Larvicidal Activities and Synergistic Effects of Essential Oils against Anopheles funestus and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) from Kisumu, Kenya

IF 1.6 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY Psyche: A Journal of Entomology Pub Date : 2022-03-08 DOI:10.1155/2022/8302696
D. W. Wangrawa, Jackline Kosgei, Maxwell Machani, James Opala, Silas Agumba, Félix Yaméogo, D. Borovsky, E. Ochomo
{"title":"Larvicidal Activities and Synergistic Effects of Essential Oils against Anopheles funestus and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) from Kisumu, Kenya","authors":"D. W. Wangrawa, Jackline Kosgei, Maxwell Machani, James Opala, Silas Agumba, Félix Yaméogo, D. Borovsky, E. Ochomo","doi":"10.1155/2022/8302696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rapid development of resistance in vector mosquitoes to synthetic insecticides is a major challenge for malaria control. The use of plant-derived essential oils (EOs) is an attractive strategy in controlling mosquito populations because they are environmentally safe and may have a lower chance of developing resistance. This study assessed the larvicidal activities of EOs from Lantana camara, Lippia multiflora, Lippia chevalieri, and Cymbopogon schoenanthus against Anopheles funestus and Culex quinquefasciatus. The 3rd–4th instar larvae were tested using a World Health Organization (WHO)-modified protocol to evaluate larval mortality 24 h after exposure to EOs and their binary combinations. Culex quinquefasciatus larvae were more susceptible to EOs than An. funestus larvae. For Cx. quinquefasciatus, the lethal concentrations at 50% mortality (LC50s) of EOs from C. schoenanthus, L. multiflora, L. camara, and L. chevalieri were 23.32, 27.24, 38.54, and 54.11 ppm, respectively; whereas for An. funestus, the EO LC50s were 120.5, 67.5, 49.21, and 105.74 ppm, respectively. Synergistic effects were observed using EOs from C. schoenanthus + L. multiflora (LC50 = 44.05 ppm) on An. funestus, while L. camara + L. chevalieri (LC50 = 33.16 ppm), L. chevalieri + C. schoenanthus (LC50 = 12.08 ppm), and L. multiflora + L. chevalieri (LC50 = 20.61 ppm) were synergistic for Cx. quinquefasciatus. These results indicate the potential of EOs derived from local plants and their binary combinations as botanical larvicides. The EOs could be used as future ecofriendly agents to control these vectors.","PeriodicalId":20890,"journal":{"name":"Psyche: A Journal of Entomology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psyche: A Journal of Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8302696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Rapid development of resistance in vector mosquitoes to synthetic insecticides is a major challenge for malaria control. The use of plant-derived essential oils (EOs) is an attractive strategy in controlling mosquito populations because they are environmentally safe and may have a lower chance of developing resistance. This study assessed the larvicidal activities of EOs from Lantana camara, Lippia multiflora, Lippia chevalieri, and Cymbopogon schoenanthus against Anopheles funestus and Culex quinquefasciatus. The 3rd–4th instar larvae were tested using a World Health Organization (WHO)-modified protocol to evaluate larval mortality 24 h after exposure to EOs and their binary combinations. Culex quinquefasciatus larvae were more susceptible to EOs than An. funestus larvae. For Cx. quinquefasciatus, the lethal concentrations at 50% mortality (LC50s) of EOs from C. schoenanthus, L. multiflora, L. camara, and L. chevalieri were 23.32, 27.24, 38.54, and 54.11 ppm, respectively; whereas for An. funestus, the EO LC50s were 120.5, 67.5, 49.21, and 105.74 ppm, respectively. Synergistic effects were observed using EOs from C. schoenanthus + L. multiflora (LC50 = 44.05 ppm) on An. funestus, while L. camara + L. chevalieri (LC50 = 33.16 ppm), L. chevalieri + C. schoenanthus (LC50 = 12.08 ppm), and L. multiflora + L. chevalieri (LC50 = 20.61 ppm) were synergistic for Cx. quinquefasciatus. These results indicate the potential of EOs derived from local plants and their binary combinations as botanical larvicides. The EOs could be used as future ecofriendly agents to control these vectors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精油对肯尼亚基苏木地区富氏按蚊和致倦库蚊的杀幼虫活性及增效作用
病媒蚊子对合成杀虫剂的抗药性迅速发展是疟疾控制面临的一大挑战。使用植物源性精油是控制蚊子数量的一种有吸引力的策略,因为它们对环境安全,而且产生抗药性的可能性较低。本研究评价了大柳杉、多花Lippia multiflora、chevalieri Lippia chevalieri和Cymbopogon schoenanthus 4种植物的幼虫对富氏按蚊和致倦库蚊的杀幼虫活性。采用世界卫生组织(World Health Organization, WHO)修订方案,对暴露于EOs及其二元组合24 h后的3 ~ 4龄幼虫进行了死亡率评估。致倦库蚊幼虫对EOs的易感程度高于安蚊。funestus幼虫。残雪。致倦库蚊的50%致死浓度(lc50)分别为23.32、27.24、38.54和54.11 ppm;而对于An。结果表明,其EO lc50分别为120.5、67.5、49.21和105.74 ppm。用花楸+ L的EOs观察了协同效应。(LC50 = 44.05 ppm);L. camara + L.;(LC50 = 33.16 ppm), L. chevalieri + C.;(LC50 = 12.08 ppm);chevalieri (LC50 = 20.61 ppm)对Cx有增效作用。quinquefasciatus。这些结果表明,从当地植物中提取的EOs及其二元组合具有作为植物性杀幼虫剂的潜力。EOs可以作为未来的生态友好型代理来控制这些载体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Occurrence and Pathogenicity of Indigenous Entomopathogenic Fungi Isolates to Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda J. E. Smith) in Western Amhara, Ethiopia Lavender and Geranium Essential Oil-Loaded Nanogels with Promising Repellent and Antibacterial Effects Biology of the Endemic Endangered Swallowtail Butterfly, Papilio desmondi teita (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae), on Wild Citrus Species in Taita Hills, Kenya Current Knowledge and Perception of Edible Grasshopper/Locusts’ Consumption in Western Kenya Mass Trapping of Live Male Bactrocera dorsalis Hendel (Diptera: Tephritidae): Interaction between Trap Types and Period of Trapping
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1