The Central Role of Rosenbaum and Rubin’s Seminal Work

A. Spieker
{"title":"The Central Role of Rosenbaum and Rubin’s Seminal Work","authors":"A. Spieker","doi":"10.1353/obs.2023.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Rosenbaum and Rubin’s seminal work on the propensity score set the stage for decades of subsequent developments in causal inference methodology for use in observational studies. In this commentary, I discuss two specific aspects of their work with particular emphasis on how they have shaped my understanding of causal inference: (1) the propensity score as a data reduction technique, and (2) the importance of drawing parallels between the observational study and the randomized experiment.","PeriodicalId":74335,"journal":{"name":"Observational studies","volume":"9 1","pages":"105 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Observational studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2023.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Rosenbaum and Rubin’s seminal work on the propensity score set the stage for decades of subsequent developments in causal inference methodology for use in observational studies. In this commentary, I discuss two specific aspects of their work with particular emphasis on how they have shaped my understanding of causal inference: (1) the propensity score as a data reduction technique, and (2) the importance of drawing parallels between the observational study and the randomized experiment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗森鲍姆与鲁宾神学院著作的中心作用
摘要:Rosenbaum和Rubin在倾向得分方面的开创性工作为随后几十年用于观察性研究的因果推理方法的发展奠定了基础。在这篇评论中,我讨论了他们工作的两个具体方面,特别强调了他们是如何塑造我对因果推断的理解的:(1)倾向得分作为一种数据简化技术,以及(2)在观察性研究和随机实验之间进行比较的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A new four-arm within-study comparison: Design, implementation, and data. causalBETA: An R Package for Bayesian Semiparametric Causal Inference with Event-Time Outcomes. The interventionist approach can address questions related to causes of effects if causes are considered as states instead of interventions. Review of "A First Course in Causal Inference" by Peng Ding. An overview of methods for receiver operating characteristic analysis, with an application to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced humoral responses in solid organ transplant recipients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1