How sajiao (playing cute) wins forgiveness: The effectiveness of emojis in rebuilding trust through apology

IF 2.1 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Discourse & Communication Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI:10.1177/17504813221123850
Kun-Hsin Yang
{"title":"How sajiao (playing cute) wins forgiveness: The effectiveness of emojis in rebuilding trust through apology","authors":"Kun-Hsin Yang","doi":"10.1177/17504813221123850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior studies have found that emojis can contribute to rebuilding customers’ trust when after-sale staff apologize to them, but studies on the different types of emojis and their different levels of effectiveness in rebuilding trust are still needed. In this paper, we explore the different types and frequencies of emojis and their effectiveness in rebuilding trust based on commercial discourses. Our data are collected from conversations between after-sale staff and customers during Ali Trademanager after-sale service. We find three types of emojis frequently used when after-sale staff apologizing to customers: face-related emojis, gesture-related emojis, and object-related emojis. Moreover, face-related emojis are the most frequently used, as their nature is to express emotion and attitude. The most effective emojis are the whimper emoji and kiss emoji, which are used by after-sale staff for sajiao (literally, ‘playing cute’). On the other hand, we show that the least effective emojis are the sorry emoji and happy emoji, which are deemed insincere because they violate the quality maxim and quantity maxim in the Cooperative Principle. This paper thus contributes to understanding the nature and function of emojis in commercial communication.","PeriodicalId":46726,"journal":{"name":"Discourse & Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse & Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813221123850","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Prior studies have found that emojis can contribute to rebuilding customers’ trust when after-sale staff apologize to them, but studies on the different types of emojis and their different levels of effectiveness in rebuilding trust are still needed. In this paper, we explore the different types and frequencies of emojis and their effectiveness in rebuilding trust based on commercial discourses. Our data are collected from conversations between after-sale staff and customers during Ali Trademanager after-sale service. We find three types of emojis frequently used when after-sale staff apologizing to customers: face-related emojis, gesture-related emojis, and object-related emojis. Moreover, face-related emojis are the most frequently used, as their nature is to express emotion and attitude. The most effective emojis are the whimper emoji and kiss emoji, which are used by after-sale staff for sajiao (literally, ‘playing cute’). On the other hand, we show that the least effective emojis are the sorry emoji and happy emoji, which are deemed insincere because they violate the quality maxim and quantity maxim in the Cooperative Principle. This paper thus contributes to understanding the nature and function of emojis in commercial communication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“撒娇”如何赢得原谅:表情符号在道歉中重建信任的有效性
先前的研究发现,当售后人员向客户道歉时,表情符号有助于重建客户的信任,但仍需研究不同类型的表情符号及其在重建信任方面的不同有效性。在本文中,我们探讨了表情符号的不同类型和频率,以及它们在基于商业话语重建信任方面的有效性。我们的数据是从Ali Trademanager售后服务期间售后人员与客户的对话中收集的。我们发现售后人员在向客户道歉时经常使用三种表情符号:面部表情符号、手势表情符号和物体表情符号。此外,与面部相关的表情符号是最常用的,因为它们的本质是表达情感和态度。最有效的表情符号是哭哭啼啼的表情符号和亲吻表情符号,这两种表情符号被售后人员用来表示sajiao(字面意思是“耍可爱”)。另一方面,我们发现效果最差的表情符号是抱歉的表情符号和高兴的表情符号,它们被认为是不真诚的,因为它们违反了合作原则中的质量准则和数量准则。因此,本文有助于理解表情符号在商业传播中的性质和功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Discourse & Communication
Discourse & Communication COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Discourse & Communication is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles that pay specific attention to the qualitative, discourse analytical approach to issues in communication research. Besides the classical social scientific methods in communication research, such as content analysis and frame analysis, a more explicit study of the structures of discourse (text, talk, images or multimedia messages) allows unprecedented empirical insights into the many phenomena of communication. Since contemporary discourse study is not limited to the account of "texts" or "conversation" alone, but has extended its field to the study of the cognitive, interactional, social, cultural.
期刊最新文献
Interactive probes: Towards action-level evaluation for dialogue systems Book review: Hiroki Nomoto and Elin McCready, Discourse Particles in Asian Languages Volume II ‘Have you insured yourself in any way?’ Salespersons’ mapping questions and their follow-ups in insurance sales negotiations Book review: Zsófia Demjén, Sarah Atkins and Elena Semino, Researching Language and Health: A Student Guide Book review: Claudio Scarvaglieri, Eva-Maria Graf, and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy (eds), Relationships in Organized Helping: Analyzing Interaction in Psychotherapy, Medical Encounters, Coaching and in Social Media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1