Poor regeneration of pine after mountain pine beetle attack in colder boreal regions of Canada.

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY Canadian Journal of Forest Research Pub Date : 2023-08-09 DOI:10.1139/cjfr-2023-0113
V. Lieffers, Julie Benedik, K. Stadt, S. Macdonald
{"title":"Poor regeneration of pine after mountain pine beetle attack in colder boreal regions of Canada.","authors":"V. Lieffers, Julie Benedik, K. Stadt, S. Macdonald","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2023-0113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent expansion of mountain pine beetle (MPB, Dendroctonus ponderosae) from its native range in western North America into northern boreal pine forests in Alberta, Canada has resulted in conditions for tree regeneration that are dramatically different from those after wildfire, the predominant natural disturbance in these forests. We assessed natural regeneration post-MPB for northern boreal lodgepole pine sites in Alberta, Canada: via intensive surveys of small plots at 33 severely-attacked pine stands, and using data from 205 permanent sample plots representing various site types and levels of MPB-mortality. We used model selection to identify factors explaining regeneration. Overall, pine regeneration was very poor 6-9 years post-MPB; only 42% of the 33 intensively surveyed plots, and only 9% of the 205 permanent plots, had pine seedlings. This poor regeneration is attributed to high levels of cone serotiny in these populations, unsuitable regeneration microsites due to undisturbed litter or feathermoss layers, and competition from the residual canopy and understory vegetation. Other species (aspen, birch, poplar, black and white spruce) were found on most sites, either as post-attack regeneration or regeneration established in advance. Without intervention, many of these stands will likely transition away from pine, to broadleaf and other conifer species.","PeriodicalId":9483,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2023-0113","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recent expansion of mountain pine beetle (MPB, Dendroctonus ponderosae) from its native range in western North America into northern boreal pine forests in Alberta, Canada has resulted in conditions for tree regeneration that are dramatically different from those after wildfire, the predominant natural disturbance in these forests. We assessed natural regeneration post-MPB for northern boreal lodgepole pine sites in Alberta, Canada: via intensive surveys of small plots at 33 severely-attacked pine stands, and using data from 205 permanent sample plots representing various site types and levels of MPB-mortality. We used model selection to identify factors explaining regeneration. Overall, pine regeneration was very poor 6-9 years post-MPB; only 42% of the 33 intensively surveyed plots, and only 9% of the 205 permanent plots, had pine seedlings. This poor regeneration is attributed to high levels of cone serotiny in these populations, unsuitable regeneration microsites due to undisturbed litter or feathermoss layers, and competition from the residual canopy and understory vegetation. Other species (aspen, birch, poplar, black and white spruce) were found on most sites, either as post-attack regeneration or regeneration established in advance. Without intervention, many of these stands will likely transition away from pine, to broadleaf and other conifer species.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大北部寒冷地区山地松甲虫袭击后松树再生不良。
最近,山松甲虫(MPB, Dendroctonus ponderosae)从其北美西部的原生地扩展到加拿大阿尔伯塔省北部的北方松林,导致树木再生的条件与野火(这些森林中主要的自然干扰)后的条件截然不同。我们评估了加拿大艾伯塔省北部针叶松地在mpb后的自然再生:通过对33个严重受损松树林的小块地进行密集调查,并使用205个永久样地的数据,代表了不同的样地类型和mpb死亡率水平。我们使用模型选择来确定解释再生的因素。总体而言,mpb后6-9年,松木再生非常差;在集中调查的33个样地中,只有42%有松树苗,205个永久样地中只有9%有松树苗。这种较差的再生是由于这些种群中高水平的球果群落,由于未受干扰的凋落物或羽苔层而不适合再生的微点,以及来自剩余冠层和林下植被的竞争。其他树种(白杨、桦树、白杨、黑白云杉)在大多数地点被发现,要么是攻击后再生,要么是提前建立的再生。如果不进行干预,这些林分中的许多可能会从松树过渡到阔叶和其他针叶树物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
109
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1971, the Canadian Journal of Forest Research is a monthly journal that features articles, reviews, notes and concept papers on a broad spectrum of forest sciences, including biometrics, conservation, disturbances, ecology, economics, entomology, genetics, hydrology, management, nutrient cycling, pathology, physiology, remote sensing, silviculture, social sciences, soils, stand dynamics, and wood science, all in relation to the understanding or management of ecosystem services. It also publishes special issues dedicated to a topic of current interest.
期刊最新文献
Potential replacement understory woody plants for Robinia pseudoacacia plantations: Species composition and vertical distribution pattern Which factors influence consumers’ selection of wood as a building material for houses? Can partial-cut harvesting be used to extend the availability of terrestrial forage lichens in late-seral pine-lichen woodlands? Evidence from the Lewes Marsh (southern Yukon) silvicultural systems trial. Challenges and Opportunities Associated with Lifting the Zero COVID-19 Policy in China. Modelling diameter at breast height distribution of jack pine and black spruce natural stands in eastern Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1