The sociocultural barriers of work-from-home arrangement due to COVID-19 pandemic in Asia: Implications and future implementation

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT Knowledge and Process Management Pub Date : 2022-03-14 DOI:10.1002/kpm.1708
Karel Karsten Himawan, Jessica Helmi, Jappy P. Fanggidae
{"title":"The sociocultural barriers of work-from-home arrangement due to COVID-19 pandemic in Asia: Implications and future implementation","authors":"Karel Karsten Himawan,&nbsp;Jessica Helmi,&nbsp;Jappy P. Fanggidae","doi":"10.1002/kpm.1708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The rapidly escalating COVID-19 pandemic entails many unprecedented life circumstances, including in the way people work. The social distancing policy has forced companies to adopt work-from-home (WFH) arrangement to maintain business sustainability amidst both health and economic crises. While in many developed countries, WFH arrangement has been a common practice, this is not the case in some Asian countries, particularly in countries where high power distance emphasising heightened supervision and punishment among workers are still a preferred managerial style, such as Indonesia, China, India, and Thailand. While acknowledging that WFH is considered as beyond an option in this pandemic period, this commentary paper, built on existing literature presented in the narrative fashion, aims to critically identify key barriers of WFH implementation in some Asian countries, particularly in autocratic societies, using both theoretical and contextual approaches. The paper concludes by discussing recommendation for future studies and proposing strategic implications for companies and workers to effectively adopt WFH arrangement, especially in societies where WFH is still a new practice or is involuntarily held.</p>","PeriodicalId":46428,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge and Process Management","volume":"29 2","pages":"185-193"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/kpm.1708","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge and Process Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/kpm.1708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

The rapidly escalating COVID-19 pandemic entails many unprecedented life circumstances, including in the way people work. The social distancing policy has forced companies to adopt work-from-home (WFH) arrangement to maintain business sustainability amidst both health and economic crises. While in many developed countries, WFH arrangement has been a common practice, this is not the case in some Asian countries, particularly in countries where high power distance emphasising heightened supervision and punishment among workers are still a preferred managerial style, such as Indonesia, China, India, and Thailand. While acknowledging that WFH is considered as beyond an option in this pandemic period, this commentary paper, built on existing literature presented in the narrative fashion, aims to critically identify key barriers of WFH implementation in some Asian countries, particularly in autocratic societies, using both theoretical and contextual approaches. The paper concludes by discussing recommendation for future studies and proposing strategic implications for companies and workers to effectively adopt WFH arrangement, especially in societies where WFH is still a new practice or is involuntarily held.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚洲COVID-19大流行导致的在家工作安排的社会文化障碍:影响和未来实施
快速升级的COVID-19大流行带来了许多前所未有的生活环境,包括人们的工作方式。社会距离政策迫使企业在健康危机和经济危机的情况下,采取在家工作(WFH)的安排,以维持企业的可持续性。虽然在许多发达国家,WFH安排已成为一种普遍做法,但在一些亚洲国家并非如此,特别是在印度尼西亚、中国、印度和泰国等国家,高权力距离强调对工人的高度监督和惩罚仍然是一种首选的管理方式。虽然承认在本次大流行期间,世界卫生组织被认为是一种不可选择的选择,但本评论论文以叙述方式提出的现有文献为基础,旨在利用理论和情境方法,批判性地确定在一些亚洲国家,特别是在专制社会中实施世界卫生组织的主要障碍。本文最后讨论了对未来研究的建议,并为公司和工人有效地采用WFH安排提出了战略意义,特别是在WFH仍然是一种新做法或非自愿持有的社会中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
16.20%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Knowledge and Process Management aims to provide essential information to executives responsible for driving performance improvement in their business or for introducing new ideas to business through thought leadership. The journal meets executives" needs for practical information on the lessons learned from other organizations in the areas of: - knowledge management - organizational learning - core competences - process management
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Unethical favouritism and KH: The mediating role of organisational injustice The next event will be held with more quality: Identifying and prioritizing barriers to knowledge management in sports events Context-driven implementation strategies: Exploring three approaches to implement a lean capability framework within a global production company Toward effective KMS measurement: Usage statistics vs. perceived value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1