SM)、硫代硫酸钠(ST)和亚硫酸钠(SS)。我们考察了水中有机物对余氯分解的影响,并比较了各种脱氯药剂的合适投加量。此外,还评价了处理水的pH值对脱氯的影响。结果与讨论:在理论除氯点注射脱氯药剂后,氯没有完全去除,但仍有10% ~ 40%残留。在超纯水中,注入比理论注入量多1.6 ~ 2.6倍即可完全脱氯,ST为1.8倍,SM为2.2倍,SS为3.1倍。仅从注射量来看,ST对于pH为9及以上的水是有效的脱氯剂,SM对于pH为9及以下的水是有效的脱氯剂。结论:考虑到产品价格和使用的便利性,使用ST是可行的,可以解决异味问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Domestic Wastewater Treatment Processes by Modeling: Existing Estimation Methods vs Modeling A Study on Assessment of Carbon Absorption Footprint (CAF) and Forestation in Local Governments Greenhouse Gas Emissions of an Urban Water System in Korea: A case study of Paju city Evaluation of the Chemical Characteristics and Predictive Model of Water-Soluble Inorganic Ions for Fine Particulate Matter Generated in Pohang Characteristics of Soil Heavy Metal Contamination in the Intensive Livestock Farming Watersheds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1