Accessibility of Participation in a Pollinator-Focused Community Science Project

Q1 Multidisciplinary Citizen Science Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2023-04-04 DOI:10.5334/cstp.557
Lauren Lynch, James Miller
{"title":"Accessibility of Participation in a Pollinator-Focused Community Science Project","authors":"Lauren Lynch, James Miller","doi":"10.5334/cstp.557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ecological research, education, and community engagement were interrupted globally in the spring and summer of 2020 because of the COVID-19 pandemic. To allow for continued data collection and to provide opportunities for people to interact with nature, we developed a community science project focusing on pollinator visitation to gardens and lawns. To evaluate the accessibility of this project to volunteers, we conducted 28 semi-structured interviews with people who participated in the project training. Interviewees experienced a number of barriers to participation, the most common of which were difficulty with the data collection procedure (n = 22), challenges using technology (n = 11), and lack of access to technology (n = 9). However, components of the online training and data collection procedure helped overcome some of these barriers. Strategies such as using a hybrid training format, simplifying the use of technology during training, and incorporating active learning into online workshops could increase participation in community science projects, both in the context of the pandemic and moving forward. © 2023 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.","PeriodicalId":32270,"journal":{"name":"Citizen Science Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Citizen Science Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Ecological research, education, and community engagement were interrupted globally in the spring and summer of 2020 because of the COVID-19 pandemic. To allow for continued data collection and to provide opportunities for people to interact with nature, we developed a community science project focusing on pollinator visitation to gardens and lawns. To evaluate the accessibility of this project to volunteers, we conducted 28 semi-structured interviews with people who participated in the project training. Interviewees experienced a number of barriers to participation, the most common of which were difficulty with the data collection procedure (n = 22), challenges using technology (n = 11), and lack of access to technology (n = 9). However, components of the online training and data collection procedure helped overcome some of these barriers. Strategies such as using a hybrid training format, simplifying the use of technology during training, and incorporating active learning into online workshops could increase participation in community science projects, both in the context of the pandemic and moving forward. © 2023 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以传粉媒介为中心的社区科学项目参与的可及性
由于2019冠状病毒病大流行,2020年春夏全球生态研究、教育和社区参与中断。为了继续收集数据,并为人们提供与自然互动的机会,我们开发了一个社区科学项目,重点关注授粉者对花园和草坪的访问。为了评估这个项目对志愿者的可及性,我们对参加项目培训的人进行了28次半结构化访谈。受访者在参与过程中遇到了许多障碍,其中最常见的是数据收集程序的困难(n = 22),使用技术的挑战(n = 11),以及缺乏获取技术的途径(n = 9)。然而,在线培训和数据收集程序的组成部分有助于克服其中一些障碍。诸如使用混合培训形式、简化培训期间技术的使用以及将主动学习纳入在线讲习班等战略可以增加社区科学项目的参与,无论是在大流行的背景下还是在未来。©2023作者。这是一篇根据知识共享署名4.0国际许可协议(CC-BY 4.0)发布的开放获取文章,该协议允许在任何媒体上不受限制地使用、分发和复制,前提是要注明原作者和来源。见http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Citizen Science Theory and Practice
Citizen Science Theory and Practice Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊最新文献
Snap Decisions: Assessing Participation and Data Quality in a Citizen Science Program Using Repeat Photography Diversifying Large-Scale Participatory Science: The Efficacy of Engagement through Facilitator Organizations “Every Small Action Helps Towards the Greater Cause:” Online Communities Scaling Up Online Community-Led Citizen Science in Addressing Litter Challenges in Scotland Cross-Project Analysis of Volunteers’ Scientific Observation Skills Citizen Scientist Participation in Research on Private Lands Positively Impacts Multiple Conservation Behaviors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1