Adversariality and Argumentation

IF 0.9 3区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Informal Logic Pub Date : 2020-02-28 DOI:10.22329/il.v40i1.5969

J. Casey

引用次数: 21

Abstract

The concept of adversariality, like that of argument, admits of significant variation. As a consequence, I argue, the question of adversarial argument has not been well understood. After defining adversariality, I argue that if we take argument to be about beliefs, rather than commitments, then two considerations show that adversariality is an essential part of it. First, beliefs are not under our direct voluntary control. Second, beliefs are costly both for the psychological states they provoke and for the fact that they are causally related to our actions. As a result, argument involving agreement can also be understood to be adversarial.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

对抗和辩论

对抗性的概念，就像争论的概念一样，可以有很大的变化。因此，我认为，对抗性论证的问题并没有得到很好的理解。在定义了对抗性之后，我认为如果我们把论证看作是关于信念的，而不是关于承诺的，那么有两个考虑表明对抗性是它的重要组成部分。首先，信念不受我们的直接自愿控制。其次，信念的代价是高昂的，因为它们所引发的心理状态，以及它们与我们的行为有因果关系这一事实。因此，涉及协议的争论也可以被理解为对抗性的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Informal Logic PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： Informal Logic publishes articles that advance the dialectic in reasoning and argumentation theory and practice. Primary criteria for the acceptance of articles with a theoretical focus or interest are: (1) the article advances the dialectic or constitutes an interesting comment on it: it presents a cogent argument, objection, interpretation or position that is an advance in relation to the background of issues and controversies on the topic; or it casts the issue addressed in a new and worthwhile light; and (2) the article makes explicit reference to the pertinent literature on its topic, and it discharges the burden of proof imposed by that scholarship. Primary criteria for acceptance of articles devoted to the teaching of informal logic, critical thinking or argumentation include: originality; utility; timeliness; and evidence of the effectiveness of the methods, materials, technologies, etc., proposed. The standard criteria for scholarly publication—topical fit with the subjects covered in the journal; adequacy of coverage to the issue addressed; clarity, organization and literateness of the prose; conceptual clarity and cogency of argumentation—apply ceteris paribus to the selection of all articles, notes and reviews.

期刊最新文献

Do We Really Not Know What Toulmin’s Analytic Arguments Are? Fact and Opinion Case Study of Contextual and Emotional Modulation of Source-case Selection in Analogical Arguments Are Fallacies Frequent ? Notice of Books Received