Exploring modern machine learning methods to improve causal-effect estimation

IF 0.5 Q4 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods Pub Date : 2022-03-31 DOI:10.29220/csam.2022.29.2.177
Yeji Kim, Tae-Kil Choi, Sangbum Choi
{"title":"Exploring modern machine learning methods to improve causal-effect estimation","authors":"Yeji Kim, Tae-Kil Choi, Sangbum Choi","doi":"10.29220/csam.2022.29.2.177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses the use of machine learning methods for causal estimation of treatment effects from observational data. Even though conducting randomized experimental trials is a gold standard to reveal potential causal relationships, observational study is another rich source for investigation of exposure effects, for example, in the research of comparative effectiveness and safety of treatments, where the causal effect can be identified if covariates contain all confounding variables. In this context, statistical regression models for the expected outcome and the probability of treatment are often imposed, which can be combined in a clever way to yield more efficient and robust causal estimators. Recently, targeted maximum likelihood estimation and causal random forest is proposed and extensively studied for the use of data-adaptive regression in estimation of causal inference parameters. Machine learning methods are a natural choice in these settings to improve the quality of the final estimate of the treatment effect. We explore how we can adapt the design and training of several machine learning algorithms for causal inference and study their finite-sample performance through simulation experiments under various scenarios. Application to the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) data shows that these adaptations can improve simple linear regression-based methods.","PeriodicalId":44931,"journal":{"name":"Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29220/csam.2022.29.2.177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper addresses the use of machine learning methods for causal estimation of treatment effects from observational data. Even though conducting randomized experimental trials is a gold standard to reveal potential causal relationships, observational study is another rich source for investigation of exposure effects, for example, in the research of comparative effectiveness and safety of treatments, where the causal effect can be identified if covariates contain all confounding variables. In this context, statistical regression models for the expected outcome and the probability of treatment are often imposed, which can be combined in a clever way to yield more efficient and robust causal estimators. Recently, targeted maximum likelihood estimation and causal random forest is proposed and extensively studied for the use of data-adaptive regression in estimation of causal inference parameters. Machine learning methods are a natural choice in these settings to improve the quality of the final estimate of the treatment effect. We explore how we can adapt the design and training of several machine learning algorithms for causal inference and study their finite-sample performance through simulation experiments under various scenarios. Application to the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) data shows that these adaptations can improve simple linear regression-based methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索现代机器学习方法以改进因果效应估计
本文讨论了使用机器学习方法从观察数据中对治疗效果进行因果估计。尽管进行随机实验试验是揭示潜在因果关系的金标准,但观察性研究是调查暴露效应的另一个丰富来源,例如,在治疗的比较有效性和安全性研究中,如果协变量包含所有混杂变量,则可以确定因果效应。在这种情况下,通常采用预期结果和治疗概率的统计回归模型,它们可以以一种巧妙的方式结合起来,产生更有效和稳健的因果估计。近年来,针对数据自适应回归在因果推理参数估计中的应用,提出了目标极大似然估计和因果随机森林方法,并进行了广泛的研究。在这些设置中,机器学习方法是提高最终治疗效果估计质量的自然选择。我们探索如何将几种机器学习算法的设计和训练适应于因果推理,并通过各种场景下的模拟实验研究它们的有限样本性能。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)数据的应用表明,这些适应性可以改进基于简单线性回归的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods (Commun. Stat. Appl. Methods, CSAM) is an official journal of the Korean Statistical Society and Korean International Statistical Society. It is an international and Open Access journal dedicated to publishing peer-reviewed, high quality and innovative statistical research. CSAM publishes articles on applied and methodological research in the areas of statistics and probability. It features rapid publication and broad coverage of statistical applications and methods. It welcomes papers on novel applications of statistical methodology in the areas including medicine (pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device), business, management, economics, ecology, education, computing, engineering, operational research, biology, sociology and earth science, but papers from other areas are also considered.
期刊最新文献
Influence diagnostics for skew-t censored linear regression models Identification of indirect effects in the two-condition within-subject mediation model and its implementation using SEM Robust extreme quantile estimation for Pareto-type tails through an exponential regression model Two-stage imputation method to handle missing data for categorical response variable Counterfactual image generation by disentangling data attributes with deep generative models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1