Safety of Endoscopic-Ultrasound-Guided Portal Injection Chemotherapy using Drug-Eluting Microbeads in a Porcine Model

D. Faigel
{"title":"Safety of Endoscopic-Ultrasound-Guided Portal Injection Chemotherapy using Drug-Eluting Microbeads in a Porcine Model","authors":"D. Faigel","doi":"10.30683/1929-2279.2018.07.04.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Background and Aims : Patients with diffuse liver metastases have systemic chemotherapy as their only treatment option. We developed Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-guided portal injection chemotherapy (EPIC) to increase drug levels in hepatic tissue as a novel new liver directed therapy. Methods : Sixteen anesthetized pigs were treated with 50 mg of irinotecan (n=8) or doxorubicin (n=8). Half (n=4) of the animals in each drug group were treated with EPIC-injected microbeads or EUS-guided chemotherapy without beads into the inferior vena cava (control). Animals were observed twice daily for 7 days for signs of clinical toxicities. Tissue samples were harvested for histology and drug levels. Blood counts and chemistries were determined pre-treatment and at 7 days. Results : No toxicities as evidenced by abnormal animal behavior were observed. No significant changes occurred in blood chemistry or blood counts in the irinotecan groups. For doxorubicin, systemic injection significantly decreased albumin, hemoglobin, and white blood cell count ( P <.05), with no changes after EPIC. Hepatic histology showed mild foreign body reactions around the beads. No significant histologic changes were seen in other tissue sites. Neither irinotecan nor SN-38 was detectable at 7 days. For doxorubicin, no drug was detected in the plasma or bone marrow. The mean (SD) doxorubicin hepatic levels were non-significantly increased with vs control (181 [241] vs 151 [67] ng/g). Cardiac doxorubicin levels were significantly lower with EPIC (15 [4] vs 138 [48] ng/g; P =.02). Conclusions : EPIC using drug-eluting microbeads was safe in this animal model. For doxorubicin, EPIC may be safer than systemic injection.","PeriodicalId":89799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research updates","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research updates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30683/1929-2279.2018.07.04.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

: Background and Aims : Patients with diffuse liver metastases have systemic chemotherapy as their only treatment option. We developed Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-guided portal injection chemotherapy (EPIC) to increase drug levels in hepatic tissue as a novel new liver directed therapy. Methods : Sixteen anesthetized pigs were treated with 50 mg of irinotecan (n=8) or doxorubicin (n=8). Half (n=4) of the animals in each drug group were treated with EPIC-injected microbeads or EUS-guided chemotherapy without beads into the inferior vena cava (control). Animals were observed twice daily for 7 days for signs of clinical toxicities. Tissue samples were harvested for histology and drug levels. Blood counts and chemistries were determined pre-treatment and at 7 days. Results : No toxicities as evidenced by abnormal animal behavior were observed. No significant changes occurred in blood chemistry or blood counts in the irinotecan groups. For doxorubicin, systemic injection significantly decreased albumin, hemoglobin, and white blood cell count ( P <.05), with no changes after EPIC. Hepatic histology showed mild foreign body reactions around the beads. No significant histologic changes were seen in other tissue sites. Neither irinotecan nor SN-38 was detectable at 7 days. For doxorubicin, no drug was detected in the plasma or bone marrow. The mean (SD) doxorubicin hepatic levels were non-significantly increased with vs control (181 [241] vs 151 [67] ng/g). Cardiac doxorubicin levels were significantly lower with EPIC (15 [4] vs 138 [48] ng/g; P =.02). Conclusions : EPIC using drug-eluting microbeads was safe in this animal model. For doxorubicin, EPIC may be safer than systemic injection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在猪模型中使用药物洗脱微珠进行内镜超声引导的门静脉注射化疗的安全性
背景与目的:弥漫性肝转移患者的唯一治疗选择是全身化疗。我们开发了内镜超声(EUS)引导的门静脉注射化疗(EPIC),以增加肝组织中的药物水平,作为一种新的肝脏定向治疗。方法:16头麻醉猪分别给予伊立替康(n=8)或阿霉素(n=8) 50 mg。每个药物组各有一半(n=4)的动物接受epic注射微珠或eus引导下腔静脉无微珠化疗(对照组)。每天观察动物两次,连续7天观察临床毒性迹象。收集组织样本用于组织学和药物水平。治疗前和第7天测定血液计数和化学成分。结果:动物行为异常,未见毒副作用。伊立替康组的血液化学和血细胞计数没有发生显著变化。对于阿霉素,全身注射可显著降低白蛋白、血红蛋白和白细胞计数(P < 0.05), EPIC后无变化。肝脏组织学显示小球周围有轻微的异物反应。其他组织部位未见明显组织学改变。第7天,伊立替康和SN-38均未检出。对于阿霉素,血浆和骨髓中未检测到药物。与对照组相比,阿霉素肝脏平均(SD)水平无显著升高(181[241]对151 [67]ng/g)。EPIC组心脏阿霉素水平显著降低(15 [4]vs 138 [4] ng/g;P = .02点)。结论:药物洗脱微珠体外显像在动物模型中是安全的。对于阿霉素,EPIC可能比全身注射更安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New Insight of Oncology: Cancer Concept without Tumor Successful Treatment, with Chemotherapy and Intravenous Administration of Ascorbic Acid, of a Patient with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise Specified Successful Treatment, with Chemotherapy and Intravenous Administration of Ascorbic Acid, of a Patient with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise Specified Studying the Role of Novel Carbon Nano Tubes as a Therapeutic Agent to Treat Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) - an In Vitro and In Vivo Study. Marjolins Ulcer: Clinicopathological Profile and Treatment Patterns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1