Witnessing the Anthropocene

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 N/A HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY ANGELAKI-JOURNAL OF THE THEORETICAL HUMANITIES Pub Date : 2023-07-04 DOI:10.1080/0969725X.2023.2233792
M. Richardson, Magdalena Zolkos
{"title":"Witnessing the Anthropocene","authors":"M. Richardson, Magdalena Zolkos","doi":"10.1080/0969725X.2023.2233792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anthropocene” is the second in a twopart endeavour, following the 2022 special issue on “Witnessing After the Human” in Angelaki (vol. 27, no. 2), which together form an inquiry into what it means to witness “after the human.” The current issue draws on cultural theory of testimony and witnessing to examine the practices and questions drawn out by the goals and objectives of “witnessing the Anthropocene.” The task at hand is marked by a distinctive aporia as it appears at the same time urgent and impossible. The scale of the current planetary crises in the world means that any such aesthetic and social practices of testimony need to acknowledge and work with epistemological and political limits of human subjectivity, individual or collective. While the Anthropocene might by definition be the product of human action, its scale and complexity appear at odds with the capacity of individual human perception or response. At the same time, such testimonial practices also foreground the need for alternative forms of worldly encounters, which radically expose the systems of knowledge, power, and economy that produced the crisis in the first place. This further requires recognition of the unique temporal structures within which “witnessing the Anthropocene” is positioned: rather than give an account of events that were antecedent to its narrative(s), at hand is a crisis that unfolds simultaneously to the testimonial production or even is ahead of it. Witnessing that which is proximate, intimate, and immediate stands in for something much larger and more complex, while also drawing attention to the close imbrications between testimonial materiality and the","PeriodicalId":45929,"journal":{"name":"ANGELAKI-JOURNAL OF THE THEORETICAL HUMANITIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANGELAKI-JOURNAL OF THE THEORETICAL HUMANITIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2023.2233792","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anthropocene” is the second in a twopart endeavour, following the 2022 special issue on “Witnessing After the Human” in Angelaki (vol. 27, no. 2), which together form an inquiry into what it means to witness “after the human.” The current issue draws on cultural theory of testimony and witnessing to examine the practices and questions drawn out by the goals and objectives of “witnessing the Anthropocene.” The task at hand is marked by a distinctive aporia as it appears at the same time urgent and impossible. The scale of the current planetary crises in the world means that any such aesthetic and social practices of testimony need to acknowledge and work with epistemological and political limits of human subjectivity, individual or collective. While the Anthropocene might by definition be the product of human action, its scale and complexity appear at odds with the capacity of individual human perception or response. At the same time, such testimonial practices also foreground the need for alternative forms of worldly encounters, which radically expose the systems of knowledge, power, and economy that produced the crisis in the first place. This further requires recognition of the unique temporal structures within which “witnessing the Anthropocene” is positioned: rather than give an account of events that were antecedent to its narrative(s), at hand is a crisis that unfolds simultaneously to the testimonial production or even is ahead of it. Witnessing that which is proximate, intimate, and immediate stands in for something much larger and more complex, while also drawing attention to the close imbrications between testimonial materiality and the
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
见证人类世
《人类世》是继2022年《Angelaki》(第27卷第27期)《人类之后的见证》特刊之后的第二期。2),它们一起构成了对见证“人类之后”意味着什么的调查。当前的问题借鉴了见证和见证的文化理论来研究“见证人类世”的目标和目的所引出的实践和问题。手头的任务有一种独特的焦虑感,因为它既紧迫又不可能。当前全球危机的规模意味着,任何这样的审美和社会见证实践都需要承认并与人类主体性(个人或集体)的认识论和政治限制一起工作。虽然从定义上讲,人类世可能是人类活动的产物,但其规模和复杂性似乎与人类个体的感知或反应能力不一致。与此同时,这样的见证实践也突出了对世俗相遇的替代形式的需求,这些形式从根本上暴露了最初产生危机的知识、权力和经济体系。这进一步需要认识到“见证人类世”所处的独特的时间结构:与其对其叙事之前的事件进行描述,不如将一场危机与见证作品同时展开,甚至在它之前展开。见证那些接近的、亲密的、直接的东西代表着更大、更复杂的东西,同时也把人们的注意力吸引到见证的物质性和现实之间的紧密联系上
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ANGELAKI-JOURNAL OF THE THEORETICAL HUMANITIES
ANGELAKI-JOURNAL OF THE THEORETICAL HUMANITIES HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Angelaki: journal of the theoretical humanities was established in September 1993 to provide an international forum for vanguard work in the theoretical humanities. In itself a contentious category, "theoretical humanities" represents the productive nexus of work in the disciplinary fields of literary criticism and theory, philosophy, and cultural studies. The journal is dedicated to the refreshing of intellectual coordinates, and to the challenging and vivifying process of re-thinking. Angelaki: journal of the theoretical humanities encourages a critical engagement with theory in terms of disciplinary development and intellectual and political usefulness, the inquiry into and articulation of culture.
期刊最新文献
General Issue I 2023 “I Just Care so Much About the Koalas” Notes on the contributors Enjoyment With(Out) Exception Resisting Academic Neoliberalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1