Life Cycle Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste Management for Dhulikhel Municipality, Nepal

IF 1 Q4 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science Pub Date : 2021-12-20 DOI:10.1680/jenes.21.00045
Sambuddha Bajracharya, Awanish Adhikari, Prasesh Pote Shrestha, A. Ghimire
{"title":"Life Cycle Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste Management for Dhulikhel Municipality, Nepal","authors":"Sambuddha Bajracharya, Awanish Adhikari, Prasesh Pote Shrestha, A. Ghimire","doi":"10.1680/jenes.21.00045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Solid Waste Management (SWM) is becoming a major environmental and public health concern in emerging municipalities in Nepal. In this study, the life cycle assessment (LCA) approach is used to address the environmental impacts of potential waste treatment scenarios in Dhulikhel Municipality in Nepal. The assessment was based on four different scenarios, viz. Scenario 1- landfilling, Scenario 2 - composting combined with landfilling, Scenario 3 - recycling, composting and landfilling, and Scenario 4 - recycling, anaerobic digestion, and landfilling. The LCA methodology was developed, including the benefits and impact potentials of different unit process in each scenario, also taking consideration of emissions from energy use. The environmental impacts from the scenarios were compared in terms of Global Warming Potential (GWP), Acidification Potential (AP), and Eutrophication Potential (EP). Among the four scenarios, scenario 4 (i.e. with anaerobic digestion) showed the most environmental advantage. Scenarios without biological treatment facilities are the least preferred option as their impact is significantly greater than other options. Therefore, organic waste is recommended not to be disposed of in landfill sites even if the transportation activity increases, because the magnitude of methane avoidance increases with an increased amount of waste diversion to the biological treatment units.","PeriodicalId":15665,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jenes.21.00045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Solid Waste Management (SWM) is becoming a major environmental and public health concern in emerging municipalities in Nepal. In this study, the life cycle assessment (LCA) approach is used to address the environmental impacts of potential waste treatment scenarios in Dhulikhel Municipality in Nepal. The assessment was based on four different scenarios, viz. Scenario 1- landfilling, Scenario 2 - composting combined with landfilling, Scenario 3 - recycling, composting and landfilling, and Scenario 4 - recycling, anaerobic digestion, and landfilling. The LCA methodology was developed, including the benefits and impact potentials of different unit process in each scenario, also taking consideration of emissions from energy use. The environmental impacts from the scenarios were compared in terms of Global Warming Potential (GWP), Acidification Potential (AP), and Eutrophication Potential (EP). Among the four scenarios, scenario 4 (i.e. with anaerobic digestion) showed the most environmental advantage. Scenarios without biological treatment facilities are the least preferred option as their impact is significantly greater than other options. Therefore, organic waste is recommended not to be disposed of in landfill sites even if the transportation activity increases, because the magnitude of methane avoidance increases with an increased amount of waste diversion to the biological treatment units.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼泊尔杜利赫勒市城市固体废物管理生命周期评估
固体废物管理正在成为尼泊尔新兴城市的一个主要环境和公共卫生问题。在本研究中,生命周期评估(LCA)方法用于解决尼泊尔杜利赫勒市潜在废物处理方案的环境影响。评估是基于四个不同的方案,即方案1-堆填、方案2 -堆肥及堆填、方案3 -循环再造、堆肥及堆填,以及方案4 -循环再造、厌氧消化及堆填。制定了生命周期分析方法,包括在每种情况下不同单元过程的效益和潜在影响,同时也考虑到能源使用产生的排放。通过全球变暖潜势(GWP)、酸化潜势(AP)和富营养化潜势(EP)对不同情景的环境影响进行了比较。在4种方案中,方案4(即厌氧消化)表现出最大的环境优势。没有生物处理设施的方案是最不受欢迎的方案,因为其影响明显大于其他方案。因此,即使运输活动增加,也不建议将有机废物处置在垃圾填埋场,因为随着废物转移到生物处理单元的数量增加,避免甲烷的程度也会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science is an international, peer-reviewed publication providing a forum for the dissemination of environmental research, encouraging interdisciplinary research collaboration to address environmental problems. It addresses all aspects of environmental engineering and applied environmental science, with the exception of noise, radiation and light.
期刊最新文献
Lessons from the Danish production of green hydrogen using proton membrane electrolysis of clean drinking water A comprehensive lifecycle assessment of plastic mulching for maize Assessment of the Radioecological Situation Based on Spectral Analyzes of Radionuclides Preparation of thiol modified olive stone-based biochar for the removal of Hg (II)from aqueous solutions Surfactants: hygiene’s first line of defense against pollution, properties, applications, environmental impacts, and treatment methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1