Knowledge, attitude, and practices about biomedical waste management as per 2016 rules among resident doctors and nursing staff in a tertiary care specialty hospital: A cross-sectional study

Pranjal Dey, B. Das
{"title":"Knowledge, attitude, and practices about biomedical waste management as per 2016 rules among resident doctors and nursing staff in a tertiary care specialty hospital: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Pranjal Dey, B. Das","doi":"10.4103/jms.jms_73_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: During the health-care delivery process, healthcare establishments generate hazardous bio-medical wastes (BMWs) which need for appropriate handling and management to prevent environmental and public health hazard. Different healthcare professionals should have adequate knowledge, attitudes, and practices with respect to BMW management. Honorable Supreme Court of India had led down the guidelines on BMW (Management and Handling) Rules in 1998, which was amended in 2016 by the Environment ministry. Objective: To assess knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding BMW management among the resident doctors and nursing staff in a tertiary care specialty teaching hospital as per new BMW Management Rules, 2016. Study Design: This was an institution based cross-sectional study. Methods: Predesigned, pretested, structured questionnaires were administered on fifty resident doctors and fifty nursing staff of the hospital with their prior consent. Data were analyzed using SPSS-25. Chi-square test and independent-sample t-test were applied for the analysis. Results: Both groups had adequate and comparable knowledge about BMW management. The nursing group had significantly more favorable attitude and adequate practice in comparison to resident doctors (P = 0.0001). There was lack of adequate training in both the groups significantly more in resident doctors. Regarding practices, resident doctors had more inadequate practice regarding handling, segregation, disposal, reporting, and record maintenance of BMW than nursing staff. Conclusion: Nursing staff have a better attitude and good practice than the resident doctors about BMW management. There should be a regular training program regarding BMW management for both the cadres of health-care workers.","PeriodicalId":39636,"journal":{"name":"JMS - Journal of Medical Society","volume":"34 1","pages":"31 - 35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMS - Journal of Medical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jms.jms_73_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: During the health-care delivery process, healthcare establishments generate hazardous bio-medical wastes (BMWs) which need for appropriate handling and management to prevent environmental and public health hazard. Different healthcare professionals should have adequate knowledge, attitudes, and practices with respect to BMW management. Honorable Supreme Court of India had led down the guidelines on BMW (Management and Handling) Rules in 1998, which was amended in 2016 by the Environment ministry. Objective: To assess knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding BMW management among the resident doctors and nursing staff in a tertiary care specialty teaching hospital as per new BMW Management Rules, 2016. Study Design: This was an institution based cross-sectional study. Methods: Predesigned, pretested, structured questionnaires were administered on fifty resident doctors and fifty nursing staff of the hospital with their prior consent. Data were analyzed using SPSS-25. Chi-square test and independent-sample t-test were applied for the analysis. Results: Both groups had adequate and comparable knowledge about BMW management. The nursing group had significantly more favorable attitude and adequate practice in comparison to resident doctors (P = 0.0001). There was lack of adequate training in both the groups significantly more in resident doctors. Regarding practices, resident doctors had more inadequate practice regarding handling, segregation, disposal, reporting, and record maintenance of BMW than nursing staff. Conclusion: Nursing staff have a better attitude and good practice than the resident doctors about BMW management. There should be a regular training program regarding BMW management for both the cadres of health-care workers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三级护理专科医院住院医生和护理人员根据2016年规则对生物医学废物管理的知识、态度和实践:一项横断面研究
背景:在医疗保健提供过程中,医疗保健机构会产生危险的生物医疗废物,需要进行适当的处理和管理,以防止对环境和公共健康造成危害。不同的医疗保健专业人员应该对宝马管理有足够的知识、态度和实践。尊敬的印度最高法院于1998年制定了《宝马(管理和处理)规则》指南,该指南于2016年由环境部修订。目的:根据2016年新的《宝马管理规则》,评估三级护理专业教学医院住院医生和护理人员对宝马管理的知识、态度和实践。研究设计:这是一项基于机构的横断面研究。方法:在征得住院医师和护理人员同意的情况下,对50名住院医师和50名护理人员进行预先设计、预先测试和结构化问卷调查。使用SPSS-25对数据进行分析。采用卡方检验和独立样本t检验进行分析。结果:两组在宝马管理方面都有足够且可比的知识。与住院医生相比,护理组的态度和实践明显更为积极(P=0.0001)。两组都缺乏足够的培训,住院医生的情况更为严重。在实践方面,住院医生在宝马车的处理、隔离、处置、报告和记录维护方面的实践比护理人员更为不足。结论:护理人员对宝马车管理的态度和实践均优于住院医生。应该为医护人员的干部制定一个关于宝马管理的定期培训计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMS - Journal of Medical Society
JMS - Journal of Medical Society Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dyserythropoiesis: A morphology-based study on bone marrow specimens The management of fatal hyperhemolysis in a sickle cell anemia patient transfused in a remote Island in North Andaman Usefulness of exercise stress test in early diagnosis of coronary artery disease in diabetic patients An investigation into the use of an extended lipid panel in the screening of cardiovascular events Estimation of systemic and mucosal toll-like receptors 4 and 6 in women with breast tumor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1