Risk of bias assessment tool for systematic review and meta-analysis of the gut microbiome

Thomas Lampeter, Charles Love, T. T. Tang, Aditi Marella, H. Y. Lee, Armani K Oganyan, Devin Moffat, Anisha Kareem, Matthew Rusling, Aubrey Massmann, Melanie Orr, C. Bongiorno, Lilian Yuan
{"title":"Risk of bias assessment tool for systematic review and meta-analysis of the gut microbiome","authors":"Thomas Lampeter, Charles Love, T. T. Tang, Aditi Marella, H. Y. Lee, Armani K Oganyan, Devin Moffat, Anisha Kareem, Matthew Rusling, Aubrey Massmann, Melanie Orr, C. Bongiorno, Lilian Yuan","doi":"10.1017/gmb.2023.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Risk of bias assessment is a critical step of any meta-analysis or systematic review. Given the low sample count of many microbiome studies, especially observational or cohort studies involving human subjects, many microbiome studies have low power. This increases the importance of performing meta-analysis and systematic review for microbiome research in order to enhance the relevance and applicability of microbiome results. This work proposes a method based on the ROBINS-I tool to systematically consider sources of bias in microbiome research seeking to perform meta-analysis or systematic review for microbiome studies.","PeriodicalId":73187,"journal":{"name":"Gut microbiome (Cambridge, England)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gut microbiome (Cambridge, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmb.2023.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Risk of bias assessment is a critical step of any meta-analysis or systematic review. Given the low sample count of many microbiome studies, especially observational or cohort studies involving human subjects, many microbiome studies have low power. This increases the importance of performing meta-analysis and systematic review for microbiome research in order to enhance the relevance and applicability of microbiome results. This work proposes a method based on the ROBINS-I tool to systematically consider sources of bias in microbiome research seeking to perform meta-analysis or systematic review for microbiome studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于肠道微生物组系统综述和荟萃分析的偏倚风险评估工具
偏倚风险评估是任何荟萃分析或系统评价的关键步骤。鉴于许多微生物组研究的样本数很少,特别是涉及人类受试者的观察性或队列研究,许多微生物组研究的有效性很低。这增加了对微生物组研究进行荟萃分析和系统评价的重要性,以提高微生物组研究结果的相关性和适用性。本工作提出了一种基于ROBINS-I工具的方法,以系统地考虑微生物组研究中的偏倚来源,寻求对微生物组研究进行荟萃分析或系统评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hydrogen gas and the gut microbiota are potential biomarkers for the development of experimental colitis in mice GUT METABOLOMIC PROFILES IN PEDIATRIC ULCERATIVE COLITIS PATIENTS PRIOR TO AND AFTER RECEIVING FECAL MICROBIOTA TRANSPLANTS The butyrate-producing and spore-forming bacterial genus Coprococcus as a potential biomarker for neurological disorders Risk of bias assessment tool for systematic review and meta-analysis of the gut microbiome Multiomics characterisation of the zoo-housed gorilla gut microbiome reveals bacterial community compositions shifts, fungal cellulose-degrading, and archaeal methanogenic activity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1