Subjective wellbeing of Italian healthcare professionals during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak: A quasi-experiment

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance International Journal of Wellbeing Pub Date : 2020-08-12 DOI:10.5502/IJW.V10I3.1313
Matteo Makowiecki, V. Ungaretti, Marta Arzilli, L. Urbani, Matteo Cecchi, M. Maielli, S. Ardis
{"title":"Subjective wellbeing of Italian healthcare professionals during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak: A quasi-experiment","authors":"Matteo Makowiecki, V. Ungaretti, Marta Arzilli, L. Urbani, Matteo Cecchi, M. Maielli, S. Ardis","doi":"10.5502/IJW.V10I3.1313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Italy was one of the strongest hit countries from the SARS-CoV-2 and the healthcare system was put under exceptional stress during the outbreak The lockdown imposed on the population put the economy on hold and opened the way for a crisis that would have an impact on the healthcare system and the economy of the country This study compares levels of subjective wellbeing among healthcare professionals before the outbreak and during the most critical moment of the lockdown, when Italy was the first country in the world by number of infections Subjective wellbeing was measured with emotional wellbeing, job satisfaction, global happiness and satisfaction with life Each measure was compared before and during the outbreak as well as among different subgroups of respondents A special attention was put on inequalities in professional level, gender and educational level as well as their effect on subjective wellbeing The study finds that while emotional wellbeing had a slight decrease, other measures were untouched and job satisfaction even increased during the lockdown period Present wellbeing differences based in inequalities in professional and educational level were lifted once professionals were fighting the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak This decrease in inequalities and increase in job satisfaction might be strongly related to a newfound trust in healthcare professionals, a high gratitude from the population and a feeling of accomplishment and meaning as described in the PERMA model The findings of this study should help healthcare organizations to keep inequalities low as well as other organizations to apply those learnings in their structure © 2020, International Journal of Wellbeing Charitable Trust All rights reserved","PeriodicalId":36390,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Wellbeing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Wellbeing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5502/IJW.V10I3.1313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Italy was one of the strongest hit countries from the SARS-CoV-2 and the healthcare system was put under exceptional stress during the outbreak The lockdown imposed on the population put the economy on hold and opened the way for a crisis that would have an impact on the healthcare system and the economy of the country This study compares levels of subjective wellbeing among healthcare professionals before the outbreak and during the most critical moment of the lockdown, when Italy was the first country in the world by number of infections Subjective wellbeing was measured with emotional wellbeing, job satisfaction, global happiness and satisfaction with life Each measure was compared before and during the outbreak as well as among different subgroups of respondents A special attention was put on inequalities in professional level, gender and educational level as well as their effect on subjective wellbeing The study finds that while emotional wellbeing had a slight decrease, other measures were untouched and job satisfaction even increased during the lockdown period Present wellbeing differences based in inequalities in professional and educational level were lifted once professionals were fighting the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak This decrease in inequalities and increase in job satisfaction might be strongly related to a newfound trust in healthcare professionals, a high gratitude from the population and a feeling of accomplishment and meaning as described in the PERMA model The findings of this study should help healthcare organizations to keep inequalities low as well as other organizations to apply those learnings in their structure © 2020, International Journal of Wellbeing Charitable Trust All rights reserved
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SARS-CoV-2爆发期间意大利医护人员的主观幸福感:一项准实验
意大利是严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型疫情最严重的国家之一,在疫情爆发期间,医疗系统承受着异常的压力。对民众实施的封锁使经济陷入停滞,并为一场将对医疗系统和该国经济产生影响的危机开辟了道路。这项研究比较了医疗保健人员的主观幸福感水平在疫情爆发前和封锁最关键的时刻,意大利是世界上第一个感染人数最多的国家。主观幸福感是用情绪幸福感、工作满意度来衡量的,全球幸福感和生活满意度在疫情爆发前和疫情期间以及不同亚组的受访者之间对每项指标进行了比较。特别关注专业水平、性别和教育水平的不平等及其对主观幸福感的影响。研究发现,虽然情绪幸福感略有下降,在封锁期间,其他措施没有受到影响,工作满意度甚至有所提高。一旦专业人员抗击严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型疫情,基于专业和教育水平不平等的幸福感差异就会消除。不平等的减少和工作满意度的提高可能与对医疗专业人员的新信任密切相关,如PERMA模型所述,民众的高度感激之情以及成就感和意义感这项研究的发现应该有助于医疗保健组织降低不平等现象,并有助于其他组织将这些知识应用到其结构中©2020,《国际福利慈善信托杂志》版权所有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Wellbeing
International Journal of Wellbeing Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
A provisional global comparison framework: One hundred psychologically salient ways of conceptualizing and evaluating the world Beyond a single story: The heterogeneity of human flourishing in 22 countries The brief thriving scale: Assessing the ability to learn, grow, and find benefits in stressful events Well-being and ill-being on campus Brief computerised self-help interventions, the “Miracle Question,” and the moderating effects of openness-to-experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1