Ethno-Cultural Development of Ukrainian Society in the Conditions of russian Revanschism towards Ukraine at the End of the 20th — at the Beginning of the 21st Century: Periodization and Analysis

Yurii Fihurnyi, Olha Shakurova
{"title":"Ethno-Cultural Development of Ukrainian Society in the Conditions of russian Revanschism towards Ukraine at the End of the 20th — at the Beginning of the 21st Century: Periodization and Analysis","authors":"Yurii Fihurnyi, Olha Shakurova","doi":"10.30840/2413-7065.1(86).2023.275325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the ethno-cultural development of Ukrainian society in the conditions of russian revanchism towards Ukraine in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. It has been found that understanding the periodization of ethnocultural development of the Ukrainian society in the conditions of russia's revanchist course aimed to reсlaim imperial power, helps to draw conclusions about the achievements and mistakes made to improve the sustainable development of Ukraine on the path of Euro-Atlantic integration. It is noted that the ethno-cultural development of Ukrainian society in the conditions of revanchist-imperial policy of russia can be conditionally divided into five periods (stages): the first (1991–2004), the second (2005–2009), the third (2010–2013), the fourth (2014–2021), and the fifth (2022–present). This article examines the first two periods.The first period of ethnocultural development of Ukrainian society is the longest and is characterized by both positive and negative trends. Conventionally, it can be divided into two sub-periods: the first (1991–1999) and the second (2000–2004). It substantiated that this division is primarily caused by russia's revanchist policy towards Ukraine, since in 1999–1999 the Kremlin was solving its own socio-political problems and could not fully pay attention to Ukraine. It has been observed that after V. Putin came to power and the significant improvement of the political, economic, and financial situation in russia, the russian clique significantly increased its anti-Ukrainian influence on the Ukrainian ethno-cultural space.The second period of the ethno-cultural development of Ukrainian society is determined by the further expansion of the Ukrainian language functioning in social and political life, the educational process, in the spheres of science, culture, art, the film industry, etc. It is proven that the Кremlin, realising the danger of promoting the ideals and achievements of the Orange Revolution in the post-Soviet space, made considerable efforts to discredit and stigmatise it, using the newly created neo-imperial revanchist doctrine-concept of \"russian world\" for this purpose.","PeriodicalId":52730,"journal":{"name":"Ukrayinoznavstvo","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrayinoznavstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30840/2413-7065.1(86).2023.275325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the ethno-cultural development of Ukrainian society in the conditions of russian revanchism towards Ukraine in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. It has been found that understanding the periodization of ethnocultural development of the Ukrainian society in the conditions of russia's revanchist course aimed to reсlaim imperial power, helps to draw conclusions about the achievements and mistakes made to improve the sustainable development of Ukraine on the path of Euro-Atlantic integration. It is noted that the ethno-cultural development of Ukrainian society in the conditions of revanchist-imperial policy of russia can be conditionally divided into five periods (stages): the first (1991–2004), the second (2005–2009), the third (2010–2013), the fourth (2014–2021), and the fifth (2022–present). This article examines the first two periods.The first period of ethnocultural development of Ukrainian society is the longest and is characterized by both positive and negative trends. Conventionally, it can be divided into two sub-periods: the first (1991–1999) and the second (2000–2004). It substantiated that this division is primarily caused by russia's revanchist policy towards Ukraine, since in 1999–1999 the Kremlin was solving its own socio-political problems and could not fully pay attention to Ukraine. It has been observed that after V. Putin came to power and the significant improvement of the political, economic, and financial situation in russia, the russian clique significantly increased its anti-Ukrainian influence on the Ukrainian ethno-cultural space.The second period of the ethno-cultural development of Ukrainian society is determined by the further expansion of the Ukrainian language functioning in social and political life, the educational process, in the spheres of science, culture, art, the film industry, etc. It is proven that the Кremlin, realising the danger of promoting the ideals and achievements of the Orange Revolution in the post-Soviet space, made considerable efforts to discredit and stigmatise it, using the newly created neo-imperial revanchist doctrine-concept of "russian world" for this purpose.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
20世纪末至21世纪初俄罗斯对乌克兰复仇主义条件下乌克兰社会的民族文化发展:分期与分析
本文分析了20世纪末21世纪初俄罗斯对乌克兰复仇主义条件下乌克兰社会的民族文化发展。研究发现,在俄罗斯旨在重建帝国权力的复仇主义进程中,理解乌克兰社会民族文化发展的阶段性,有助于总结在促进乌克兰在欧洲-大西洋一体化道路上的可持续发展方面所取得的成就和犯下的错误。值得注意的是,在俄罗斯复仇主义帝国政策的条件下,乌克兰社会的民族文化发展可以有条件地分为五个阶段:第一阶段(1991-2004)、第二阶段(2005-2009)、第三阶段(2010-2013)、第四阶段(2014-20121)和第五阶段(2022年至今)。本文考察了前两个时期。乌克兰社会的第一个民族文化发展时期是最长的,具有积极和消极的趋势。按照惯例,它可以分为两个子时期:第一个时期(1991-1999)和第二个时期(2000-2004)。它证实,这种分裂主要是由俄罗斯对乌克兰的复仇主义政策造成的,因为在1999年至1999年,克里姆林宫正在解决自己的社会政治问题,无法完全关注乌克兰。有人观察到,在普京上台后,随着俄罗斯政治、经济和财政状况的显著改善,俄罗斯集团在乌克兰民族文化空间中的反乌克兰影响力显著增加。乌克兰社会民族文化发展的第二阶段是由乌克兰语在社会和政治生活、教育过程、科学、文化、艺术、电影工业等领域的功能的进一步扩展决定的,意识到在后苏联时代宣扬橙色革命的理想和成就的危险,他做出了相当大的努力来抹黑和污名化橙色革命,并为此目的使用了新创建的“俄罗斯世界”的新帝国主义复仇主义概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Multidimensionality of the Institutionalization of the Values of the Ukrainian Ethnic Group Stages of the Formation of the Ukrainian People as a Local Manifestation of the Universal Ethnogenetic Processes of Europe Formation and Preservation of the Identity of Ukrainian Culture as a Factor of State Formation The Latest Study of the Civilization Identity of Ukrainiannеss Methodological Aspects of the Study of Worldview and Existential Dimensions and Archaic Stages of the Spiritual Genesis of the Ukrainian Ethnos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1