Absorption, Mentalizing, and Mysticism: Sensing the Presence of the Divine

T. J. Coleman, James E. Bartlett, J. Holcombe, Sally B. Swanson, A. Atkinson, Christopher F. Silver, R. Hood
{"title":"Absorption, Mentalizing, and Mysticism: Sensing the Presence of the Divine","authors":"T. J. Coleman, James E. Bartlett, J. Holcombe, Sally B. Swanson, A. Atkinson, Christopher F. Silver, R. Hood","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/k5fp8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research suggests trait absorption, individual differences in Theory of Mind (ToM), and orthopraxical training are important for explaining a variety of extraordinary experiences typically associated with religion. However, no studies exist quantifying ToM ability or testing its relationship with trait absorption in the prediction of what is arguably the most ubiquitous type of extraordinary experience—the mystical experience. To address this, two exploratory studies were conducted using a sample of meditators (N = 269) and undergraduate students (N = 123). In study one, regression analyses revealed weekly religious/spiritual practice, absorption, and mentalizing predict increased mystical experiences. Moreover, moderation analysis indicated the absorption-mysticism relationship is stronger among individuals with lower mentalizing ability. Study two only replicated the relationship of absorption and weekly practice with mysticism. These studies highlight the robust contribution of absorption in mystical experiences and suggest a more dynamic role for mentalizing than is accounted for in the current literature.","PeriodicalId":29718,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/k5fp8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Research suggests trait absorption, individual differences in Theory of Mind (ToM), and orthopraxical training are important for explaining a variety of extraordinary experiences typically associated with religion. However, no studies exist quantifying ToM ability or testing its relationship with trait absorption in the prediction of what is arguably the most ubiquitous type of extraordinary experience—the mystical experience. To address this, two exploratory studies were conducted using a sample of meditators (N = 269) and undergraduate students (N = 123). In study one, regression analyses revealed weekly religious/spiritual practice, absorption, and mentalizing predict increased mystical experiences. Moreover, moderation analysis indicated the absorption-mysticism relationship is stronger among individuals with lower mentalizing ability. Study two only replicated the relationship of absorption and weekly practice with mysticism. These studies highlight the robust contribution of absorption in mystical experiences and suggest a more dynamic role for mentalizing than is accounted for in the current literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吸收,精神化和神秘主义:感知神的存在
研究表明,特质吸收、心理理论(ToM)的个体差异和整形外科训练对于解释通常与宗教有关的各种非凡经历很重要。然而,在预测可以说是最普遍的非凡体验类型——神秘体验时,没有研究量化ToM能力,也没有测试其与特质吸收的关系。为了解决这一问题,使用冥想者(N=269)和本科生(N=123)的样本进行了两项探索性研究。在第一项研究中,回归分析显示,每周的宗教/精神实践、吸收和心理化预测了神秘体验的增加。此外,适度分析表明,在心智化能力较低的个体中,吸收-神秘主义关系更强。研究二只是复制了吸收和每周练习与神秘主义的关系。这些研究强调了对神秘体验的吸收所做出的巨大贡献,并表明与当前文献相比,精神化的作用更具活力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vastness as an Embodied Representation of Existential Concepts Embodiment, Deity Yoga, Cognitive and Evolutionary Approaches to Religion Beyond Heaven and Earth: A Cognitive Theory of Religion, by Gabriel Levy Raising the Buddha’s Hand Religion Devolving?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1