The analysis of MCQs in a newly developed reading comprehension ability test: a study on Yemeni undergraduate EFL learners

Iftikhar Yusuf Al-Ariqi, Jagannath K. Dange, Mir Mohsin
{"title":"The analysis of MCQs in a newly developed reading comprehension ability test: a study on Yemeni undergraduate EFL learners","authors":"Iftikhar Yusuf Al-Ariqi, Jagannath K. Dange, Mir Mohsin","doi":"10.1504/IJQRE.2019.10021826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies have shown that the best way to test the students' ability in reading comprehension is the multiple-choice questions (MCQs) for its validity and reliability. This paper tries to assess items and test quality in order to explore the relationship between difficulty index (p-value) and discrimination indices (DIs) with distractor efficiency (DE). The study was conducted among 134 second year Yemeni EFL students in Sana'a University, Yemen. Twenty MCQs analysed for p-value, DI and DE. Results indicated that the mean p-value and DI were 61.92 ± 25.1% and 0.31 ± 0.27, respectively. DI was noted to be maximum at p value range between 40% and 60%. Combining the two indices, 19 items could be called 'good' having a p-value from 20% to 90%, as well as a DI ≥ 0.40. Overall 75% items had two non-functional distractors (NFDs), while 20% items had three functional distractors and 5% had only one functional distractor.","PeriodicalId":90868,"journal":{"name":"International journal of quantitative research in education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of quantitative research in education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJQRE.2019.10021826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies have shown that the best way to test the students' ability in reading comprehension is the multiple-choice questions (MCQs) for its validity and reliability. This paper tries to assess items and test quality in order to explore the relationship between difficulty index (p-value) and discrimination indices (DIs) with distractor efficiency (DE). The study was conducted among 134 second year Yemeni EFL students in Sana'a University, Yemen. Twenty MCQs analysed for p-value, DI and DE. Results indicated that the mean p-value and DI were 61.92 ± 25.1% and 0.31 ± 0.27, respectively. DI was noted to be maximum at p value range between 40% and 60%. Combining the two indices, 19 items could be called 'good' having a p-value from 20% to 90%, as well as a DI ≥ 0.40. Overall 75% items had two non-functional distractors (NFDs), while 20% items had three functional distractors and 5% had only one functional distractor.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新开发的阅读理解能力测试中的MCQ分析——对也门大学生英语学习者的研究
研究表明,测试学生阅读理解能力的最佳方法是选择题,因为它具有效度和信度。本文试图通过评估题目和测试质量来探讨难度指数(p值)和辨别指数(DIs)与分心效率(DE)之间的关系。本研究在也门萨那大学的134名二年级学生中进行。分析20个mcq的p值、DI和DE,结果显示p值和DI的平均值分别为61.92±25.1%和0.31±0.27。在p值范围为40% ~ 60%时,DI值最大。综合这两个指标,有19个项目的p值在20% ~ 90%之间,且DI≥0.40,可称为“良好”。总的来说,75%的项目有两个非功能性干扰物,20%的项目有三个功能性干扰物,5%的项目只有一个功能性干扰物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effectiveness of The Independent Teaching Platform (PMM) in Increasing The Competency of Primary and Secondary Education Teachers The Art of Questioning in Online Learning: Effective Questioning Strategies in EFL Reading Class Pragmatics Perspective of Genre-based Approach Essay Writing Textbook to Improve Students’ Writing Skills at English Education Department of Universitas PGRI Semarang The Influence of Lunges and Rubber Load Exercises on Ap Chagi Kick Speed in UNTAD Taekwondo Club (UTC) Athletes The Effects of Using Flashcard Learning Media to Improve Reading Comprehension in Children with Dyslexia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1