Digital populism in an authoritarian context: A discourse analysis of the legitimization of the Belt and Road Initiative by China’s party media

IF 1.8 Q2 COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION REVIEW Pub Date : 2023-05-29 DOI:10.1080/10714421.2023.2214056
Le Cao, Runya Qiaoan
{"title":"Digital populism in an authoritarian context: A discourse analysis of the legitimization of the Belt and Road Initiative by China’s party media","authors":"Le Cao, Runya Qiaoan","doi":"10.1080/10714421.2023.2214056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study examines how the Chinese government has adopted authoritarian digital populism to justify its political programs through its official social media sub-accounts. Through discourse analysis, we investigate textual material concerning the “Belt and Road Initiative” (BRI) posted on a representative WeChat account, Xiakedao. We find Xiakedao performing digital populism through stylistic-emotional manipulation to portray the benefits of the BRI to China, BRI countries, and the world, or, put succinctly, to legitimize the BRI. Specifically, in 2014–2016, through mixing informal and formal language, Xiakedao based its legitimization on stirring up a sense of hegemonic superiority by painting it as a strategy capable of significantly advancing China’s interests. Since 2017, Xiakedao has shifted to emphasizing its massive global contribution to stimulate nationalist pride and exploiting a trauma complex to bestow a counter-hegemonic aura on it. Drawing on Laclau and Mouffe’s discourse theory, we argue that Xiakedao has utilized the terms “China” and “BRI” as an empty signifier and a floating signifier, respectively. We unravel its discursive strategies of fixing their meanings and (re)drawing antagonistic frontiers to legitimize the BRI during different periods. The study contributes to theoretically understanding how an authoritarian state legitimizes the same political programs from disparate stances.","PeriodicalId":46140,"journal":{"name":"COMMUNICATION REVIEW","volume":"26 1","pages":"350 - 389"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMMUNICATION REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2023.2214056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines how the Chinese government has adopted authoritarian digital populism to justify its political programs through its official social media sub-accounts. Through discourse analysis, we investigate textual material concerning the “Belt and Road Initiative” (BRI) posted on a representative WeChat account, Xiakedao. We find Xiakedao performing digital populism through stylistic-emotional manipulation to portray the benefits of the BRI to China, BRI countries, and the world, or, put succinctly, to legitimize the BRI. Specifically, in 2014–2016, through mixing informal and formal language, Xiakedao based its legitimization on stirring up a sense of hegemonic superiority by painting it as a strategy capable of significantly advancing China’s interests. Since 2017, Xiakedao has shifted to emphasizing its massive global contribution to stimulate nationalist pride and exploiting a trauma complex to bestow a counter-hegemonic aura on it. Drawing on Laclau and Mouffe’s discourse theory, we argue that Xiakedao has utilized the terms “China” and “BRI” as an empty signifier and a floating signifier, respectively. We unravel its discursive strategies of fixing their meanings and (re)drawing antagonistic frontiers to legitimize the BRI during different periods. The study contributes to theoretically understanding how an authoritarian state legitimizes the same political programs from disparate stances.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
威权语境下的数字民粹主义:中国党媒对“一带一路”倡议合法化的话语分析
摘要本研究考察了中国政府如何通过其官方社交媒体子账户采用威权数字民粹主义来为其政治计划辩护。通过话语分析,我们调查了一个有代表性的微信账号“下客岛”上发布的关于““一带一路”倡议倡议”(BRI)的文本材料。我们发现,侠客岛通过风格化的情感操纵来表演数字民粹主义,以描绘“一带一路”倡议对中国、“一带一步”倡议国家和世界的好处,或者,简单地说,是为了使“一带一程”倡议合法化。具体而言,在2014-2016年,通过混合非正式和正式语言,侠客岛将其合法化建立在煽动霸权优越感的基础上,将其描绘成一种能够显著促进中国利益的战略。自2017年以来,侠客岛已转向强调其在全球的巨大贡献,以激发民族主义自豪感,并利用创伤情结赋予其反霸权的光环。借鉴拉克劳和莫菲的话语理论,我们认为侠客岛分别将“中国”和“一带一路”作为一个空的能指和一个漂浮的能指。我们解开了它在不同时期固定其含义和(重新)划定对立边界以使“一带一路”倡议合法化的话语策略。这项研究有助于从理论上理解一个威权国家如何从不同的立场使同样的政治计划合法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
COMMUNICATION REVIEW
COMMUNICATION REVIEW COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
The assimilated secret: Understanding as silence in Japanese LGBT discourse Skilling communication: The discourse and metadiscourse of communication in self-help books Young climate activists in television news: An analysis of multimodal constructions of voice, political recognition, and co-optation Contexts and dimensions of algorithm literacies: parents’ algorithm literacies amidst the datafication of parenthood How U.S.-based children’s news show CNN 10 reproduces neoliberal hegemony: A critical discourse analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1