Contradictions and Crisis in the World of Work: Informality, Precarity and the Pandemic

IF 3 2区 社会学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Development and Change Pub Date : 2022-09-25 DOI:10.1111/dech.12733
Surbhi Kesar, Snehashish Bhattacharya, Lopamudra Banerjee
{"title":"Contradictions and Crisis in the World of Work: Informality, Precarity and the Pandemic","authors":"Surbhi Kesar,&nbsp;Snehashish Bhattacharya,&nbsp;Lopamudra Banerjee","doi":"10.1111/dech.12733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The severe economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global working population can be interpreted as both a fallout from, and a violent assertion of, a larger crisis in the world of work. While this crisis has been attributed to the pre-existing conditions of widespread informality and precarity in the domain of remunerative work, the authors of this article dig deeper to read these conditions and the crisis tendencies as articulations of certain key contradictions that define the world of work in the present conjuncture of global capitalism. The article highlights three specific contradictions: that between capital and labour in the ‘interior’ space of capital; that between capital and its ‘outside’; and those emerging from ‘dispersion’ of the circuit of capital to its ‘outside’. The ‘outside’ is the economic space that exists within the capitalist social formation but represents the domain of unwaged work carried out in the processes of non-capitalist production and distribution, both within and outside the space of the household. The authors argue that the expanded reproduction of capital has sharpened this triad of contradictions in the present conjuncture in specific ways in the global South and the global North through continuous informalization of work, exclusion of masses of population from the ‘interior’ domain of capital, and insistent dispersion of the circuit of capital to its ‘outside’ through various forms of ‘non-standard’ labour processes and work arrangements. The article provides some illustrations of how these processes have registered and contributed to the crisis situation in the times of the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":48194,"journal":{"name":"Development and Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dech.12733","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and Change","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dech.12733","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The severe economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global working population can be interpreted as both a fallout from, and a violent assertion of, a larger crisis in the world of work. While this crisis has been attributed to the pre-existing conditions of widespread informality and precarity in the domain of remunerative work, the authors of this article dig deeper to read these conditions and the crisis tendencies as articulations of certain key contradictions that define the world of work in the present conjuncture of global capitalism. The article highlights three specific contradictions: that between capital and labour in the ‘interior’ space of capital; that between capital and its ‘outside’; and those emerging from ‘dispersion’ of the circuit of capital to its ‘outside’. The ‘outside’ is the economic space that exists within the capitalist social formation but represents the domain of unwaged work carried out in the processes of non-capitalist production and distribution, both within and outside the space of the household. The authors argue that the expanded reproduction of capital has sharpened this triad of contradictions in the present conjuncture in specific ways in the global South and the global North through continuous informalization of work, exclusion of masses of population from the ‘interior’ domain of capital, and insistent dispersion of the circuit of capital to its ‘outside’ through various forms of ‘non-standard’ labour processes and work arrangements. The article provides some illustrations of how these processes have registered and contributed to the crisis situation in the times of the pandemic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
劳动世界的矛盾和危机:非正式性、不稳定性和流行病
2019冠状病毒病大流行对全球劳动人口的严重经济影响,既可以理解为劳动世界更大危机的后果,也可以理解为这一危机的暴力断言。虽然这场危机被归因于有偿工作领域广泛的非正式性和不稳定性的预先存在的条件,但本文的作者更深入地挖掘这些条件和危机趋势,将其作为在当前全球资本主义危机中定义工作世界的某些关键矛盾的表达。文章强调了三个具体的矛盾:资本“内部”空间中的资本与劳动之间的矛盾;资本与其“外部”之间的关系;以及那些从资本“分散”到资本“外部”的流动中产生的。“外部”是存在于资本主义社会形态内的经济空间,但代表了在非资本主义生产和分配过程中进行的无薪工作领域,包括家庭空间内外。作者认为,资本再生产的扩大在全球南方和全球北方以特定的方式加剧了当前形势下的这三种矛盾,通过持续的工作非正式化,将大量人口排除在资本的“内部”领域之外,以及通过各种形式的“非标准”劳动过程和工作安排,资本循环不断地分散到“外部”。这篇文章提供了一些例子,说明这些进程如何在大流行时期记录并助长了危机局势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Development and Change
Development and Change DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Development and Change is essential reading for anyone interested in development studies and social change. It publishes articles from a wide range of authors, both well-established specialists and young scholars, and is an important resource for: - social science faculties and research institutions - international development agencies and NGOs - graduate teachers and researchers - all those with a serious interest in the dynamics of development, from reflective activists to analytical practitioners
期刊最新文献
The Legacy of Maria Mies to the Feminist Movement and the Struggle for Human Liberation On the Economics of Cross‐border Reparations Payments: The Case for a Bank of International Reparations Global North–South Reparations: Demand‐side and Supply‐side Policies with a Dynamic View of International Trade and Finance Issue Information Colonialism, Genocide and Reparations: The German‐Namibian Case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1