Alyssa M Schlenz, Shannon Phillips, Martina Mueller, Julie Kanter
{"title":"Practice Patterns for Addressing Developmental-Behavioral Concerns in Sickle Cell Specialty Care.","authors":"Alyssa M Schlenz, Shannon Phillips, Martina Mueller, Julie Kanter","doi":"10.1037/cpp0000461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) are at elevated risk for neurodevelopmental and behavioral disorders. This report describes developmental-behavioral practice patterns among sites who were part of the Dissemination and Implementation of Stroke Prevention Looking at the Care Environment (DISPLACE) consortium in the context of current guidelines for addressing these concerns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An internal survey was developed for the Principal Investigators of the DISPLACE study to identify developmental-behavioral clinical practices across the 28-site consortium, including methods for identification, referral practices, access to psychologists, and barriers to services. Descriptive data were pulled from the survey to describe practice patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most sites used informal methods to detect developmental-behavioral concerns, though over 1/3 of sites were using a structured protocol. The most common referral indications for further developmental and neuropsychological evaluation were parent, provider, or school concerns or stroke. Evaluations were predominantly completed by pediatric neuropsychologists and pediatric psychologists. Despite most sites reporting access to a psychologist within the SCD clinic, sites also reported long waitlists and difficulty accessing providers for evaluation and treatment services. Insurance difficulties were also a common barrier. A range of additional barriers were reported at the patient, provider, organizational, and policy/socio-environmental levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many sites in the DISPLACE consortium were adhering to existing care guidelines for pediatric SCD; however, there was also wide variation in practices for which guidelines are absent or unclear. Additional work is needed to inform guidelines, to specify the role of psychology within specialty SCD care, and to overcome barriers to care.</p><p><strong>Implications for impact statement: </strong>Optimal developmental-behavioral care for children with SCD involves collaboration among specialty care providers and pediatric psychologists; however, these efforts may be hampered by dispersed or unclear guidelines and several barriers to care. Future studies and guidelines have the potential to improve care by providing clear, consistent, and unified care recommendations specific to psychologists and related care professionals who are supporting children with SCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":37641,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593419/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cpp0000461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) are at elevated risk for neurodevelopmental and behavioral disorders. This report describes developmental-behavioral practice patterns among sites who were part of the Dissemination and Implementation of Stroke Prevention Looking at the Care Environment (DISPLACE) consortium in the context of current guidelines for addressing these concerns.
Methods: An internal survey was developed for the Principal Investigators of the DISPLACE study to identify developmental-behavioral clinical practices across the 28-site consortium, including methods for identification, referral practices, access to psychologists, and barriers to services. Descriptive data were pulled from the survey to describe practice patterns.
Results: Most sites used informal methods to detect developmental-behavioral concerns, though over 1/3 of sites were using a structured protocol. The most common referral indications for further developmental and neuropsychological evaluation were parent, provider, or school concerns or stroke. Evaluations were predominantly completed by pediatric neuropsychologists and pediatric psychologists. Despite most sites reporting access to a psychologist within the SCD clinic, sites also reported long waitlists and difficulty accessing providers for evaluation and treatment services. Insurance difficulties were also a common barrier. A range of additional barriers were reported at the patient, provider, organizational, and policy/socio-environmental levels.
Conclusions: Many sites in the DISPLACE consortium were adhering to existing care guidelines for pediatric SCD; however, there was also wide variation in practices for which guidelines are absent or unclear. Additional work is needed to inform guidelines, to specify the role of psychology within specialty SCD care, and to overcome barriers to care.
Implications for impact statement: Optimal developmental-behavioral care for children with SCD involves collaboration among specialty care providers and pediatric psychologists; however, these efforts may be hampered by dispersed or unclear guidelines and several barriers to care. Future studies and guidelines have the potential to improve care by providing clear, consistent, and unified care recommendations specific to psychologists and related care professionals who are supporting children with SCD.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology® publishes articles representing the professional and applied activities of pediatric psychology. The journal comprehensively describes the breadth and richness of the field in its diverse activities;complements the scientific development of the field with information on the applied/clinical side;provides modeling that addresses the ways practicing pediatric psychologists incorporate empirical literature into day-to-day activities;emphasizes work that incorporates and cites evidence from the science base; andprovides a forum for those engaged in primarily clinical activities to report on their activities and inform future research activities. Articles include a range of formats such as commentaries, reviews, and clinical case reports in addition to more traditional empirical clinical studies. Articles address issues such as: professional and training activities in pediatric psychology and interprofessional functioning;funding/reimbursement patterns and the evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of clinical services;program development;organization of clinical services and workforce analyses;applications of evidence based interventions in "real world" settings with particular attention to potential barriers and solutions and considerations of diverse populations;critical analyses of professional practice issues;clinical innovations, e.g., emerging use of technology in clinical practice;case studies, particularly case studies that have enough detail to be replicated and that provide a basis for larger scale intervention studies; andorganizational, state and federal policies as they impact the practice of pediatric psychology, with a particular emphasis on changes due to health care reform.