Pelvic floor myofascial pain in gynecology oncology patients: A pilot study

IF 0.6 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders Pub Date : 2021-01-18 DOI:10.1177/2284026520984412
L. McAlarnen, Jean Ricci Goodman, A. Sarwark, A. Winder, R. Potkul, M. Liotta
{"title":"Pelvic floor myofascial pain in gynecology oncology patients: A pilot study","authors":"L. McAlarnen, Jean Ricci Goodman, A. Sarwark, A. Winder, R. Potkul, M. Liotta","doi":"10.1177/2284026520984412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Here we present a pilot study investigating the prevalence of pelvic floor myofascial pain in patients presenting to an academic tertiary care gynecologic oncology clinic. We describe patients’ responses to a pain survey including the pain disability index. Methods: An IRB approved prospective survey and chart review was conducted. Patients underwent standard physical exam maneuvers for detection of pelvic floor myofascial pain. Consented patients completed a pain survey and pain disability index on presentation to clinic. Statistical analysis included Chi square test and Mann Whitney test. Results: Twenty-nine percent (45/155) of patients exhibited pelvic floor myofascial pain, while 71% (110/155) did not. Of those with malignancy, 28% (16/57) had pelvic floor myofascial pain and 72% (41/57) did not. Patients with pelvic floor myofascial pain had a significantly higher rating of “pain right now” (p = 0.001) and “usual level of pain during the past week” (p = 0.003) than those without such pain. Patients with pelvic floor myofascial pain had significantly greater disability in family/home responsibilities (p = 0.01), recreation (p = 0.001), social activity (p = 0.008), occupation (p = 0.015), sexual behavior (p = 0.025), and life support activities (p = 0.007) compared to those without pelvic floor myofascial pain. Conclusion: Pelvic floor myofascial pain affects 28% of patients with malignancy. Routine incorporation of a myofascial exam can identity those with such pain, which can lead to improved quality of life in gynecologic oncology patients with pelvic floor disorders.","PeriodicalId":15725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders","volume":"13 1","pages":"142 - 148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2284026520984412","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2284026520984412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Here we present a pilot study investigating the prevalence of pelvic floor myofascial pain in patients presenting to an academic tertiary care gynecologic oncology clinic. We describe patients’ responses to a pain survey including the pain disability index. Methods: An IRB approved prospective survey and chart review was conducted. Patients underwent standard physical exam maneuvers for detection of pelvic floor myofascial pain. Consented patients completed a pain survey and pain disability index on presentation to clinic. Statistical analysis included Chi square test and Mann Whitney test. Results: Twenty-nine percent (45/155) of patients exhibited pelvic floor myofascial pain, while 71% (110/155) did not. Of those with malignancy, 28% (16/57) had pelvic floor myofascial pain and 72% (41/57) did not. Patients with pelvic floor myofascial pain had a significantly higher rating of “pain right now” (p = 0.001) and “usual level of pain during the past week” (p = 0.003) than those without such pain. Patients with pelvic floor myofascial pain had significantly greater disability in family/home responsibilities (p = 0.01), recreation (p = 0.001), social activity (p = 0.008), occupation (p = 0.015), sexual behavior (p = 0.025), and life support activities (p = 0.007) compared to those without pelvic floor myofascial pain. Conclusion: Pelvic floor myofascial pain affects 28% of patients with malignancy. Routine incorporation of a myofascial exam can identity those with such pain, which can lead to improved quality of life in gynecologic oncology patients with pelvic floor disorders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇科肿瘤患者盆底肌筋膜疼痛:一项初步研究
目的:在这里,我们提出了一项初步研究,调查在学术三级护理妇科肿瘤诊所就诊的患者中盆底肌筋膜疼痛的患病率。我们描述了患者对疼痛调查的反应,包括疼痛残疾指数。方法:进行IRB批准的前瞻性调查和图表审查。患者接受了标准的体格检查,以检测盆底肌筋膜疼痛。同意的患者在临床上完成了疼痛调查和疼痛残疾指数。统计分析包括卡方检验和曼-惠特尼检验。结果:29%(45/155)的患者表现出盆底肌筋膜疼痛,71%(110/155)的患者没有。在恶性肿瘤患者中,28%(16/57)有盆底肌筋膜疼痛,72%(41/57)没有。盆底肌筋膜疼痛患者的“现在疼痛”评分明显更高(p = 0.001)和“过去一周的正常疼痛程度”(p = 0.003)。盆底肌筋膜疼痛患者在家庭/家庭责任方面有更大的残疾(p = 0.01),娱乐(p = 0.001),社会活动(p = 0.008),职业(p = 0.015),性行为(p = 0.025)和生命支持活动(p = 0.007)。结论:骨盆底肌筋膜疼痛影响28%的恶性肿瘤患者。常规合并肌筋膜检查可以识别这些疼痛的患者,这可以提高患有盆底疾病的妇科肿瘤患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Endometriosis on TikTok: Evaluating social media misinformation and the role of healthcare professionals When cystoscopy catches what laparoscopy misses: The role of cystoscopy in evaluation of bladder endometriosis Comprehensive management of umbilical endometriosis using a unique laparoscopic entry portal (Darwish point) and postoperative Dienogest Chronic pelvic pain: An underrecognised perioperative consideration The Holy Grail of endometriosis biomarkers in the diagnostic process – How much would it be worth and what does it look like?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1