Comparative analysis of estimated solar radiation with different learning methods and empirical models

IF 1 4区 地球科学 Q4 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Atmosfera Pub Date : 2022-08-02 DOI:10.20937/atm.53131
Mehmet Murat Comert, Kemal Adem, Müberra Erdoğan
{"title":"Comparative analysis of estimated solar radiation with different learning methods\n and empirical models","authors":"Mehmet Murat Comert, Kemal Adem, Müberra Erdoğan","doi":"10.20937/atm.53131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Solar radiation, which is used in hydrological modeling, agricultural, solar\n energy systems, and climatological studies, is the most important element of the energy\n reaching the earth. The present study compared, the performance of two empirical\n equations -Angstrom and Hargreaves-Samani equations- and, three machine learning models\n -Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Long Short-Term\n Memory (LSTM)-. Various learning models were developed for the variables used in each\n empirical equation. In the present study, monthly data of six stations in Turkey, three\n stations receiving the most solar radiation and three stations receiving the least solar\n radiation, were used. In terms of the mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error\n (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and determination coefficient () values of each\n model, LSTM was the most successful model, followed by ANN and SVM. The MAE value was\n 2.65 with the Hargreaves-Samani equation and, decreased to 0.987 with the LSTM model\n while MAE was 1.24 in the Angstrom equation and decreased to 0.747 with the LSTM model.\n The study revealed that the deep learning model is more appropriate to use compared to\n the empirical equations even in cases where there is limited data.","PeriodicalId":55576,"journal":{"name":"Atmosfera","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmosfera","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20937/atm.53131","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Solar radiation, which is used in hydrological modeling, agricultural, solar energy systems, and climatological studies, is the most important element of the energy reaching the earth. The present study compared, the performance of two empirical equations -Angstrom and Hargreaves-Samani equations- and, three machine learning models -Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)-. Various learning models were developed for the variables used in each empirical equation. In the present study, monthly data of six stations in Turkey, three stations receiving the most solar radiation and three stations receiving the least solar radiation, were used. In terms of the mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and determination coefficient () values of each model, LSTM was the most successful model, followed by ANN and SVM. The MAE value was 2.65 with the Hargreaves-Samani equation and, decreased to 0.987 with the LSTM model while MAE was 1.24 in the Angstrom equation and decreased to 0.747 with the LSTM model. The study revealed that the deep learning model is more appropriate to use compared to the empirical equations even in cases where there is limited data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同学习方法和经验模型估算太阳辐射的比较分析
太阳辐射是到达地球的能量中最重要的元素,它被用于水文模型、农业、太阳能系统和气候研究。本研究比较了两个经验方程- angstrom和Hargreaves-Samani方程-以及三种机器学习模型-人工神经网络(ANN),支持向量机(SVM)和长短期记忆(LSTM)-的性能。为每个经验方程中使用的变量开发了各种学习模型。在本研究中,使用了土耳其六个站点的月数据,其中三个站点接收太阳辐射最多,三个站点接收太阳辐射最少。从各模型的均方误差(MSE)、均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)和决定系数()值来看,LSTM是最成功的模型,其次是ANN和SVM。在Hargreaves-Samani方程下MAE为2.65,在LSTM模型下MAE降至0.987,在Angstrom方程下MAE为1.24,在LSTM模型下MAE降至0.747。研究表明,即使在数据有限的情况下,深度学习模型也比经验方程更适合使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Atmosfera
Atmosfera 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ATMÓSFERA seeks contributions on theoretical, basic, empirical and applied research in all the areas of atmospheric sciences, with emphasis on meteorology, climatology, aeronomy, physics, chemistry, and aerobiology. Interdisciplinary contributions are also accepted; especially those related with oceanography, hydrology, climate variability and change, ecology, forestry, glaciology, agriculture, environmental pollution, and other topics related to economy and society as they are affected by atmospheric hazards.
期刊最新文献
Subsurface temperature change attributed to climate change at the northern latitude site of Kapuskasing, Canada Development of a CFD model to simulate the dispersion of atmospheric NH3 in a semi-open barn Using a hybrid approach for wind power forecasting in Northwestern Mexico Threats to tropical wetlands: Medio Queso Wetland as a case of degraded system Performance evaluation of the WRF model under different physical schemes for air quality purposes in Buenos Aires, Argentina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1