{"title":"\"It Has Always Been Customary to Make Slaves of Savages\": The Problem of Indian Slavery in Spanish Louisiana Revisited, 1769–1803","authors":"Leila K. Blackbird","doi":"10.1353/wmq.2023.a903166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The enslavement of Indigenous peoples by Europeans was not a small and isolated practice in the lands that now comprise the United States. Contests for land and labor were not mutually exclusive, and enslaved Native people labored in mines, domestic households, and plantations across North America. In the vast Louisiana Colony, French records frequently enumerated enslaved Indigenous people, but their presence is conspicuously absent from Spanish period records. Scholars have previously assumed that the practice of Indian slavery had simply been outlawed and any remaining Indian slaves were emancipated under the Leyes y Ordenanzas Nuevamente de las Indias after Don Alejandro O'Reilly raised the Spanish flag over New Orleans in August 1769. However, the very first case brought before the Louisiana State Supreme Court disproves that assumption. During the period of its supposed illegality, Indigenous enslavement persisted through a discursive practice of Indigenous erasure; changing notions of race and legal personhood hid enslaved Native Americans within a socioracial order that negated their existence. These machinations allowed \"Indianness\" to be controlled and exploited, and Native people continued to be trafficked and enslaved across the Gulf South into the antebellum period. Their stories must become part of the broader history of American slavery.","PeriodicalId":51566,"journal":{"name":"WILLIAM AND MARY QUARTERLY","volume":"80 1","pages":"525 - 558"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WILLIAM AND MARY QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wmq.2023.a903166","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract:The enslavement of Indigenous peoples by Europeans was not a small and isolated practice in the lands that now comprise the United States. Contests for land and labor were not mutually exclusive, and enslaved Native people labored in mines, domestic households, and plantations across North America. In the vast Louisiana Colony, French records frequently enumerated enslaved Indigenous people, but their presence is conspicuously absent from Spanish period records. Scholars have previously assumed that the practice of Indian slavery had simply been outlawed and any remaining Indian slaves were emancipated under the Leyes y Ordenanzas Nuevamente de las Indias after Don Alejandro O'Reilly raised the Spanish flag over New Orleans in August 1769. However, the very first case brought before the Louisiana State Supreme Court disproves that assumption. During the period of its supposed illegality, Indigenous enslavement persisted through a discursive practice of Indigenous erasure; changing notions of race and legal personhood hid enslaved Native Americans within a socioracial order that negated their existence. These machinations allowed "Indianness" to be controlled and exploited, and Native people continued to be trafficked and enslaved across the Gulf South into the antebellum period. Their stories must become part of the broader history of American slavery.
摘要:在现在美国的土地上,欧洲人奴役土著人民并不是一种小而孤立的做法。土地和劳动力的争夺并不是相互排斥的,被奴役的原住民在北美各地的矿山、家庭和种植园劳动。在广阔的路易斯安那殖民地,法国的记录经常列举被奴役的土著人,但他们的存在显然没有出现在西班牙时期的记录中。学者们此前认为,1769年8月,唐·亚历杭德罗·奥莱利在新奥尔良上空升起西班牙国旗后,印度奴隶的做法已经被宣布为非法,任何剩余的印度奴隶都在Leyes y Ordenanzas Nuevamente de las Indias的统治下获得了解放。然而,路易斯安那州最高法院受理的第一个案件推翻了这一假设。在被认为是非法的时期,土著奴役通过一种对土著人的抹杀的散漫实践而持续存在;不断变化的种族和法人观念将被奴役的美洲原住民隐藏在否定他们存在的社会种族秩序中。这些阴谋使“印第安人”得以控制和剥削,原住民继续在海湾南部被贩卖和奴役,直到南北战争前。他们的故事必须成为美国奴隶制更广泛历史的一部分。