The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Inhibitory Control and interference Control in Athletes and Non-athletes

Q4 Psychology Polish Psychological Bulletin Pub Date : 2023-07-19 DOI:10.24425/ppb.2022.141866
Asieh Shabahang, R. Abedanzadeh, H. Ramezanzadeh
{"title":"The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Inhibitory Control and interference Control in Athletes and Non-athletes","authors":"Asieh Shabahang, R. Abedanzadeh, H. Ramezanzadeh","doi":"10.24425/ppb.2022.141866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": According to the literature, the importance of executive functions in everyday life, in the acquisition of motor skills, and in distinguishing cognitive performance of athletes and non-athletes is indisputable. Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) on inhibitory and interference control in athletes and non-athletes. Methods: Athletes and non-athletes were conveniently selected (N=48, age range: 18-30 years). Then, each group (athletes/non-athletes) was randomly divided into two groups: real and Sham stimulation. Real stimulation group was involved in sessions of stimulation with an intensity of 2 mA electric current applied for 20 minutes in three sessions. But Sham group was received stimulation only at the first 30 second in each session. The inhibition score in “Go/No Go” task and average response time in the Stroop's task were evaluated before and after three sessions of stimulation for real and Sham groups. Results: The results on inhibitory control variable showed that the difference between the two groups (real and Sham groups) was significant in the post-test ( p ≤ .05). The results on interference control variable showed that real stimulation compared to other group had a better performance. Conclusion: The present findings showed that tDCS improves performance in inhibitory and interference control tasks in athletes compared with non-athletes.","PeriodicalId":38657,"journal":{"name":"Polish Psychological Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Psychological Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/ppb.2022.141866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: According to the literature, the importance of executive functions in everyday life, in the acquisition of motor skills, and in distinguishing cognitive performance of athletes and non-athletes is indisputable. Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) on inhibitory and interference control in athletes and non-athletes. Methods: Athletes and non-athletes were conveniently selected (N=48, age range: 18-30 years). Then, each group (athletes/non-athletes) was randomly divided into two groups: real and Sham stimulation. Real stimulation group was involved in sessions of stimulation with an intensity of 2 mA electric current applied for 20 minutes in three sessions. But Sham group was received stimulation only at the first 30 second in each session. The inhibition score in “Go/No Go” task and average response time in the Stroop's task were evaluated before and after three sessions of stimulation for real and Sham groups. Results: The results on inhibitory control variable showed that the difference between the two groups (real and Sham groups) was significant in the post-test ( p ≤ .05). The results on interference control variable showed that real stimulation compared to other group had a better performance. Conclusion: The present findings showed that tDCS improves performance in inhibitory and interference control tasks in athletes compared with non-athletes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经颅直流电刺激对运动员和非运动员抑制控制和干扰控制的影响
根据文献,执行功能在日常生活、运动技能的获得以及区分运动员和非运动员的认知表现方面的重要性是无可争辩的。目的:探讨经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对运动员和非运动员的抑制和干扰控制的影响。方法:随机选择运动员和非运动员48例,年龄18 ~ 30岁。然后,每组(运动员/非运动员)随机分为两组:真实和虚假刺激。真实刺激组进行2毫安电流刺激,每次20分钟,分3次进行。而Sham组每次只在前30秒接受刺激。对真实组和假组在三次刺激前后的“去/不去”任务抑制得分和Stroop任务平均反应时间进行评价。结果:抑制控制变量结果显示,两组(real组和Sham组)后验差异有统计学意义(p≤0.05)。干扰控制变量的结果显示,真实刺激组比其他组有更好的表现。结论:与非运动员相比,tDCS可提高运动员在抑制和干扰控制任务中的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Polish Psychological Bulletin
Polish Psychological Bulletin Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disrupt Pique Technique: When Disrupting First Increases the Effectiveness of the Pique Technique How is objectification related to a devaluation of people in the workplace? Effective emotion regulation as a protective factor of depression symptoms in Slovak adolescents during a COVID-19 pandemic Is the ambiguity of emotion multidimensional? The ambiguous valence, activation and origin of emotions Linking Work Events with Work Engagement: Mediating Role of Emotions and Moderating Role of Psychological Capital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1