Cry2A rice did not affect the interspecific interactions between two rice planthoppers, Nilaparvata lugens, and Sogatella furcifera.

IF 4.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Gm Crops & Food-Biotechnology in Agriculture and the Food Chain Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI:10.1080/21645698.2019.1649530
Cong Dang, Chuyi Sun, Zengbin Lu, Fujun Zhong, F. Wang, Qianjin Wang, Rui Sun, Yu-fa Peng, G. Yè
{"title":"Cry2A rice did not affect the interspecific interactions between two rice planthoppers, Nilaparvata lugens, and Sogatella furcifera.","authors":"Cong Dang, Chuyi Sun, Zengbin Lu, Fujun Zhong, F. Wang, Qianjin Wang, Rui Sun, Yu-fa Peng, G. Yè","doi":"10.1080/21645698.2019.1649530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interspecific interactions are complex in agro-ecosystems and could be affected by agricultural technologies including transgenic crop planting. Few studies focused on the effects of Bt crops on the interspecific interactions of non-target organisms. Here we assessed the effects of transgenic cry2A rice (Cry2A rice) on the interspecific interaction between two rice planthoppers, namely, Nilaparvata lugens (the brown planthopper, BPH) and Sogatella furcifera (the white-backed planthopper, WBPH). Cry2A rice showed no significant effects on most biological parameters of these two rice planthoppers, except for wet weight of BPH female adults and development duration of WBPH female nymphs. In contrast, interspecific interactions between BPH and WBPH showed significant impacts on their biological parameters, no matter on Cry2A rice or non-transgenic control. In two-factor analysis combing rice line and interspecific interaction together, the interaction between these two factors did not affect most biological parameters of neither planthopper species, except for development duration of BPH female nymphs and WBPH nymphs (both male and female). Additionally, the egg distributions of BPH and WBPH had no significant differences between Cry2A and non-Cry2A treatments. Results of field experiments showed that Cry2A rice did not affect their population densities at most sampling dates in a five-year survey, and the interaction between BPH and WBPH showed no significant differences in both Cry2A and non-Cry2A rice paddies. In conclusion, our tested Cry2A rice would not affect the interspecific interactions between BPH and WBPH based both laboratory and field results.","PeriodicalId":54282,"journal":{"name":"Gm Crops & Food-Biotechnology in Agriculture and the Food Chain","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21645698.2019.1649530","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gm Crops & Food-Biotechnology in Agriculture and the Food Chain","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2019.1649530","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Interspecific interactions are complex in agro-ecosystems and could be affected by agricultural technologies including transgenic crop planting. Few studies focused on the effects of Bt crops on the interspecific interactions of non-target organisms. Here we assessed the effects of transgenic cry2A rice (Cry2A rice) on the interspecific interaction between two rice planthoppers, namely, Nilaparvata lugens (the brown planthopper, BPH) and Sogatella furcifera (the white-backed planthopper, WBPH). Cry2A rice showed no significant effects on most biological parameters of these two rice planthoppers, except for wet weight of BPH female adults and development duration of WBPH female nymphs. In contrast, interspecific interactions between BPH and WBPH showed significant impacts on their biological parameters, no matter on Cry2A rice or non-transgenic control. In two-factor analysis combing rice line and interspecific interaction together, the interaction between these two factors did not affect most biological parameters of neither planthopper species, except for development duration of BPH female nymphs and WBPH nymphs (both male and female). Additionally, the egg distributions of BPH and WBPH had no significant differences between Cry2A and non-Cry2A treatments. Results of field experiments showed that Cry2A rice did not affect their population densities at most sampling dates in a five-year survey, and the interaction between BPH and WBPH showed no significant differences in both Cry2A and non-Cry2A rice paddies. In conclusion, our tested Cry2A rice would not affect the interspecific interactions between BPH and WBPH based both laboratory and field results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cry2A水稻对褐飞虱(Nilaparvata lugens)和褐飞虱(Sogatella furcifera)的种间相互作用没有影响。
种间相互作用在农业生态系统中是复杂的,并可能受到包括转基因作物种植在内的农业技术的影响。很少有研究关注Bt作物对非目标生物种间相互作用的影响。本研究评估了cry2A转基因水稻(cry2A水稻)对褐飞虱Nilaparvata lugens和白背飞虱Sogatella furcifera种间互作的影响。Cry2A水稻对这两种水稻飞虱的生物学指标除白斑飞虱雌成虫湿重和白斑飞虱雌若虫发育历期外,其余均无显著影响。相比之下,无论是Cry2A水稻还是非转基因对照,BPH和WBPH的种间互作对其生物学参数均有显著影响。在将水稻系与种间互作结合进行的双因子分析中,除BPH雌若虫和WBPH雌雄若虫的发育期外,这两个因子的互作对两种飞虱的大部分生物学参数均无影响。此外,在Cry2A和非Cry2A处理之间,BPH和WBPH的卵分布无显著差异。田间试验结果表明,在5年的调查中,Cry2A水稻在大多数采样日期对其种群密度没有影响,在Cry2A水稻和非Cry2A水稻中,BPH和WBPH的相互作用没有显著差异。总之,基于实验室和田间结果,我们测试的Cry2A水稻不会影响BPH和WBPH的种间相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gm Crops & Food-Biotechnology in Agriculture and the Food Chain
Gm Crops & Food-Biotechnology in Agriculture and the Food Chain Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: GM Crops & Food - Biotechnology in Agriculture and the Food Chain aims to publish high quality research papers, reviews, and commentaries on a wide range of topics involving genetically modified (GM) crops in agriculture and genetically modified food. The journal provides a platform for research papers addressing fundamental questions in the development, testing, and application of transgenic crops. The journal further covers topics relating to socio-economic issues, commercialization, trade and societal issues. GM Crops & Food aims to provide an international forum on all issues related to GM crops, especially toward meaningful communication between scientists and policy-makers. GM Crops & Food will publish relevant and high-impact original research with a special focus on novelty-driven studies with the potential for application. The journal also publishes authoritative review articles on current research and policy initiatives, and commentary on broad perspectives regarding genetically modified crops. The journal serves a wide readership including scientists, breeders, and policy-makers, as well as a wider community of readers (educators, policy makers, scholars, science writers and students) interested in agriculture, medicine, biotechnology, investment, and technology transfer. Topics covered include, but are not limited to: • Production and analysis of transgenic crops • Gene insertion studies • Gene silencing • Factors affecting gene expression • Post-translational analysis • Molecular farming • Field trial analysis • Commercialization of modified crops • Safety and regulatory affairs BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY • Biofuels • Data from field trials • Development of transformation technology • Elimination of pollutants (Bioremediation) • Gene silencing mechanisms • Genome Editing • Herbicide resistance • Molecular farming • Pest resistance • Plant reproduction (e.g., male sterility, hybrid breeding, apomixis) • Plants with altered composition • Tolerance to abiotic stress • Transgenesis in agriculture • Biofortification and nutrients improvement • Genomic, proteomic and bioinformatics methods used for developing GM cops ECONOMIC, POLITICAL AND SOCIAL ISSUES • Commercialization • Consumer attitudes • International bodies • National and local government policies • Public perception, intellectual property, education, (bio)ethical issues • Regulation, environmental impact and containment • Socio-economic impact • Food safety and security • Risk assessments
期刊最新文献
Risk-appropriate regulations for gene-editing technologies. An environmental risk assessment of IPD079Ea: a protein derived from Ophioglossum pendulum with activity against Diabrotica spp.In maize. Agricultural chemical use and the rural-urban divide in Canada. Exploring the GMO narrative through labeling: strategies, products, and politics. Cloning and functional analysis of ZmMADS42 gene in maize.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1