The Franco-German Common Optional Matrimonial Property Regime: A Guide for Future European Harmonization

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW European Review of Private Law Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.54648/erpl2021025
Hannelore Thijs
{"title":"The Franco-German Common Optional Matrimonial Property Regime: A Guide for Future European Harmonization","authors":"Hannelore Thijs","doi":"10.54648/erpl2021025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2010, France and Germany introduced a common optional matrimonial property regime of participation in acquisitions in both countries. One of its goals was to establish European harmonization, up until then a rare occurrence in the broad field of family law. The harmonization journey was continued by Belgium in 2018, when the Franco-German agreement was taken over in the Belgian Civil Code. This article evaluates the Franco-German regime from both an internal and an external point of view in order to determine the success of this operation. In the internal analysis, the regime will be presented as a modern and balanced compromise between the French and German domestic participation in acquisition regimes. In the external analysis, the regime will be qualified as a legal transplant in Belgium that at this moment in time does not survive the operation. Despite this seemingly negative evaluation, the regime may still increase its success rate, provided all actors involved take the required measures. In any case, the regime should be welcomed as harmonization initiative, considering that new projects may learn from its successes as well as from its stumbling blocks.","PeriodicalId":43736,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Private Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Private Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2021025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2010, France and Germany introduced a common optional matrimonial property regime of participation in acquisitions in both countries. One of its goals was to establish European harmonization, up until then a rare occurrence in the broad field of family law. The harmonization journey was continued by Belgium in 2018, when the Franco-German agreement was taken over in the Belgian Civil Code. This article evaluates the Franco-German regime from both an internal and an external point of view in order to determine the success of this operation. In the internal analysis, the regime will be presented as a modern and balanced compromise between the French and German domestic participation in acquisition regimes. In the external analysis, the regime will be qualified as a legal transplant in Belgium that at this moment in time does not survive the operation. Despite this seemingly negative evaluation, the regime may still increase its success rate, provided all actors involved take the required measures. In any case, the regime should be welcomed as harmonization initiative, considering that new projects may learn from its successes as well as from its stumbling blocks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法德共同可选婚姻财产制度:未来欧洲协调的指南
2010年,法国和德国在两国引入了共同的参与收购的可选婚姻财产制度。其目标之一是建立欧洲统一,这在当时广泛的家庭法领域是罕见的。2018年,当法德协议被纳入《比利时民法典》时,比利时继续了这一协调之旅。本文从内部和外部两个角度对法德政权进行了评价,以确定这一行动的成功与否。在内部分析中,该制度将被描述为法国和德国国内参与收购制度之间的现代和平衡的妥协。在外部分析中,该政权将被视为比利时的合法移植,目前无法在手术中幸存下来。尽管有这种看似负面的评价,但只要所有相关行为者都采取必要的措施,该制度仍有可能提高成功率。无论如何,考虑到新项目既可以从其成功经验中学习,也可以从其绊脚石中学习,应该欢迎该制度作为协调举措。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Scope of Application of the Unfair Contract Terms Directive: Is It Time for a New Compromise? Remedies for Unfair Terms in Light of the General Principles of EU Law The Unfairness Test: From Sleeping Beauty to Little Mermaid The Objectives of Directive 93/13/EEC on Unfair Contract Terms: An Overview after 30 Years of Case Law Lost in information - The Transparency Dogma of the Unfair Contract Terms Directive
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1