{"title":"Between- versus Within-Examinee Variability in Test-Taking Effort and Test Emotions during a Low-Stakes Test","authors":"B. Perkins, D. Pastor, S. Finney","doi":"10.1080/08957347.2021.1987905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT When tests are low stakes for examinees, meaning there are little to no personal consequences associated with test results, some examinees put little effort into their performance. To understand the causes and consequences of diminished effort, researchers correlate test-taking effort with other variables, such as test-taking emotions and test performance. Most studies correlate examinees’ overall level of test-taking effort with other variables, with fewer studies considering variables related to changing effort levels during testing. To understand if fluctuations in effort during testing relate to fluctuations in emotions, we collected effort and emotions (anger, boredom, emotionality, enjoyment, pride, worry) data from 768 university students three times during a low-stakes institutional accountability test. Examinees greatly varied in their average levels of effort and average levels of emotions during testing; relatively less variability was observed in these variables during testing. Average levels of emotions were predictive of effort, but fluctuations in emotions during testing were not. Our findings indicate that researchers should consider the proportion of intraindividual and interindividual variability in effort when considering predictors of test-taking effort.","PeriodicalId":51609,"journal":{"name":"Applied Measurement in Education","volume":"34 1","pages":"285 - 300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Measurement in Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2021.1987905","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT When tests are low stakes for examinees, meaning there are little to no personal consequences associated with test results, some examinees put little effort into their performance. To understand the causes and consequences of diminished effort, researchers correlate test-taking effort with other variables, such as test-taking emotions and test performance. Most studies correlate examinees’ overall level of test-taking effort with other variables, with fewer studies considering variables related to changing effort levels during testing. To understand if fluctuations in effort during testing relate to fluctuations in emotions, we collected effort and emotions (anger, boredom, emotionality, enjoyment, pride, worry) data from 768 university students three times during a low-stakes institutional accountability test. Examinees greatly varied in their average levels of effort and average levels of emotions during testing; relatively less variability was observed in these variables during testing. Average levels of emotions were predictive of effort, but fluctuations in emotions during testing were not. Our findings indicate that researchers should consider the proportion of intraindividual and interindividual variability in effort when considering predictors of test-taking effort.
期刊介绍:
Because interaction between the domains of research and application is critical to the evaluation and improvement of new educational measurement practices, Applied Measurement in Education" prime objective is to improve communication between academicians and practitioners. To help bridge the gap between theory and practice, articles in this journal describe original research studies, innovative strategies for solving educational measurement problems, and integrative reviews of current approaches to contemporary measurement issues. Peer Review Policy: All review papers in this journal have undergone editorial screening and peer review.