Supplemental Material for User-Generated Digital Flashcards Yield Better Learning Than Premade Flashcards

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition Pub Date : 2022-12-05 DOI:10.1037/mac0000083.supp
Steven C. Pan, I. Zung, Megan N. Imundo, Xuxin Zhang, Yunning Qiu
{"title":"Supplemental Material for User-Generated Digital Flashcards Yield Better Learning Than Premade Flashcards","authors":"Steven C. Pan, I. Zung, Megan N. Imundo, Xuxin Zhang, Yunning Qiu","doi":"10.1037/mac0000083.supp","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital flashcard users typically must choose between creating their own flashcard content or using freely available flashcard sets. The latter is more convenient and saves time, but is it more effective for learning?We conducted six experiments, each involving the use of user-generated or premade flashcards to learn material drawn from educational text passages, followed by a 48-hr delayed criterial test. Different approaches to generating content and variations in the quality of premade content were also examined. Across experiments, user-generated flashcards improved memory relative to premade flashcards (an estimated advantage of d = 0.45, 95% CI [0.25, 0.66]), and in most cases, enhanced performance on application questions (an estimated advantage of d = 0.29, 95% CI [0.12, 0.45]). These results suggest that generating one’s own flashcards enables productive learning processes that enhance memory and comprehension. Accordingly, digital flashcard users may benefit from eschewing premade versions in favor of making their own.","PeriodicalId":47622,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000083.supp","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Digital flashcard users typically must choose between creating their own flashcard content or using freely available flashcard sets. The latter is more convenient and saves time, but is it more effective for learning?We conducted six experiments, each involving the use of user-generated or premade flashcards to learn material drawn from educational text passages, followed by a 48-hr delayed criterial test. Different approaches to generating content and variations in the quality of premade content were also examined. Across experiments, user-generated flashcards improved memory relative to premade flashcards (an estimated advantage of d = 0.45, 95% CI [0.25, 0.66]), and in most cases, enhanced performance on application questions (an estimated advantage of d = 0.29, 95% CI [0.12, 0.45]). These results suggest that generating one’s own flashcards enables productive learning processes that enhance memory and comprehension. Accordingly, digital flashcard users may benefit from eschewing premade versions in favor of making their own.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用户生成的数字抽认卡的补充材料比预先制作的抽认卡学习效果更好
数字闪卡用户通常必须在创建自己的闪卡内容或使用免费提供的闪卡套装之间做出选择。后者更方便,节省时间,但它对学习更有效吗?我们进行了六个实验,每个实验都涉及使用用户生成或预制的抽认卡来学习从教育文本段落中提取的材料,然后进行48小时的延迟标准测试。还研究了生成内容的不同方法以及预制内容质量的变化。在整个实验中,用户生成的抽认卡相对于预制抽认卡提高了内存(估计优势为d=0.45,95%CI[0.25,0.66]),在大多数情况下,提高了应用题的表现(估计优势d=0.29,95%CI[0.124.45])。这些结果表明,生成自己的抽认卡可以实现富有成效的学习过程,提高记忆力和理解力。因此,数字抽认卡用户可能会从避免预制版本而选择自己制作的版本中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
119
期刊最新文献
Den mørke side af semantisk kontekst [the dark side of semantic context]: Semantic context boosts people’s confidence in their ability to comprehend Danish. Supplemental Material for Wordless Wisdom: The Dominant Role of Tacit Knowledge in True and Fake News Discrimination Was he the perpetrator or a bystander? Testing theories of unconscious transference for eyewitness identification. Remembering the Malvinas/Falklands War: National, generational, and ideological differences. Perspective matters: When visual perspective reshapes autobiographical memories.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1