Practice Patterns for Addressing Developmental-Behavioral Concerns in Sickle Cell Specialty Care.

IF 1.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-10 DOI:10.1037/cpp0000461
Alyssa M Schlenz, Shannon Phillips, Martina Mueller, Julie Kanter
{"title":"Practice Patterns for Addressing Developmental-Behavioral Concerns in Sickle Cell Specialty Care.","authors":"Alyssa M Schlenz, Shannon Phillips, Martina Mueller, Julie Kanter","doi":"10.1037/cpp0000461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) are at elevated risk for neurodevelopmental and behavioral disorders. This report describes developmental-behavioral practice patterns among sites who were part of the Dissemination and Implementation of Stroke Prevention Looking at the Care Environment (DISPLACE) consortium in the context of current guidelines for addressing these concerns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An internal survey was developed for the Principal Investigators of the DISPLACE study to identify developmental-behavioral clinical practices across the 28-site consortium, including methods for identification, referral practices, access to psychologists, and barriers to services. Descriptive data were pulled from the survey to describe practice patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most sites used informal methods to detect developmental-behavioral concerns, though over 1/3 of sites were using a structured protocol. The most common referral indications for further developmental and neuropsychological evaluation were parent, provider, or school concerns or stroke. Evaluations were predominantly completed by pediatric neuropsychologists and pediatric psychologists. Despite most sites reporting access to a psychologist within the SCD clinic, sites also reported long waitlists and difficulty accessing providers for evaluation and treatment services. Insurance difficulties were also a common barrier. A range of additional barriers were reported at the patient, provider, organizational, and policy/socio-environmental levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many sites in the DISPLACE consortium were adhering to existing care guidelines for pediatric SCD; however, there was also wide variation in practices for which guidelines are absent or unclear. Additional work is needed to inform guidelines, to specify the role of psychology within specialty SCD care, and to overcome barriers to care.</p><p><strong>Implications for impact statement: </strong>Optimal developmental-behavioral care for children with SCD involves collaboration among specialty care providers and pediatric psychologists; however, these efforts may be hampered by dispersed or unclear guidelines and several barriers to care. Future studies and guidelines have the potential to improve care by providing clear, consistent, and unified care recommendations specific to psychologists and related care professionals who are supporting children with SCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":37641,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593419/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cpp0000461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) are at elevated risk for neurodevelopmental and behavioral disorders. This report describes developmental-behavioral practice patterns among sites who were part of the Dissemination and Implementation of Stroke Prevention Looking at the Care Environment (DISPLACE) consortium in the context of current guidelines for addressing these concerns.

Methods: An internal survey was developed for the Principal Investigators of the DISPLACE study to identify developmental-behavioral clinical practices across the 28-site consortium, including methods for identification, referral practices, access to psychologists, and barriers to services. Descriptive data were pulled from the survey to describe practice patterns.

Results: Most sites used informal methods to detect developmental-behavioral concerns, though over 1/3 of sites were using a structured protocol. The most common referral indications for further developmental and neuropsychological evaluation were parent, provider, or school concerns or stroke. Evaluations were predominantly completed by pediatric neuropsychologists and pediatric psychologists. Despite most sites reporting access to a psychologist within the SCD clinic, sites also reported long waitlists and difficulty accessing providers for evaluation and treatment services. Insurance difficulties were also a common barrier. A range of additional barriers were reported at the patient, provider, organizational, and policy/socio-environmental levels.

Conclusions: Many sites in the DISPLACE consortium were adhering to existing care guidelines for pediatric SCD; however, there was also wide variation in practices for which guidelines are absent or unclear. Additional work is needed to inform guidelines, to specify the role of psychology within specialty SCD care, and to overcome barriers to care.

Implications for impact statement: Optimal developmental-behavioral care for children with SCD involves collaboration among specialty care providers and pediatric psychologists; however, these efforts may be hampered by dispersed or unclear guidelines and several barriers to care. Future studies and guidelines have the potential to improve care by providing clear, consistent, and unified care recommendations specific to psychologists and related care professionals who are supporting children with SCD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
镰状细胞专科护理中解决发育行为问题的实践模式。
目的:患有镰状细胞病(SCD)的儿童患神经发育和行为障碍的风险较高。本报告描述了在当前解决这些问题的指导方针的背景下,参与中风预防传播和实施关注护理环境联盟(DISPLACE)的机构的发展行为实践模式。方法:为DISPLACE研究的主要研究人员制定了一项内部调查,以确定28个地点联盟的发展行为临床实践,包括识别方法、转诊实践、接触心理学家和服务障碍。从调查中提取描述性数据来描述实践模式。结果:大多数网站使用非正式的方法来检测发展行为问题,尽管超过1/3的网站使用结构化协议。进一步发展和神经心理评估最常见的转诊指征是父母、提供者或学校的担忧或中风。评估主要由儿童神经心理学家和儿童心理学家完成。尽管大多数网站都报告说可以在SCD诊所内找到心理学家,但网站也报告说,等待名单很长,很难找到评估和治疗服务的提供者。保险困难也是一个常见的障碍。据报道,在患者、提供者、组织和政策/社会环境层面存在一系列额外的障碍。结论:DISPLACE联盟中的许多机构都遵守现有的儿科SCD护理指南;然而,在没有指导方针或指导方针不明确的实践中也存在很大差异。需要做更多的工作来为指导方针提供信息,明确心理学在SCD专业护理中的作用,并克服护理障碍。影响声明的含义:SCD儿童的最佳发展行为护理涉及专业护理提供者和儿科心理学家之间的合作;然而,这些努力可能会因指导方针分散或不明确以及护理方面的一些障碍而受到阻碍。未来的研究和指南有可能通过为支持SCD儿童的心理学家和相关护理专业人员提供明确、一致和统一的护理建议来改善护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology
Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology® publishes articles representing the professional and applied activities of pediatric psychology. The journal comprehensively describes the breadth and richness of the field in its diverse activities;complements the scientific development of the field with information on the applied/clinical side;provides modeling that addresses the ways practicing pediatric psychologists incorporate empirical literature into day-to-day activities;emphasizes work that incorporates and cites evidence from the science base; andprovides a forum for those engaged in primarily clinical activities to report on their activities and inform future research activities. Articles include a range of formats such as commentaries, reviews, and clinical case reports in addition to more traditional empirical clinical studies. Articles address issues such as: professional and training activities in pediatric psychology and interprofessional functioning;funding/reimbursement patterns and the evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of clinical services;program development;organization of clinical services and workforce analyses;applications of evidence based interventions in "real world" settings with particular attention to potential barriers and solutions and considerations of diverse populations;critical analyses of professional practice issues;clinical innovations, e.g., emerging use of technology in clinical practice;case studies, particularly case studies that have enough detail to be replicated and that provide a basis for larger scale intervention studies; andorganizational, state and federal policies as they impact the practice of pediatric psychology, with a particular emphasis on changes due to health care reform.
期刊最新文献
Adherence in young people living with juvenile arthritis: A systematic review. Racial match: Black youth and pediatric integrated primary care. Acceptance and commitment therapy-based intervention for parents living with chronic pain: Feasibility and acceptability study. Participation in organized physical activity and discomfort with locker rooms among youth across sexual, gender, and racial identities. Ethical and psychological considerations for posthumous-assisted reproduction for adolescents and young adults with poor cancer prognosis in the context of grief.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1