Civil Sanctuary: Clearly Marked Spaces of Civility in Divided Urban Settings

IF 2.3 2区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding Pub Date : 2022-06-08 DOI:10.1080/17502977.2022.2079341
Eric Lepp
{"title":"Civil Sanctuary: Clearly Marked Spaces of Civility in Divided Urban Settings","authors":"Eric Lepp","doi":"10.1080/17502977.2022.2079341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n Movement through spaces defined by segregation and mixing is a distinguishing feature of divided urban settings. Contributing to themes of the everyday and spatial understandings in peace research, this paper introduces civil sanctuaries. In divided urban settings these spaces of sanctuary are framed by civility, where people encounter one another across division while seemingly compartmentalising outward signs of disrespect. Through a case study of the Belfast Giants and SSE Arena, this article highlights clearly marked territory which differentiates itself from divisive norms and rhetoric, filtering who is welcome, and the notion of giving pause to routinised practices in divided settings.","PeriodicalId":46629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2022.2079341","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Movement through spaces defined by segregation and mixing is a distinguishing feature of divided urban settings. Contributing to themes of the everyday and spatial understandings in peace research, this paper introduces civil sanctuaries. In divided urban settings these spaces of sanctuary are framed by civility, where people encounter one another across division while seemingly compartmentalising outward signs of disrespect. Through a case study of the Belfast Giants and SSE Arena, this article highlights clearly marked territory which differentiates itself from divisive norms and rhetoric, filtering who is welcome, and the notion of giving pause to routinised practices in divided settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公民避难所:在分裂的城市环境中清晰可见的文明空间
在由隔离和混合定义的空间中移动是划分的城市环境的一个显著特征。本文介绍了民间避难所,以促进和平研究中的日常和空间理解。在分裂的城市环境中,这些避难所的空间是由文明构成的,在这里,人们跨越分歧彼此相遇,同时似乎将不尊重的外在迹象划分开来。通过对贝尔法斯特巨人队(Belfast Giants)和苏格兰和南方能源公司竞技场(SSE Arena)的案例研究,本文强调了明显的领域,它与分裂的规范和言论、过滤谁是受欢迎的,以及在分裂的环境中暂停常规做法的概念不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding is a cross-disciplinary journal devoted to critical analysis of international intervention, focussing on interactions and practices that shape, influence and transform states and societies. In 21st century political practice, states and other actors increasingly strive to transplant what they see as normatively progressive political orders to other contexts. Accordingly, JISB focuses on the complex interconnections and mutually shaping interactions between donor and recipient communities within military, economic, social, or other interventional contexts, and welcomes perspectives on political life of, and beyond, European state-building processes. The journal brings together academics and practitioners from cross-disciplinary backgrounds, including international relations, political science, political economy, sociology, international law, social anthropology, geography, and regional studies. The editors are particularly interested in specific or comparative in-depth analyses of contemporary or historical interventions and state-building processes that are grounded in careful fieldwork and/or innovative methodologies. Multi or cross-disciplinary contributions and theoretically challenging pieces that broaden the study of intervention and state building to encompass processes of decision-making, or the complex interplay between actors on the ground, are especially encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Correlates of Peace: Religious Determinants of Interreligious Peace Invoking ‘the Customary’ in the Formalization of Land Reform in Liberia and Sierra Leone Inclusivity in Practice: Patchworks of Inclusion at Multiple Tracks in the Colombian Peace Process Women, Peace and Security in EU Interventions: Analysing EULEX and Operation Irini Local Turn in Knowledge Production About Post-Conflict Societies: The Case of the Balkan Peace Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1