Simulating the Effects of Pesticides on Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Colonies with BeePop+

IF 1.7 Q3 ECOLOGY Ecologies Pub Date : 2022-07-25 DOI:10.3390/ecologies3030022
K. Garber, G. DeGrandi-Hoffman, R. Curry, Jeffrey M. Minucci, Daniel E. Dawson, C. Douglass, Joseph P. Milone, S. Purucker
{"title":"Simulating the Effects of Pesticides on Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Colonies with BeePop+","authors":"K. Garber, G. DeGrandi-Hoffman, R. Curry, Jeffrey M. Minucci, Daniel E. Dawson, C. Douglass, Joseph P. Milone, S. Purucker","doi":"10.3390/ecologies3030022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) employs a tiered process for assessing risks of pesticides to bees. The model discussed in this paper focuses on honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). If risks to honey bees are identified at the first tier based on exposure and toxicity data for individual adult and larval honey bees, then effects are evaluated in higher-tier studies using honey bee colonies. Colony-level studies require large amounts of resources (to conduct and review) and can yield data complicated by the inherent variability of colonies, which are influenced by factors that cannot readily be controlled, including weather, pests, diseases, available forage, and bee management practices. To better interpret these data, the USEPA and the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) developed a simulation model, BeePop+, that assesses potential honey bee colony-level effects of pesticides. Here, we describe this model using the population model guidance, use, interpretation, and development for ecological risk assessment (Pop-GUIDE) framework, which is a conceptual framework for the development and evaluation of population models. Within the context of Pop-GUIDE, BeePop+ is considered a “realistic-precise” model and reflects the inherent variability of colony response to pesticide exposure by simulating many outcomes. This model meets the desired features needed for use in pesticide risk assessments as its required data inputs are typically available, it is applicable to different US locations, and the outputs are both relevant to USEPA’s protection goals for honey bees and are consistent with the outcomes of empirical studies. This model has also been evaluated using available empirical colony-level data; however, additional evaluation with other studies may still be done in the future prior to completing implementation.","PeriodicalId":72866,"journal":{"name":"Ecologies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies3030022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) employs a tiered process for assessing risks of pesticides to bees. The model discussed in this paper focuses on honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). If risks to honey bees are identified at the first tier based on exposure and toxicity data for individual adult and larval honey bees, then effects are evaluated in higher-tier studies using honey bee colonies. Colony-level studies require large amounts of resources (to conduct and review) and can yield data complicated by the inherent variability of colonies, which are influenced by factors that cannot readily be controlled, including weather, pests, diseases, available forage, and bee management practices. To better interpret these data, the USEPA and the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) developed a simulation model, BeePop+, that assesses potential honey bee colony-level effects of pesticides. Here, we describe this model using the population model guidance, use, interpretation, and development for ecological risk assessment (Pop-GUIDE) framework, which is a conceptual framework for the development and evaluation of population models. Within the context of Pop-GUIDE, BeePop+ is considered a “realistic-precise” model and reflects the inherent variability of colony response to pesticide exposure by simulating many outcomes. This model meets the desired features needed for use in pesticide risk assessments as its required data inputs are typically available, it is applicable to different US locations, and the outputs are both relevant to USEPA’s protection goals for honey bees and are consistent with the outcomes of empirical studies. This model has also been evaluated using available empirical colony-level data; however, additional evaluation with other studies may still be done in the future prior to completing implementation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农药对蜜蜂影响的模拟研究BeePop+菌落
美国环境保护局(USEPA)采用分级程序来评估杀虫剂对蜜蜂的风险。本文讨论的模型主要针对蜜蜂(Apis mellifera L.)。如果根据单个成年和幼虫蜜蜂的暴露和毒性数据,在第一层确定蜜蜂的风险,那么在使用蜜蜂群落的更高层研究中评估其影响。菌落水平的研究需要大量的资源(进行和审查),并且可能产生因菌落固有变异性而复杂的数据,这些变异性受到无法轻易控制的因素的影响,包括天气、害虫、疾病、可用饲料和蜜蜂管理实践。为了更好地解释这些数据,美国环保局和美国农业部开发了一个模拟模型BeePop+,用于评估杀虫剂对蜜蜂群体水平的潜在影响。在这里,我们使用人口模型指导、使用、解释和开发生态风险评估(Pop-GUIDE)框架来描述该模型,该框架是人口模型开发和评估的概念框架。在流行指南的背景下,BeePop+被认为是一个“现实的精确”模型,通过模拟许多结果反映了群体对农药暴露反应的固有可变性。该模型符合农药风险评估所需的特征,因为其所需的数据输入通常可用,适用于美国不同地区,其输出既与美国环保局的蜜蜂保护目标相关,又与实证研究结果一致。该模型也使用现有的经验群体水平数据进行了评估;然而,在完成实施之前,未来仍可能对其他研究进行额外的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparisons of Twelve Freshwater Mussel Bed Assemblages Quantitatively Sampled at a 15-year Interval in the Buffalo National River, Arkansas, USA Assessing the Impacts of Climate Change on the At-Risk Species Anaxyrus microscaphus (The Arizona Toad): A Local and Range-Wide Habitat Suitability Analysis Effects of Environmental Factors on Plant Productivity in the Mountain Grassland of the Mountain Zebra National Park, Eastern Cape, South Africa Soil Conditioning and Neighbor Identity Influence on Cycas Seedling Performance Artificial Light at Night (ALAN) Influences Understory Plant Traits through Ecological Processes: A Two-Year Experiment in a Rubber Plantation in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1