Isometric hip abduction and adduction strength ratios: A literature review with quantitative synthesis

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Isokinetics and Exercise Science Pub Date : 2023-05-29 DOI:10.3233/ies-220128
J. Marušič, Ž. Kozinc, V. Hadžić, N. Šarabon
{"title":"Isometric hip abduction and adduction strength ratios: A literature review with quantitative synthesis","authors":"J. Marušič, Ž. Kozinc, V. Hadžić, N. Šarabon","doi":"10.3233/ies-220128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Measurements of hip abduction (ABD) and adduction (ADD) are important in strength and conditioning as well as in clinical practice. However, there is no clear consensus on how ABD and ADD compare in strength in different populations. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to perform a quantitative synthesis of comparisons between the isometric strength of ABD and ADD in different populations. METHODS: ABD and ADD strength data were collected and pooled mean values for ABD: ADD strength ratio were calculated and expressed as standardized mean differences. Forty studies of healthy adults, 5 studies of healthy older adults and 14 studies of adults with various musculoskeletal injuries were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Healthy (non-athletic) males, healthy older adults, and adults with hip and groin pathologies or osteoarthritis tend to have the same ADD and ABD strength; male athletes tend to have a stronger ADD compared with ABD; healthy females and adults with patellofemoral pain tend to have a stronger ABD compared with ADD. CONCLUSIONS: These results can serve as a database to help compare and interpret measurements of ADD and ABD strength ratio in different populations.","PeriodicalId":54915,"journal":{"name":"Isokinetics and Exercise Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Isokinetics and Exercise Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ies-220128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Measurements of hip abduction (ABD) and adduction (ADD) are important in strength and conditioning as well as in clinical practice. However, there is no clear consensus on how ABD and ADD compare in strength in different populations. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to perform a quantitative synthesis of comparisons between the isometric strength of ABD and ADD in different populations. METHODS: ABD and ADD strength data were collected and pooled mean values for ABD: ADD strength ratio were calculated and expressed as standardized mean differences. Forty studies of healthy adults, 5 studies of healthy older adults and 14 studies of adults with various musculoskeletal injuries were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Healthy (non-athletic) males, healthy older adults, and adults with hip and groin pathologies or osteoarthritis tend to have the same ADD and ABD strength; male athletes tend to have a stronger ADD compared with ABD; healthy females and adults with patellofemoral pain tend to have a stronger ABD compared with ADD. CONCLUSIONS: These results can serve as a database to help compare and interpret measurements of ADD and ABD strength ratio in different populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
等距髋外展和内收力量比:定量综合的文献综述
背景:髋关节外展(ABD)和内收(ADD)的测量在力量训练和临床实践中都很重要。然而,对于ABD和ADD在不同人群中的强度比较,目前还没有明确的共识。目的:对不同人群中ABD和ADD的等长强度进行定量综合比较。方法:收集ABD和ADD强度数据,计算ABD:ADD强度比的合并平均值,并表示为标准化平均差。分析中包括40项针对健康成年人的研究、5项针对健康老年人的研究和14项针对患有各种肌肉骨骼损伤的成年人的研究。结果:健康(非运动型)男性、健康老年人以及患有髋关节和腹股沟病变或骨关节炎的成年人往往具有相同的ADD和ABD强度;与ABD相比,男性运动员往往有更强的ADD;与ADD相比,患有髌股疼痛的健康女性和成人往往具有更强的ABD。结论:这些结果可以作为一个数据库,帮助比较和解释不同人群中ADD和ABD强度比的测量结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Isokinetics and Exercise Science
Isokinetics and Exercise Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Isokinetics and Exercise Science (IES) is an international journal devoted to the study of theoretical and applied aspects of human muscle performance. Since isokinetic dynamometry constitutes the major tool in this area, the journal takes a particular interest in exploring the considerable potential of this technology. IES publishes studies associated with the methodology of muscle performance especially with respect to the issues of reproducibility and validity of testing, description of normal and pathological mechanical parameters which are derivable from muscle testing, applications in basic research topics such as motor learning paradigms and electromyography. The journal also publishes studies on applications in clinical settings and technical aspects of the various measurement systems employed in human muscle performance research. The journal welcomes submissions in the form of research papers, reviews, case studies and technical reports from professionals in the fields of sports medicine, orthopaedic and neurological rehabilitation and exercise physiology.
期刊最新文献
The relationship between asymmetry changes in the slope frequency of bioelectrical activity of the gluteus maximus muscles and experience in short track speed skating athletics The effect of fatigue on strength-power tests for distinguishing elite-level male kickboxers The effects of different velocity loss training protocols after 3 weeks of resistance training on muscular strength and power Optimizing warm-up efficiency: Impact of repetitions in straight leg raises on hip and knee flexibility in individuals with and without hamstring tightness The useful lean tissue and appendicular skeletal muscle mass indices related to physical performance in patients undergoing hemodialysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1